[anti]

i've stopped on the show several times to see that she's in an automatic bias against the defendant. you can't deny that is true from what you've just seen in that video.i mean, come on, she has the audacity to start making personal attacks against the wife's husband, what kind of fucking judge is that and why is that relevant? aside from that, she wouldn't let the defendant get in their side of the story which is what really bothers me. i don't care how wrong they may be, or how much bullshit they are spewing; you don't assume the full story. you work with what you are given with from both sides. she may be right in her hearings, but you have to accept that there's a fault in listening to one side of the story. i've seen her bullshit clutter up the trial many times for the sake of theatre. i would imagine a judge walks into a trial with an open mind ready to hear both sides of the story to make a balanced judgement (hence the name A JUDGE). a judge isn't supposed to be some stuck up bitch ready to please her t.v. audience but i guess this is just a t.v. show. i'm just defending my criticisms of her as a judge when i should be seeing her as an actor. attend law school? come on juju, let's not start making facetious statements here.