Alliedassault - View Single Post

Pfc.Green · 10-06-2002, 08:47 AM

[quote="Recycled Spooge":a9c07]Yeah, I find the ground and the cockpits to look pretty bad in CFS3, and I hear it's not realistic when the planes are pushed to their limits in terms of flight characteristics, but if all you're looking for is eye candy, then go for it.[/quote:a9c07]

It'll be more than eye candy, CFS2 was a really good game, on a scale of 1 to 10 for realisim i'd say it gets a 8.5-9 where Il-2 gets a 10. The CFS series ground design is well done, since it models the actually topography of europe. CFS2's flight characteristics were pretty good, stalls and such were done well, weapons characteristics. The Graphics in 2 were great for its time a CFS3 looks to surpass it by a mile.

	(#21)
Pfc.Green is Offline Senior Member Posts: 3,849 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Bothell, Washington, U.S.A	10-06-2002, 08:47 AM [quote="Recycled Spooge":a9c07]Yeah, I find the ground and the cockpits to look pretty bad in CFS3, and I hear it's not realistic when the planes are pushed to their limits in terms of flight characteristics, but if all you're looking for is eye candy, then go for it.[/quote:a9c07] It'll be more than eye candy, CFS2 was a really good game, on a scale of 1 to 10 for realisim i'd say it gets a 8.5-9 where Il-2 gets a 10. The CFS series ground design is well done, since it models the actually topography of europe. CFS2's flight characteristics were pretty good, stalls and such were done well, weapons characteristics. The Graphics in 2 were great for its time a CFS3 looks to surpass it by a mile.