[quote:b9114]I'd think you would be a good candidate. A teenaged boy who has his cute little "company" while spending all his free time doing pointless animations for it. Cute... cute..[/quote:b9114]

Real men dont use the word "Cute". They beat the shit out of sissies walking around with a boner after a nice day of "fragging" who use the word - CUTE.

[quote:b9114]Didnt u call this site gay?... Go fuck urself.[/quote:b9114]

Why - so you can grab a quick Handy-Cam, and record you something for lonely Saturday nights when you cant get into a MOH server. Pass.

[quote:b9114]I thought he was once just like being a funnny retard not like now where he is an asshole retard.[/quote:b9114]

The retarded are to be respected and revered. You are to suck the cock of the respected and revered.

[quote:b9114]You are America?[/quote:b9114]

Yes.

[quote:b9114]Ed you stupid annoying gay bastard, to echo the words of Wookie SHUT THE FUCK UP.[/quote:b9114]

Can one of you PLEASE jerk this guy off? You'll probably get about 16 years of pent up homosexual agression but it'll do this chronically pissed fella a great service.

[quote:b9114]Yeah, ED...I caught you:
*In your little dark lair doing rectum surgery on baboons.
*Sitting on an upside down stool.
*Cowering in your mother's arms, while listening too Take On Me by Aha.
*Jerking while jiggiling a fat man's flubber.
*With Richard Simmons, R.Kelly, Pee Wee Herman and the brave little toaster.[/quote:b9114]

Another monster with a handy-cam. You bastards are everywhere.

[quote:b9114]Huh ?? Shut the fuck up Ed[/quote:b9114]

Keep on keeping on Aussie. I just feel bad, cause soon you'll be out of High School (or whatever passes for Australian Education...), and wont be able to use the excuse "I've got alot of extra-curricular activities to do" as an excuse for being unappealing to society in general.[/quote]

[Innoxx]

Maybe I'm naturally oversensitive, or maybe someone just slipped me decaf coffee this morning, but Princess Special ED, Esq. is a prime example of the ignorance, naivete, and plain old stupidity that he so adamantly criticizes. Let me begin by saying that the central paradox of Princess ED's epithets, the twist that makes Princess ED's double standards so irresistible to hypersensitive polemics, is that these people truly believe that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I claim that there is, because we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that he has been robbed of all he does not possess. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that Princess ED refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. It must be stated quite categorically that it must be pointed out that Princess ED's tactics are pockmarked with improvident fanaticism and other assorted ills. (Read as: Princess ED's mottos have nothing to do with freedom and honor but everything to do with antipluralism.) I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like Princess ED extirpate the very things I certainly cherish. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world.

He and I disagree about our civic duties. I think that we must do our utmost to improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society -- the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth -- all of whose lives are made miserable by Special ED as expeditiously as possible. Princess ED, on the other hand, believes that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. As a parenthetical note, if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to contribute to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic. Okay, I admit that our sacred values and traditions mean nothing to Princess ED. But if Princess ED doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere.

Let his chauvinistic sentiments stand as evidence that he proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. People have pointed out to me that under the guise of stimulating debate and illuminating diverse perspectives, Princess ED's equivocations actually dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities, but I still can't help but think that the only weapons Princess ED has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that I regret not writing this letter sooner. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. It is as if we were safely on the bank of a raging river, enjoying a picnic with our friends and family, when a bunch of ribald, patronizing wimps came along and threw us into the river. Not only must we must struggle to avoid drowning in the raging torrent of Princess ED-sponsored hooliganism, but we must crawl out of the river before we can force Princess ED into early retirement.

He must think that being two-faced entitles one to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. In particular, given a choice of having him befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. The space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which Princess ED has tried to condone illegal activities.

I must point out that his operatives argue that he would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a counter-productive act. These are the same vitriolic shirkers who devise disrespectful scams to get money for nothing. This is no coincidence; Princess ED turns his back on our most heartfelt pleas for mercy. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. That's just not true. I apologize if what I'm saying sounds painfully obvious, painfully self-evident. However, it is so extremely important that I must doubtlessly say it.

Some critics have called Princess ED soporific. A handful insist he's immoral. His satraps, on the other hand, consider him to be one of the great minds of this century.

Should you think I'm saying too much, please note that the first response to this from his chums is perhaps that it is disagreeable to question his assertions. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: Just because he and his cult followers don't like being labelled as "jaundiced leeches" or "combative social outcasts" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. Griping about Princess ED will not make him stop trying to create a climate of intimidation. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. When he first announced that he wanted to deny the obvious, I nearly choked on my own stomach bile. If we don't stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Princess ED-induced disaster right now, then Princess ED's practices will soon start to metastasize until they inculcate reprehensible pranks. He says that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely cocky and yellow-bellied lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Princess ED's surrogates.

Despite total incompetence, Princess ED is often afflicted with an amazing conceit, which causes him to create an untrue and injurious impression of an entire people. As a general rule, his myrmidons are merely liars with charisma. And here, I insist, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in his half-measures. He maintains that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. Even if this were so, Princess ED would still be foolhardy. But I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness Princess ED is mongering. We need to solve the problems that are important to most people.

It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How noxious can he be?" It's an interesting question, and its examination will help us understand how Princess ED's mind works. Let me start by providing evidence that Princess ED's insidious, unctuous jeremiads muster enough force to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to mention a bit about witless, truculent whiners such as Princess ED. I, not being one of the many bad-tempered cads of this world, challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. If you were to try to tell Princess ED's deputies that this is sufficiently illustrated by the ridicule with which his bons mots are treated by everyone other than obtuse rotters, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that Princess ED's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it.

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, I must say that Princess ED can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But he can't fool all of the people all of the time. I cannot emphasize enough how much I resent his sound bites. So what if he hates me for pointing out that he bases his sophistries on the belief that he has his moral compass in tact? Let him hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. It is high time for someone to snap Princess Special ED, Esq.'s disciples out of their trance. Will that someone be you?

INNOXX you cad.

"REPLACE" notwithstanding in ones Microsoft Word software, I'm close to finding out where this is taken from.

[Pfc.Green]

Ed we all know your gay, we all know you have the brains of an under devoleped cow, so why dont you do us all a favor and fuck off. You really think your cool dont you with your gay talk and and your stupid posts, you should pay a visit to a mental hospital, you need one.

[Pyro]

porno for all

[ninty]

Ed, I seriously don't get it.

What are the point of your posts??

To make us mad?

To call us names?

To make yourself feel superior?

To tell us that were all gay for being here?

I seriously don;t get what your trying to do. Or why your doing it. Seems like a waste of time to me. Are we going to change? I doubt it. So why are you wasting your time posting in a place that you hate?

Is it because you get a kick out of our responses? If so, then I can understand why you stick around. If you enjoy it in some weird way then OK. But if you don;t, why are you here? Why would you put yourself through needless gayness, for lack of a better word?

[/quote]Ed we all know your gay, we all know you have the brains of an under devoleped cow, so why do you do us all a favor and fuck off. You really think your cool dont you with your gay talk and and your stupid posts I you should pay a visit to a mental hospital, you need one.[/quote]

Mean Green Okerlund - I honestly am trying to help you. Sentence structure notwithstanding, you've got some SERIOUS issues you need to work through before you can even THINK about stepping out into natural sunlight.

Keep tossing around buzzwords like 'gay' and 'fuck' as if it's any REAL substitute for actual thought and constructive criticism. Keep believing in the infallibility of your own hubris and your 'right' to be who you are...somewhere down the line you're going to accept that the time you've spent here...well. I'll leave that nugget of self discovery for when you've got the silver tip pressed firmly against your veins.

I bid thee a goodbye Green. Come back when you've got something more than junior-high-school posturing.

[quote:6602b]Ed, I seriously don't get it.[/quote:6602b]

This can hardly be considered a suprise.

[quote:6602b]What are the point of your posts??[/quote:6602b]

This is the off-topic bullshit forum. Are you REALLY asking this question.

[quote:6602b]To make us mad?[/quote:6602b]

If you get mad at what a faceless, anonymous individual is saying to you thousands of miles away - as Mean Green is - theres a serious need for perspective-evaluation on your part.

[quote:6602b]To call us names?[/quote:6602b]

I give what I get. Find me a post where I have started in on someone unprovoked and you'll humble this mighty poster.

[quote:6602b]To make yourself feel superior?[/quote:6602b]

You mistake me for a moderator sir.

[quote:6602b]To tell us that were all gay for being here?[/quote:6602b]

Who said any of you were gay?

[quote:6602b]I seriously don;t get what your trying to do. Or why your doing it. Seems like a waste of time to me. Are we going to change? I doubt it. So why are you wasting your time posting in a place that you hate?[/quote:6602b]

Who says I hate this forum, or anyone in it. Hate is a word reserved for reality. This isnt. And anything anyone does on here is a waste of time. Or are you going to have fond meaningful memories of the Girl Thread when you are 70?

[quote:6602b]Is it because you get a kick out of our responses? If so, then I can understand why you stick around. If you enjoy it in some weird way then OK. But if you don;t, why are you here? Why would you put yourself through needless gayness, for lack of a better word?[/quote:6602b]

::shrugs::

Couldn't give a shit what sophmoric characterization someone has for me. Gay, fag, blah blah blah ::rundownlistofhardcorewordsthatreallyonlyexposeap ersonsfailings::. It's all the same mate. Just words on a screen that last for about as long as I'm online. Nothing more. Nothing less.

[Pfc.Green]

Oh and your posts froth over with intelligence hake: , do you honestly think that any smart person would not assume you were gay, what with all you posts containing homosexual overtones and phrases. Why are you here anyway. Will someone please ban this snot-nosed bastard?

he sure talks a lot for saying nothing.

[quote:4bf21]Oh and your posts froth over with intelligence , do you honestly think that any smart person would not assume you were gay, what with all you posts containing homosexual overtones and phrases. Why are you here anyway. Will someone please ban this snot-nosed bastard?[/quote:4bf21]

Verily thou doth smarteth me with thy head.

I'm gay? News to me. Thanks for the clever analysis young sir.

However...now that I think about it...

Maybe you're playing a bit of the "hey look over there" with your own sexuality Mean Green. Really. I mean unless you can come up with some evidence of "strong homosexual overtones and phrases" (lol - I laugh everytime I read that sentence, imagining the mental strain and anguish it took to write that Green, I think we have a clear cut case of you trying to make me a sacrificial-gay so that you're free and clear.

I mean your name and your little icons SCREAM Hetero. You know what they say about folks TELL you something before you can come up with your own opine.

[ninty]

[quote="Pfc.Green":002a7]Oh and your posts froth over with intelligence hake: , do you honestly think that any smart person would not assume you were gay, what with all you posts containing homosexual overtones and phrases. Why are you here anyway. Will someone please ban this snot-nosed bastard?[/quote:002a7]

You said froth.

That reminds me of beer...mmmm beer

[Innoxx]

This letter is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how the disrespectful, effrontive bloodsuckers who collaborate with Mr. Special ED should be spat upon -- or worse -- for their lack of integrity. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I give Mr. ED condign punishment. This is well illustrated in what remains one of the most divisive issues of our day: isolationism. The notion that he can be reformed into an upright and honorable person may be a pleasant and attractive thought. But people who believe that this can happen should ask it of Santa Claus, in whom they doubtless also believe.

He is inherently insane, meddlesome, and quasi-self-pitying. Oh, and he also has an unprincipled mode of existence. I want to keep this brief: Mr. ED would have us believe that the laws of nature don't apply to him. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. If he wanted to, he could thrust all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments. He could take us all on a totally reckless ride into the unknown. And he could undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. We must not allow Mr. ED to do any of these.

For those of you out there who don't know what I'm talking about, let me give you a quick explanation: the next time he decides to outrage the very sensibilities of those who value freedom and fairness, he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits? The sole point of agreement between myself and irrational, snotty bureaucrats is that to say that newspapers should report only on items Mr. ED agrees with is mean-spirited nonsense and untrue to boot. If you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that Mr. ED wants us to feel sorry for the lackluster dolts who compromise the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing. I claim we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that if Mr. ED opened his eyes, he'd realize that the grossly fallacious reasoning behind his sound bites can be confirmed by some simple fact-checking.

What he doesn't realize is that we must keep our eyes on the prize. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, inconsiderate world run by shiftless fugitives. There are three fairly obvious problems with Mr. ED's methods of interpretation, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry, rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. First, everything Mr. ED tells you is a lie. Second, Mr. ED is slated for an unwept grave. And third, most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. What he is doing is philistinism in its most doctrinaire form. We can therefore extrapolate that you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with the worst classes of wild underachievers there are?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. Alas, Mr. ED's claim that honor counts for nothing is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind.

Let me try to put this in perspective: If Mr. ED feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. His arrogance has brought this upon himself. Even if our society had no social problems at all, we could still say that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. One thing is certain: Mr. ED will make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses nugatory wrongheaded-types with ignorant and uncontrollable rage.

Here's an eye-opener for you: He would not hesitate to condone illegal activities if he felt he could benefit from doing so. I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to embark on a new path towards change. And just let him try and stop me. We can say that the foundation and wellspring of Mr. ED's contrivances is the cantankerous doctrine of exclusionism, and Mr. ED can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. To what consequences this leads can be seen from a few simple considerations. First of all, he is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse. Responsible citizens certainly do not provide deplorable conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread.

Even without the witless ideology of nonrepresentationalism in the picture, we can still say that he wants all of us to believe that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. I feel no shame in writing that Mr. ED should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants, every time he wants to. We must face the fact that he has spent untold hours trying to numb the public to the tribalism and injustice in mainstream politics. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that each day, I see the world becoming more irritable as a determined Mr. ED carries out his unbalanced plans? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that you don't have to say anything specifically about Mr. ED for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that I should take action.

Plan to join his camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. Put simply, Mr. ED should focus more on the quality of his writing than on the amount of drivel he can squeeze in. If you doubt this, just ask around. If one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why his backers would sooner ally with evil than oppose it. But the short answer is that what we have been imparting to him -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. Maybe Mr. ED just can't handle harsh reality. Don't be intimidated by his threat to produce a new generation of devious rascals whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized.

The only morally sound solution is to report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding his vicious dissertations. With enough time and room, it would be easy to show why this must be true, but the clinching argument is simply that he and I disagree about our civic duties. I insist that we must do our utmost to weed out people like Mr. ED who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us as expeditiously as possible. Mr. ED, on the other hand, believes that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt make bribery legal and part of business as usual". He wants to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly silly. Who does he think he is? I mean, I can't follow his pretzel logic. I do, however, know that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially Mr. ED's jackbooted form of it -- is. No doubt, it is easier for me to imagine a million-dimensional vector space than the number of inconsistencies in Mr. ED's rantings. But Mr. ED goes ga-ga for any type of nepotism you can think of. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke him to glorify disgraceful fast-buck artists?

The solipsism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, petty attack on progressive ideas. Those of you who thought that Mr. ED was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise, because Mr. ED recently announced his plans to raise extortionate demands. He speaks like a true defender of the status quo -- a status quo, we should not forget, that enables him to brand me as prissy. From what I know of his claims, he is saying essentially three things:

Genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all completely justified.
Things have never been better.
The Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel.
Obviously, all three of these are undoubtedly cuckoo. Still, the issue of what to do about Mr. Special ED's self-satisfied, rude press releases is far from settled. The letter you just read should be seen as a starting point for dialogue on this controversial issue.

oOo:

[JowShmoe]

That was a lot of words. some of them were long. i didn't realize people in this forum had progressed past "a is for apple""b is for bear". oh well. no on reads all that writing, so to quote a quote from above, shut the hell up

[Innoxx]

cool:

[mr.miyagi]

The same everytime.
use nice big caps-lock title in topic heading
explain at how superior you think you are
and how we all supposedly never go outside

you're the lamest of the lame, the queerest of the queer.
if you were to ever insult me in person id fuck you over so badly, smash your face to pieces and leave you somewhere to rot in the sun

[NP]Nightmares on Wax - Sal