Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Offtopic
Reload this Page Athlon64 vs Pentium 4EE
Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Athlon64 vs Pentium 4EE
Old
  (#1)
Hollywood is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,565
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education"
   
Default Athlon64 vs Pentium 4EE - 09-23-2003, 03:30 PM

http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTI0

Very interesting article comparing the various AMD 64-Bit processors with the Pentium 4EE.

Here's an interesting quote from one of the benchmarks "We could not get the nForce3 board to complete even one successful benchmark run of 3DMark2001. Manipulating drivers and DX9 versions did little to help and this issue has not yet been resolved."
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Drew is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,292
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Drew  
Default 09-23-2003, 04:01 PM

Just out of sheer curiosity, why are they comparing benchmarks between Intel's 32-bit and Athlon's 64-bit? Of course 64-bit processors are going to do better when it comes to raw data processing oOo:

I think the funny thing is how close the Intel 32-bit chips run to the Athlon 64-bit.



Chairperson, Coastal Carolina Students for Ron Paul 2008
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Sergeant_Scrotum is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,003
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
  Send a message via MSN to Sergeant_Scrotum  
Default 09-23-2003, 04:11 PM

athalon pwns
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
ShagNasty is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 573
Join Date: Aug 2003
   
Default 09-23-2003, 04:21 PM

[quote:f25bf]athalon pwns
[/quote:f25bf]


They sure do. pentium is way over priced and only noobs buy them.
















sarcasm
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 09-23-2003, 04:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noctis
Just out of sheer curiosity, why are they comparing benchmarks between Intel's 32-bit and Athlon's 64-bit? Of course 64-bit processors are going to do better when it comes to raw data processing oOo:

I think the funny thing is how close the Intel 32-bit chips run to the Athlon 64-bit.
and knowing Athlon's processors, you'll probably need liquid nitrogen to keep your CPU from melting down,

Also you still can't use RAMBUS with Athlons,
and there's no Windows version currently out for 64bit processors, so it's sort of an expensive, useless thing to have in your computer now.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
DeadlySiner is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 249
Join Date: Mar 2003
   
Default 09-23-2003, 05:33 PM

server 2003
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 09-23-2003, 05:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noctis
Just out of sheer curiosity, why are they comparing benchmarks between Intel's 32-bit and Athlon's 64-bit? Of course 64-bit processors are going to do better when it comes to raw data processing oOo:

I think the funny thing is how close the Intel 32-bit chips run to the Athlon 64-bit.


cough cough "fanboy" cough.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Bazooka_Joe is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 12,585
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY, USA
 Send a message via ICQ to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via AIM to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via MSN to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via Yahoo to Bazooka_Joe  
Default 09-23-2003, 07:55 PM

[quote:77d78]The real beauty here lies in the Athlon64's ability to run current 32-bit applications and operating systems right now, and with "no" penalty. When 64-bit applications and OSes come to market, the Athlon64 will be ready to take advantage of them and still be able to run native 32-bit apps right alongside the 64-bit ones. [/quote:77d78]

This is my main concern. HP told me that my burner would be able to read DVD-R's once the technoligy was available, but that never happened, and it cost me an additional 100 bucks to get something I already was sopposed to have.

Being one of the first people to jump on the "3Ghz Hyper-Threading: 2 processors in one" Technoligy wagon, I have no rush to go out and up my system with either chip. What I mean by this is the newest and best thing in technoligy is not always the biggest promise you expect. IMO, I would of stuck with the 2.8Ghz processor without hyper-threading.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 09-23-2003, 08:22 PM

[quote="Bazooka_Joe":95598][quote:95598]The real beauty here lies in the Athlon64's ability to run current 32-bit applications and operating systems right now, and with "no" penalty. When 64-bit applications and OSes come to market, the Athlon64 will be ready to take advantage of them and still be able to run native 32-bit apps right alongside the 64-bit ones. [/quote:95598]

This is my main concern. HP told me that my burner would be able to read DVD-R's once the technoligy was available, but that never happened, and it cost me an additional 100 bucks to get something I already was sopposed to have.

Being one of the first people to jump on the "3Ghz Hyper-Threading: 2 processors in one" Technoligy wagon, I have no rush to go out and up my system with either chip. What I mean by this is the newest and best thing in technoligy is not always the biggest promise you expect. IMO, I would of stuck with the 2.8Ghz processor without hyper-threading.[/quote:95598]

The A64 just needs some 64bit software to show it's true potential.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Jedi Marksman is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,428
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Everywhere and nowhere
  Send a message via AIM to Jedi Marksman Send a message via MSN to Jedi Marksman Send a message via Yahoo to Jedi Marksman  
Default 10-02-2003, 03:15 PM

The A64 just needs some 64bit software to show it's true potential.[/quote]

True. Too bad Microsoft only gives 64-bit Operating Systems to OEMs at this point. I'll stick with my Athlon XP 2800(2.1Ghz)for now.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.