Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk. |
|
|
Guest
|

02-05-2003, 12:33 AM
[quote:21cb4]lol.....racist jokes are the best though, i love em [/quote:21cb4] oOo:
Ok...
Anywho, I'v read all those befor, Wasn't even that funny.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Captain
Posts: 5,724
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mostly Vermont. Also New Hampshire
|

02-05-2003, 05:44 PM
Yeah the first two joke posts were funny all the rest...well they sucked
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 4,003
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
|

02-05-2003, 05:58 PM
well your all no fun
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 2,106
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Fife, Scotland
|

02-06-2003, 07:41 AM
Ignore the misery guts.
Lets see some more legal things happy:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,463
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fraser Valley, BC, Canada
|

02-06-2003, 11:09 AM
I'll post some more when I get home from school today. biggrin:
|
|
|
 |
 Not really a joke, but... |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,463
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fraser Valley, BC, Canada
|
Not really a joke, but... -
02-06-2003, 02:49 PM
Okay, here is one very strange law,
Section 49 of the Criminal Code of Canada is entitled "Acts intended to alarm Her Majesty" eek: eek:
I'm not making this up, I couldn't even if I wanted to. eek:
This is what S. 49 says:
[quote:2b68f]
Everyone who wilfully, in the presence of Her Majesty,
(a) does an act with intent to alarm Her Majesty or to break the public peace, of
(b) does an act that is intended or is likely to cause bodily harm to Her Majesty,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
[/quote:2b68f]
14 years in prision for scaring the Queen. eek: hake:
|
|
|
 |
 More "Disorder in the Court"... |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,463
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fraser Valley, BC, Canada
|
More "Disorder in the Court"... -
02-06-2003, 03:07 PM
Here's some more from Disorder in the Court:
[quote:c0fa1]
Defense: Do you now wear corrective glasses?
Witness: There are three of you?
Defense: No. There's only one of me.
Judge: Well, there is Spooky, Smiley, Sleepy?
Defense: I don't think there is a Smiley. New Bone?
Witness: There is a Smiley, too.
DA: I meant to say with Spooky?
Witness: Yes.
Judge: Yes. Was Droopy there?
Witness: No, Droopy was at the store. He was there, though.
Judge: I accept that.
DA: What is your nickname?
Witness: Looney.
DA: Looney. No further questions.
DA: Objection, Your Honor, calls for speculation.
Judge: Overruled, unless you can qualify it as to her having been told.
Defense: You mean sustained, Your Honor?
Judge: Pardon?
Defense: Did you mean objection sustained or overruled?
Judge: I'm sorry. If I said sustained, I meant - overruled, I meant sustained, unless -
Defense: Thank you. I'll rephrase the question.
[/quote:c0fa1]
I'll post more later.
|
|
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
|