|
Senior Member
Posts: 8,546
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: I don't know
|
08-30-2002, 10:07 PM
I could write a very angry letter right now about Princess Special ED, but I decided instead merely to express some constructive criticism. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter, but the conclusion's general outline is that Princess ED's flunkies all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. I have nothing more to say on that issue. That being the case, we honestly can infer that I want to thank him for his beliefs. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how illiterate Princess ED can be. While it is reasonable to expect that his fixation on feudalism is nothing more than camouflage for a lack of original ideas, it remains that when I say that he dances to the tune of detestable deconstructionism, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. This is a common fallacy held by mindless champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine. Princess ED is like a broken record, using the same tired cliches about family and education and safer streets, yet in asserting that he has achieved sainthood, he demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision.
It saddens me that the biggest difference between me and Princess ED is that Princess ED wants to cause an increase in disease, post-structuralism, crime, and vice. I, on the other hand, want to foster mutual understanding. Fortunately, the groundswell of quiet opposition to him is getting less quiet and more organized. Still, his credos are a sink-pit of degeneracy, corruption, and ugliness. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it unmistakably expresses how I am chagrined but resigned when I witness the indifference to the fundamentals of language that he displays. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to take the initiative to provide some balance to his one-sided generalizations.
Princess ED wants to poke someone's eyes out. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Princess ED's gossamer grasp of reality. He has convinced a lot of people that his tirades won't be used for political retribution. One must pause in admiration at this triumph of media manipulation. Princess ED insists that his politics are not worth getting outraged about. Sorry, Princess ED, but, with apologies to Gershwin, "it ain't necessarily so."
His faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Princess ED believes that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Princess ED and his myopic myrmidons, who are legion. Certain individuals in intelligence and law enforcement agencies may have overlooked some of his more belligerent double standards. That proves that he wants to toy with our opinions. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom, then you should be working with me to embrace diversity.
At their mildest, Princess ED's blanket statements still manage to convince others that predatory clowns are the "chosen people" of scriptural prophecy. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: Princess ED's rise to power was not accomplished without a fair amount of backstabbing, skulduggery, and unanticipated and unpredictable reversals of fortune. Today, as yesterday, Princess ED frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that once you cut through the bravado, misconceptions, and ignorance, you'll find that respect for the law is not enhanced by setting the bad example of breaking the law? As everyone knows, he clings to onanism like a drowning man clings to a life preserver. What you might not know, however, is that I can undoubtedly suggest how Princess ED ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Princess ED himself.
Is it any wonder that being shielded from the consequences of his bad judgment and bad behavior has made him careless? His attempts to take rights away from individuals whom only Princess ED perceives as lousy are much worse than mere antipluralism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. I believe, way deep down, that the baneful nature of his arguments is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. It's my hunch that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Why do Princess ED's hired goons want to ingratiate themselves with Princess ED?" I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that if I didn't think Princess ED would stand in the way of progress, I wouldn't say that this is not the first time I've wanted to make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change. But it is the first time I realized that I am not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that it seems clear that his plans for the future will indeed lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that when Princess ED says that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.
No amount of opinion or innuendo nor any string of unrelated belief systems can change the fact that it would be wrong to imply that Princess ED is involved in some kind of conspiracy to promote the prodigal pranks of immature control freaks. It would be wrong because his expostulations are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but his campaigns are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're completely disreputable, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, his argument that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty is hopelessly flawed and utterly circuitous. Princess ED ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:
Fact: Thanks to Princess ED, hopeless hoodlums can now freely condone universal oppression.
Fact: Marxism can not and must not be tolerated.
Fact: Princess ED is hell-bent on suppressing our freedom.
In addition, if Princess ED is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards.
Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that his idea of negligent, gormless masochism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of a featherbrained blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a conceited and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to an unsavory frenzy and then prompts them to feature simplistic answers to complex problems. We'd all be in grave danger if Princess ED continued to engage in his raving behavior. He wants nothing less than to throw away our freedom, our honor, and our future, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ridiculous, useless witticisms.
He and his understrappers are, by nature, invidious adulterers. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but Princess ED is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to institutionalize sexism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. Certain facts are clear. For instance, I cannot promise not to be angry at him. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Princess ED -- to stir up trouble. If he is victorious in his quest to smear people of impeccable character and reputation, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.
Because we have the determination to see the truth prevail, we must never forget that much of Princess ED's behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the audacious, predaceous kooks whom Princess ED claims to be trying to help. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Princess ED's slurs have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung. He has been deluding people into believing that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. Don't let him delude you, too. Princess ED's personal attacks have paid off: already, Princess ED has had some success in his efforts to rely on the psychological effects of terror to magnify the localized effects of Princess ED's sound bites so that, like a stone hurled into a pool of water, shock waves ripple from the epicenter of his attacks to the furthest reaches of the Earth. He is off his rocker. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion. One last thing: Princess Special ED and his lickspittles are social pariahs and should be ostracized.
hake: hake: hake:
|
I WAS A TEENAGE WOOKIE, or TALES FROM AN UNLIT BASEMENT
Linear Mode
