View Single Post
Old
  (#78)
Michael is Offline
Senior Member
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,533
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
  Send a message via AIM to Michael Send a message via MSN to Michael Send a message via Yahoo to Michael  
Default 10-22-2006, 09:47 PM

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":50fdb]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M79
Quote:
Originally Posted by geRV
ps2 delivered on games but pretty much everything sony said about graphics was utter bullshit.
I suppose. Some games had great graphics, like God of War and Shadow of the Colossus.
Shadow of the Colossus' graphics aren't really that nice IMO. Plus the frame rate slows down a pretty good bit throughout the game. I'll agree with you on GoW though. Don't forget Metal Gear Solid 3.

[img]http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/023/928437_20060124_screen003.jpg[/img]

I have a hard time believing that the Dreamcast could have produced the same quality. The Dreamcast was about making fun games, like Power Stone and the NFL 2K series.

I've never been a graphics whore though, and I think the X360 and PS3 level graphics are more than enough to do the job. You'll find no complaints from me about this level of graphic capability:

[img]http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/263/932242_20060921_screen002.jpg[/img]

I played a demo of RSV a few weeks ago and the graphics do look that good.[/quote:50fdb]Well yeah, graphically MGS 3 was pretty good. I just didn't mention it because I only played it once, didn't like it very much. I liked MGS 2 way more. Except for the ending.


  
Reply With Quote