[Godsmack]

I had a good idea last night... take the models and shit from aa and port them over to PA turn this shit of an ass game in to the classic MOH:aa?

just a thought...?

[philadelphia killing mach]

***$##!!!***!!! i allready burned my copy of MOHPA in the backyard (afterwards i of course , deficated and peed on it then buried it and salted the earth so no more of this could grow)

[Godsmack]

[quote="philadelphia killing mach":04d48]***$##!!!***!!! i allready burned my copy of MOHPA in the backyard (afterwards i of course , deficated and peed on it then buried it and salted the earth so no more of this could grow)[/quote:04d48]

[img]http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/otn/laughing/yelrotflmao.gif[/img]

[germ]

is pacific assault really that bad?

i played the demos (sp and mp)

they seem fine. is it worst than allied assault? i didint like allied assault's lone man play though. and i hated the boring team deathmatches.

i think invader mode adds flavor, and the whole ironsight deal is great. plus less run and gun(well sometimes)

[Michael]

AA will always be better than PA. graphics and a few lil features won't save PA from being on the crapper list of MOH games.

[General Death]

Originally Posted by germ

is pacific assault really that bad?

i played the demos (sp and mp)

they seem fine. is it worst than allied assault? i didint like allied assault's lone man play though. and i hated the boring team deathmatches.

i think invader mode adds flavor, and the whole ironsight deal is great. plus less run and gun(well sometimes)

Just make sure you read ALL of the reviews out on the interent about it. The typical responses I have seen and should not be taken into account:

Q: Why are the maps full of jungles and islands?
A: The game is called "Pacific Assault"...welcome to the pacific theater.

Q: Why wont this game support 32mb geforce2 cards or my 400mhz CPU?
A: You bought a game developed in 2003-2004. Welcome to the world of gaming.

Most of the people hate the game because its not set in Europe, does not run on an outdated PC, and they hate EA. The bad part is they know these well before they download a demo or buy the game.

They really only "bad" part with the game is there is still no linux server support. We have told EALA they are long past due on these.

[WidowMaker555]

[quote="General Death":b5918]

Originally Posted by germ

is pacific assault really that bad?

i played the demos (sp and mp)

they seem fine. is it worst than allied assault? i didint like allied assault's lone man play though. and i hated the boring team deathmatches.

i think invader mode adds flavor, and the whole ironsight deal is great. plus less run and gun(well sometimes)

Just make sure you read ALL of the reviews out on the interent about it. The typical responses I have seen and should not be taken into account:

Q: Why are the maps full of jungles and islands?
A: The game is called "Pacific Assault"...welcome to the pacific theater.

Q: Why wont this game support 32mb geforce2 cards or my 400mhz CPU?
A: You bought a game developed in 2003-2004. Welcome to the world of gaming.

Most of the people hate the game because its not set in Europe, does not run on an outdated PC, and they hate EA. The bad part is they know these well before they download a demo or buy the game.

They really only "bad" part with the game is there is still no linux server support. We have told EALA they are long past due on these. [/quote:b5918]

rock: dance:

[Godsmack]

The only good thing about it is the graphics and that havok thing.... its just another SH and BT annoy:

MOH:AA > MOH:SH, BT, PA

[imported_Grim_Reaper]

Desert Storm looks like it will make PA good.

[Godsmack]

[quote="Grim_Reaper":e409d]Desert Storm looks like it will make PA good.[/quote:e409d]

Pa would be a good thing to make a vietnam mod on

[R'Jackson'Harris]

theres so much vietnam stuff going around its getting borring.

[Godsmack]

[quote="R'Jackson'Harris":5d184]theres so much vietnam stuff going around its getting borring.[/quote:5d184]

WW2 is getting boring

[Hawke]

[quote=Godsmack]

Originally Posted by "R'Jackson'Harris":9391f

theres so much vietnam stuff going around its getting borring.

WW2 is getting boring[/quote:9391f]
To me, any war in general is getting boring which is why I stopped playing video games. Now I just design stuff and let people use it.

[snipes]

[quote="General Death":a7bdf]

Originally Posted by germ

is pacific assault really that bad?

i played the demos (sp and mp)

they seem fine. is it worst than allied assault? i didint like allied assault's lone man play though. and i hated the boring team deathmatches.

i think invader mode adds flavor, and the whole ironsight deal is great. plus less run and gun(well sometimes)

Just make sure you read ALL of the reviews out on the interent about it. The typical responses I have seen and should not be taken into account:

Q: Why are the maps full of jungles and islands?
A: The game is called "Pacific Assault"...welcome to the pacific theater.

Q: Why wont this game support 32mb geforce2 cards or my 400mhz CPU?
A: You bought a game developed in 2003-2004. Welcome to the world of gaming.

Most of the people hate the game because its not set in Europe, does not run on an outdated PC, and they hate EA. The bad part is they know these well before they download a demo or buy the game.

They really only "bad" part with the game is there is still no linux server support. We have told EALA they are long past due on these. [/quote:a7bdf]

And WHY do people hate EA? They don't like their games. All EA seems to care about is money. They have a lack of support for the games they release. They are trying to buy out other gaming companies so they may forward on their mediocre, greedy strategies of producing games.

THAT is why people dislike EA, and their games. I doubt any of the reasons you listed, IE, that the maps are "full of jungles and islands", have anything to do with the fact that people dislike the game.

All the reviews I've read about the game said basically the same thing. Pacific Assault lacks the quality gamers have come to expect, and that PA could have been a lot better.

So, PA is mediocre; People seem to claim it is one of the best games they've ever played, others say it was one of the worst. The range of the reviews would be smaller if EA had developed a better game, and they alone are at fault for that.

[imported_Grim_Reaper]

dude, this thread is almost a month old.