Whoa.... - Page 6

Conscript · 09-13-2004, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Albow0001

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrLevinstein

Why must we argue about what was on the plane yadda yadda?

I know a plan was crashed into our centers, and terrorists did it. 9/11 taught me that no matter where you come from what you believe or who you are friends with when your countrymen die, you get pissed, you bond and things get tighter.

This thread needs lock, because mel gibson from conspiracy theory is coming out of the woodowkr to give his opinion on this crap, right before the black helocopters get him

Fucking idiot, the point of the last 5 pages was to prove that terrorists DIDN'T do it, and that the country you're bonding under could very well have been responsible.
Sorry, i just hate seeing things like that where people come out of the blue and state something totally against what people have been talking about...happens way too often to get a "lol" anymore...

Personally, i find it interesting, but i'd very much like to see a video on 9-11 published that's only like the first HALF of that video. When you present problems, as much as we freak out because there are no solutions and we all think "wtf am i watching this for", as long as you're not trying to push some specific theory, your error-detections tend to be a lot less biased. If you could just present a movie about 9-11 that didn't warp every bit of information to reach one conclusion or another, i think it would be far better.

Tinfoil hat Brigade?

MrLevinstein · 09-13-2004, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Albow0001

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrLevinstein

Why must we argue about what was on the plane yadda yadda?

I know a plan was crashed into our centers, and terrorists did it. 9/11 taught me that no matter where you come from what you believe or who you are friends with when your countrymen die, you get pissed, you bond and things get tighter.

This thread needs lock, because mel gibson from conspiracy theory is coming out of the woodowkr to give his opinion on this crap, right before the black helocopters get him

Fucking idiot, the point of the last 5 pages was to prove that terrorists DIDN'T do it, and that the country you're bonding under could very well have been responsible.
Sorry, i just hate seeing things like that where people come out of the blue and state something totally against what people have been talking about...happens way too often to get a "lol" anymore...

Personally, i find it interesting, but i'd very much like to see a video on 9-11 published that's only like the first HALF of that video. When you present problems, as much as we freak out because there are no solutions and we all think "wtf am i watching this for", as long as you're not trying to push some specific theory, your error-detections tend to be a lot less biased. If you could just present a movie about 9-11 that didn't warp every bit of information to reach one conclusion or another, i think it would be far better.

YEAH, AMERICANS TOTALLY BLEW UP OUR OWN TRADE CENTERS TO GO INTO ECONOMIC RECESSSION AND GO TO WAR. Sorry for living in the country where it actually happened. You didnt watch 3k of your country men die so youre talking out your fucking ass albow. fucking die

Hawke · 09-13-2004, 09:22 AM

could someone send me this or re-upload it to some place. they download think for me appears to be down.

ninty · 09-13-2004, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrLevinstein

Quote:

Originally Posted by Albow0001

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrLevinstein

Why must we argue about what was on the plane yadda yadda?

I know a plan was crashed into our centers, and terrorists did it. 9/11 taught me that no matter where you come from what you believe or who you are friends with when your countrymen die, you get pissed, you bond and things get tighter.

This thread needs lock, because mel gibson from conspiracy theory is coming out of the woodowkr to give his opinion on this crap, right before the black helocopters get him

Fucking idiot, the point of the last 5 pages was to prove that terrorists DIDN'T do it, and that the country you're bonding under could very well have been responsible.
Sorry, i just hate seeing things like that where people come out of the blue and state something totally against what people have been talking about...happens way too often to get a "lol" anymore...

Personally, i find it interesting, but i'd very much like to see a video on 9-11 published that's only like the first HALF of that video. When you present problems, as much as we freak out because there are no solutions and we all think "wtf am i watching this for", as long as you're not trying to push some specific theory, your error-detections tend to be a lot less biased. If you could just present a movie about 9-11 that didn't warp every bit of information to reach one conclusion or another, i think it would be far better.

YEAH, AMERICANS TOTALLY BLEW UP OUR OWN TRADE CENTERS TO GO INTO ECONOMIC RECESSSION AND GO TO WAR. Sorry for living in the country where it actually happened. You didnt watch 3k of your country men die so youre talking out your fucking ass albow. fucking die

Well, let me first say that i'm not saying for sure that the USA blew up its own buildings for certain reasons. I don't know exactly, and I think there is a possibility that they could have.

What we do know however is that it has happened in the past. Nero torched Rome and blamed it on the Christians because they were getting to powerful. Hitler wanted absolute power, so he burned the Riechstag, and told the people if they wanted to be safe, to give him absolute power as the Fuhrer.

Why is this any different? Terrorist attack happens, US Government says we need more money to defend against terrorism. We also need to pass legislation like the patriot act, the terrorist bill or whatever it is etc. Now what happens when another terrorist attack happens and 10,000 people die? The government might say we want all US citizens to have national id cards, and if you don't have one, you're illegal. And we want all citizens to have microchips implanted in them so we can track them and arrest certain individuals. And people will gladly give away their freedoms because they don't want another attack.

And this is not only Republicans. Remember the cruise missile strike on Sudan? There was a lot of other stuff going on for Bill Clinton at that time. Good one Bill. oOo:

Anyway, the point is that I think this is possible. I'm not saying its 100% fact, but we have seen it throughout history, and why would any leader not want more power and control?

geRV · 09-13-2004, 11:37 AM

^ Yup

Think most people have heard 911 referred to as another pearl harbor, after pearl harbor the military got more money etc, this is no different.