Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Offtopic
Reload this Page Russia Developing New Nuclear Missile
Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Russia Developing New Nuclear Missile
Old
  (#1)
BeanerMan is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 190
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BeanerLand
   
Default Russia Developing New Nuclear Missile - 11-17-2004, 02:33 PM

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2...es_x.htm<br />

[quote:5ad97]MOSCOW (AP) — President Vladimir Putin said Wednesday that Russia is developing a new form of nuclear missile unlike those held by other countries, news agencies reported Speaking at a meeting of the Armed Forces' leadership, Putin said Russia is researching and successfully testing new nuclear missile systems, the ITAR-Tass news agency reported

"I am sure that ... they will be put in service within the next few years and, what is more, they will be developments of the kind that other nuclear powers do not and will not have," Putin was quoted as saying.

Putin reportedly said: "International terrorism is one of the major threats for Russia. We understand as soon as we ignore such components of our defense as a nuclear and missile shield, other threats may occur."

"We'll continue our efforts to build our armed forces and its nuclear component," Putin said, according to ITAR-Tass.

No details were immediately available, but Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov said earlier this month that Russia expected to test-fire a mobile version of its Topol-M ballistic missile this year and that production of the new weapon could be commissioned in 2005.

Topol-Ms have been deployed in silos since 1998. The missiles have a range of about 6,000 miles and reportedly can maneuver in ways that are difficult to detect.

News reports have also said Russia is believed to be developing a next-generation heavy nuclear missile that could carry up to 10 nuclear warheads weighing a total of 4.4 tons, compared with the Topol-M's 1.32-ton combat payload.

Earlier this year, a senior Defense Ministry official was quoted as telling news agencies that Russia had developed a weapon that could make the United States' proposed missile-defense system useless. Details were not given, but military analysts said the claimed new weapon could be a hypersonic cruise missile or maneuverable ballistic missile warheads.

Putin repeatedly has vowed to restore Russia's military power, which declined after the breakup of the Soviet Union amid severe funding problems. His latest statement sets an assertive tone ahead of this weekend's summit of the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation organization, where he is expected to have a bilateral meeting with President Bush.

Independent military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer said the statement appeared to be as much for show as for military strategy.

"This is intended for the internal audience, an attempt to say that things are great, that defense is growing stronger and not falling apart as it actually is," Felgenhauer said. [/quote:5ad97]

Thoughts?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
mR.cLeAn is Offline
Sergeant
 
Posts: 1,000
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth
  Send a message via MSN to mR.cLeAn  
Default 11-17-2004, 02:37 PM

I'm not worry about them having nuclear missile ...
i would worry if it was a middle eastern country or north korea, or venezuela, but they don't have that much money
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Trunks is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
  Send a message via AIM to Trunks Send a message via MSN to Trunks Send a message via Yahoo to Trunks  
Default 11-17-2004, 02:38 PM

well i dont see how nuclear weapons could be made any more lethal... And we cant say anything because we have just as many nukes as they do, and I am sure we are experimenting with all sorts of ways to make them more deadlier.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Pyro is Offline
Chief of Staff General
 
Pyro's Avatar
 
Posts: 20,691
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brampton Ontario Canada
  Send a message via AIM to Pyro Send a message via MSN to Pyro  
Default 11-17-2004, 02:43 PM

If America has any right to have them, then any country should have a right. Only one country has ever used them for real...


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Unknown_Sniper is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,724
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mostly Vermont. Also New Hampshire
  Send a message via AIM to Unknown_Sniper  
Default 11-17-2004, 02:55 PM

actually there are a few countries who have used them, not necesarily on people though.
[quote:95805]well i dont see how nuclear weapons could be made any more lethal[/quote:95805]
easy they make them 4x as large and you can blow up 4x as much shit.

I dont like the sound of where this is heading. In 10 years we might have another cold war. And if this middle east shit is going on it might heat up to the temp's of hell pretty quickly.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
tomxtr is Offline
Sergeant
 
Posts: 1,234
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
   
Default 11-17-2004, 03:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
If America has any right to have them, then any country should have a right.
rolleyes: annoy:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
TonyMontana is Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 7,860
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: one
  Send a message via AIM to TonyMontana Send a message via MSN to TonyMontana  
Default 11-17-2004, 03:06 PM

AHH MOTHERLAND!!!!!


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
bukdez is Offline
1st Lieutenant
 
bukdez's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,948
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: humping gobots...
   
Default 11-17-2004, 03:21 PM

[quote="mR.cLeAn":5d851]I'm not worry about them having nuclear missile ...
i would worry if it was a middle eastern country or north korea, or venezuela, but they don't have that much money[/quote:5d851]

they sure had everybody worried for a decade or two... why are they less scary than any other nuclear nation?... you trust the ruskies?...

three words: K G B...
biggrin:...
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Unknown_Sniper is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,724
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mostly Vermont. Also New Hampshire
  Send a message via AIM to Unknown_Sniper  
Default 11-17-2004, 03:30 PM

I cant beleive it but sclass found this one
http://img40.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img40&im ... imovie.swf
do y oureally want this happening?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
MotoxXx is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,343
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Amerika
  Send a message via AIM to MotoxXx Send a message via MSN to MotoxXx Send a message via Yahoo to MotoxXx  
Default 11-17-2004, 03:54 PM

[quote="Unknown_Sniper":a120a]do y oureally want this happening?[/quote:a120a]

Only if I can control the ROFLApache
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Trunks is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
  Send a message via AIM to Trunks Send a message via MSN to Trunks Send a message via Yahoo to Trunks  
Default 11-17-2004, 04:59 PM

[quote=bukdez]
Quote:
Originally Posted by "mR.cLeAn":09abe
I'm not worry about them having nuclear missile ...
i would worry if it was a middle eastern country or north korea, or venezuela, but they don't have that much money
they sure had everybody worried for a decade or two... why are they less scary than any other nuclear nation?... you trust the ruskies?...

three words: K G B...
biggrin:...[/quote:09abe]lol. Yes KGB does own. I hear they are some of the best at hand to hand fighting and grappling.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default 11-17-2004, 05:05 PM

Well, thank your president for abolishing the non proliferation treaty. He said that they would get rid of 2/3 of Russia's nuclear weapons I believe, but they didn't say anything about replacing them.

GG
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
Double U is Offline
Sergeant
 
Posts: 1,100
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canada
   
Default 11-17-2004, 05:32 PM

w00t for WW3, well with George Bush as president I wouldnt be one bit surprised if he ordered them to stop, and if they didnt he would roll all them troops over to Russia. Not to worried? Well hell you ougth to be. What in godsname else would you need a new nuclear weapon for.

I mean doesnt this quote just sum up everything?

"New nuclear weapons systems being developed in Russia could include a missile designed to defeat the U.S. missile defence shield."
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Duke_of_Ray is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,672
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for beans and love.
  Send a message via AIM to Duke_of_Ray  
Default 11-17-2004, 05:49 PM

Nukes of Sexy.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Ferich is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Ferich's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,517
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lancaster, Pennsylvania
  Send a message via AIM to Ferich  
Default 11-17-2004, 05:53 PM

Ivan's back.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.