Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page Iran turns down EU nuclear offer
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Iran turns down EU nuclear offer
Old
  (#1)
Stammer is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,021
Join Date: Mar 2005
   
Default Iran turns down EU nuclear offer - 08-06-2005, 02:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC
Iran turns down EU nuclear offer

Iran has rejected the latest European proposals for resolving concerns over the country's nuclear programme.

The US had backed the package, which includes a proposal to let Iran develop a civilian nuclear programme if it halts uranium enrichment activities.

Tehran has threatened to resume nuclear activities next week that have been suspended since November 2004.

Its rejection of the EU proposals came as the new hardline President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was sworn in.

Iran says its nuclear programme is peaceful, but Western countries suspect it is a front hiding efforts to build atomic bombs.

The European Union - through Britain, Germany and France - has been trying to find a compromise solution over Iran's nuclear plans for two years.

But correspondents say the latest proposals fail to contain any fundamental new concessions.

'Unacceptable'

"The Europeans' submitted proposals regarding the nuclear case are not acceptable for Iran," foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi was quoted as saying.

"The proposals are unacceptable because Iran's right to enrich uranium is not included," Mr Asefi said.

He added that a full response to the EU's proposals would come on Saturday or Sunday.

Earlier, Under-Secretary of State Nicholas Burns said the US hoped Iran would take the proposal seriously and that Washington was "very much in support" of efforts by the three European states.

BBC State Department correspondent Jonathan Beale said the US move was highly significant, given that until recently, the US opposed Iran having its own civilian nuclear programme, as it suspected Tehran of wanting to develop nuclear weapons.

The EU plan - which has not been made public - is said to offer recognition of Iran's right to produce nuclear power for civilian purposes, as well improved trade relations with the EU and guarantees of alternative nuclear fuel sources from Europe and Russia.

In return, the Europeans reportedly insist that Tehran should permanently give up nuclear enrichment and construction of a heavy-water reactor, which could be used to make a bomb.

Emergency meeting

Last week, Tehran said work at the uranium conversion plant near Isfahan would start again on Wednesday and cited lack of progress in talks with the UK, France and Germany.

Britain, France and Germany have called an emergency meeting of the UN's nuclear agency, the IAEA, on Tuesday.

The agency could refer the matter to the UN Security Council.
Looks like a war is in the future with Iran.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Pyro is Offline
Chief of Staff General
 
Pyro's Avatar
 
Posts: 20,691
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brampton Ontario Canada
  Send a message via AIM to Pyro Send a message via MSN to Pyro  
Default 08-06-2005, 06:45 PM

Why can't we force America to disarm too? Sounds fair to me...no body allowed to have nukes...sounds like a fucking nobel prize for anyone who can make that happen.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Stammer is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,021
Join Date: Mar 2005
   
Default 08-06-2005, 08:11 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Why can't we force America to disarm too? Sounds fair to me...no body allowed to have nukes...sounds like a fucking nobel prize for anyone who can make that happen.
It was Europe that demanded they stop their nuclear weapons programs, America just backed the plan.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Poseidon is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,358
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Good ol' England!
   
Default 08-06-2005, 08:42 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Why can't we force America to disarm too? Sounds fair to me...no body allowed to have nukes...sounds like a fucking nobel prize for anyone who can make that happen.
It was Europe that demanded they stop their nuclear weapons programs, America just backed the plan.
i still agree with pyro, every nuclear bomb should be handed in and destroyed. This will make the world a better place.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
c312 is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,769
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia
  Send a message via AIM to c312  
Default 08-06-2005, 11:21 PM

I think that disassembling all the nukes would be a great idea except now that the technology is there, there will always be a North Korea or Iran or some country that will create a nuclear program secretly and then that person can hold the rest of the world hostage. So I don't think the idea could ever really work unless we could garauntee that nobody anywhere could build any nukes because if they secretly made one, everybody would be screwed.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Johnj is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Johnj's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,192
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City KS
   
Default 08-07-2005, 06:35 AM

Hand them in to who?


**Practicing the dark art of turn signal usage since 1976.**
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Poseidon is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,358
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Good ol' England!
   
Default 08-07-2005, 06:42 AM

a meeting with representatives from each participating country and watch them being dismantled (destroyed)
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Johnj is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Johnj's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,192
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City KS
   
Default 08-07-2005, 06:59 AM

Yea, like that's going to work.

wallbash:


**Practicing the dark art of turn signal usage since 1976.**
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Jimbo@ is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2004
   
Default 08-07-2005, 07:13 AM

Letting Iran have nukes will likely stabilise the region.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Pyro is Offline
Chief of Staff General
 
Pyro's Avatar
 
Posts: 20,691
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brampton Ontario Canada
  Send a message via AIM to Pyro Send a message via MSN to Pyro  
Default 08-07-2005, 10:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by c312
I think that disassembling all the nukes would be a great idea except now that the technology is there, there will always be a North Korea or Iran or some country that will create a nuclear program secretly and then that person can hold the rest of the world hostage. So I don't think the idea could ever really work unless we could garauntee that nobody anywhere could build any nukes because if they secretly made one, everybody would be screwed.
Yeah that's gonna be pretty hard to have happen.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 08-08-2005, 12:28 AM

Iraq.... Part 3.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
rdeyes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,459
Join Date: May 2003
Location: anchorage,ak
 Send a message via ICQ to rdeyes Send a message via Yahoo to rdeyes  
Default 08-08-2005, 10:42 AM

[quote="Jimbo@":12923]Letting Iran have nukes will likely stabilise the region.[/quote:12923]

eek:

yeah that would make the mideast alot more safe .... rolleyes:
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.