Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page Iraq had no WMD, no ties to Al-Qaeda, & no ties to 9/11
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Iraq had no WMD, no ties to Al-Qaeda, & no ties to 9/11
Old
  (#1)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default Iraq had no WMD, no ties to Al-Qaeda, & no ties to 9/11 - 10-11-2005, 01:39 PM

From 911Blogger.com

Sunday, October 02, 2005

There Were No WMD In Iraq, No Ties To Al-Qaeda, And No Ties Between Iraq And 9/11

For those of us eternally arguing with those who insist the war in Iraq is a war against terrorism, consider sharing this list with them. Then ask them where their Bush's war on terrorism really is.

No WMD In Iraq
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134625,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3718150.stm
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/ ... md.report/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6190720/
http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq ... -wmd_x.htm
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_e ... _10-7.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jan11.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0, ... 29,00.html

No Ties To Al-Qaeda
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122821,00.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jun16.html
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/ ... ommission/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5223932/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3812351.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story ... 92,00.html

Iraq Had Nothing To Do With 9/11
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,97527,00.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jun16.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jun16.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5223932/
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/ ... ommission/
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/ ... raq18.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/ ... 0830.shtml
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editor ... _no_truth/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3812351.stm


Source:
http://www.911blogger.com/2005/10/there ... es-to.html
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Coleman is Offline
Major General
 
Coleman's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
   
Default 10-11-2005, 01:53 PM

Saddam was a fucking psycho.
"although the weapons stockpiles were destroyed, Saddam’s government was looking to begin a WMD program again."

The UN gave him all the time he wanted. He didn't follow the UN orders. So what happened? Nothing. The UN is a joke. That's why the US had to do something before he could really hurt more people.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 10-11-2005, 02:22 PM

well, if a blogger said it thenit must be true
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Tripper is Offline
General of the Army
 
Posts: 18,895
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
   
Default 10-11-2005, 03:09 PM

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":9ab79]well, if a blogger said it thenit must be true[/quote:9ab79]

I'm sorry....Did you miss the 25 credible links that ninty also posted? If you tell me they're bias - Then we can all assume you're just a blind follower and have no real opinion of your own.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
1080jibber is Offline
1st Lieutenant
 
1080jibber's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,435
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: American't
 Send a message via ICQ to 1080jibber  
Default 10-11-2005, 03:46 PM

Someone wrote to the Toronto Sun newspaper saying;

[quote:91306]Most Americans who support the war in Iraq fall under one or more of three categories:

1.) They're registered Republicans, and will blindly follow the party.
2.) They believe it is the right of the U.S. to dictate their views to the world.
3.) They have a son or daughter serving in the military, and support the war as a defensive mechanism to convince themselves that loss of life is somehow worth it.[/quote:91306]
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
newt. is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
newt.'s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,025
Join Date: Mar 2002
   
Default 10-11-2005, 04:02 PM

iraq is a front on the war against terrorism.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default 10-11-2005, 04:04 PM

[quote="newt.":c7736]iraq is a front on the war against terrorism.[/quote:c7736]
Care to elaborate at all?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 10-11-2005, 05:29 PM

I dont have to read the links. I feel we were justified for Sadaams actions alone. He broke every promise made after the gulf war. The UN is too big a bunch of pussies to stand behind thier own words, so once again it falls on our shoulders. Every country that doesnt back us fully can kiss my ass. We dont need them and we should back out of the UN and kick thier asses out of the US.



here is a link for ya kissmyass.com
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Coleman is Offline
Major General
 
Coleman's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
   
Default 10-11-2005, 05:38 PM

happy:


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Madmartagen is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,558
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
   
Default 10-11-2005, 07:30 PM

wow, youre so gung ho about this war, why arent you in it yet?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
newt. is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
newt.'s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,025
Join Date: Mar 2002
   
Default 10-11-2005, 07:53 PM

[quote=ninty]
Quote:
Originally Posted by "newt.":a1d0f
iraq is a front on the war against terrorism.
Care to elaborate at all?[/quote:a1d0f]

iraq is, or should be, the beginning to a much larger offensive against terrorism. I dunno if it was right or wrong, just or whatever to invade iraq but now that were there, and our persince is known we need to send a message to radicals throughout the world, that terrorism will not stand, whereever they might hide we must find them/capture them/kill them, whatever country abets terrorists we must overthrow and replace it with something, whatever that is, by the majority of people in that region. I dunno if its "just" or "right" on the world scale, but I would rather have the USA, and its allies in control then terrorist holding the threat of a suicide bombing over our heads.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
Madmartagen is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,558
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
   
Default 10-11-2005, 07:57 PM

thats retarded, terrorists didnt appear in iraq until the coalition invaded. if we wanted to make a stand we should have flooded afghanistan and pakistan with troops instead of entering the wrong country. who says the US has a handle on terrorism. there is nothing you can do to prevent a terrorist attack. anyone could make any kind of attack anywhere and at anytime. what message have we sent to radical islam that wasnt said before? osama hasnt been caught and there hasnt been any justice for what happened on 9/11. we just wasted a shit load of money and lost over a thousand troops. GG us.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
newt. is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
newt.'s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,025
Join Date: Mar 2002
   
Default 10-11-2005, 08:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madmartagen
thats retarded, terrorists didnt appear in iraq until the coalition invaded. if we wanted to make a stand we should have flooded afghanistan and pakistan with troops instead of entering the wrong country. who says the US has a handle on terrorism. there is nothing you can do to prevent a terrorist attack. anyone could make any kind of attack anywhere and at anytime. what message have we sent to radical islam that wasnt said before? osama hasnt been caught and there hasnt been any justice for what happened on 9/11. we just wasted a shit load of money and lost over a thousand troops. GG us.
by eliminating radicals who teach their kids to become bombers we save alot of people. you make it sound like terrorism didn't appear till the americans had "landed" oOo:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Jin-Roh is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,546
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
  Send a message via AIM to Jin-Roh Send a message via MSN to Jin-Roh  
Default 10-11-2005, 08:19 PM

I sometimes think it's possible that Bush knows what he is doing. He is in Iraq to "attract" extremists into Iraq and fight the soldiers. Sort of creating a decoy to prevent the extremists from doing more bombings in other countries and so on. eek:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Chappy is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 195
Join Date: Nov 2003
   
Default 10-11-2005, 08:23 PM

what does it matter? we're there, now lets lift up the men and women who are being shot at, and make sure that their efforts do not go unnoticed. right or wrong...the armchair generals and quasi-political experts need to shut their mouths.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.