16?

EaSyTrIcK50 · 08-19-2001, 12:03 AM

Wait, the IGN preview said that only 16 players can play in MP. Is this true? PLease tell me more can play. I know nobody knows for certain, but what are your thoughts?

------------------

"The Only Time You Worry About A Soldier Is When He Stops Bitching"

intrestedviewer · 08-19-2001, 12:32 AM

it did? well theyll probably add more as time goes on. member half life started the same way, now it supports like 36 er something like that.

fuel_200 · 08-19-2001, 04:48 AM

32 actually, I play DoD everyday.

borntokill · 08-19-2001, 05:31 AM

im really good at dod i mean da bomb.I hope mohad will have good multi tho.

kraut-kill3r · 08-19-2001, 06:03 AM

16 isnt that bad either, i like it when servers have 16, 8 per team. except its bad for us since our clans have more then 8 guys, but its not like every single guy from the clan will be able to play all the time.

------------------

Maverick · 08-19-2001, 08:02 AM

yea i usually dont play in games over 20 people. Just to much lag, and too many people in a DoD's small maps...

Obergrenadier · 08-20-2001, 03:28 AM

well for clan matches you usually have a 5 on 5 or something. i dont mind an 8 on 8, i think that is a good number.

Sandmann · 08-20-2001, 04:39 AM

i dunno, 16 people sounds good to me. Just so all buildings are accesiblie like in a bombed out village map

Maverick · 08-21-2001, 12:34 AM

yea 8 on 8 is perfect for those kinds of maps

Maze · 08-21-2001, 03:44 AM

16 is good, but 32 or 50 is better for large wars (certainly MoH:AA is a game for some large war action).

DoD by the way supports 50 ppl in a server, but the lag is much larger then.

www.alliedassault.net

superdude · 08-22-2001, 03:27 AM

well then i support my idea of having bots at least in Omaha in mp to add a good efect. it wouldnt be fun with 16 or even 36 players, or 50. yes, even 50 would be un-fun due to the fact of how easy it would be for the defenders. 50 guys, too easy. so no matter how many players, bots in that level should be default.