| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|   Which is better........ |  
	|  |  |  
	| Junior Member 
				 
				Posts: 5 Join Date: Apr 2003        | 
   
		
            
             Which is better........ - 
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-02-2003, 06:02 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 Which rifle is better, 
 ADD REASONS AND COMMENTS PLEASE
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 130 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: England | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-02-2003, 06:04 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 Enfield has good power and accuracy, poor reloading speedNagant is quick for reloading and a little less weak
 
 Dont take my word for it i usually use M1
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 278 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Basement | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-03-2003, 12:38 AM
			
			
			
		 
               
 Quite simple the Nagent hits with the same power of a sniper rifle.
 The Lee Enfeild has the same power the mauser.
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Junior Member 
				 
				Posts: 23 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Sutton, Quebec, canada | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 10:26 AM
			
			
			
		 
               
 Lee enfield any day, quite simply because it has 10 rounds /clip, it doesnt matter if the nagant is the same power of a sniper, 1 hit to the upper chest with the lee will kill anyway it wont matter if its over kill like the sniper they both the the job done! also the nagant may reload a little bit faster since the nagant has to reload twice when the lee only needs to once, it more than compensates for the reload speed. |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 821 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: War is War just aint what it used to be | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 10:32 AM
			
			
			
		 
               
 I would say Garand is better. biggrin: |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Junior Member 
				 
				Posts: 23 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Sutton, Quebec, canada | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 10:39 AM
			
			
			
		 
               
 m1 garand is for peeps who think they are good and superior to smg players, sure it does require more skill but all it is is a 8 round smg a true rifle player is embarassed to be even SEEN with an m1, mauser, lee or nagant are the only way to go.  P.S , im a lee player |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 637 Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Out        | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 12:08 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 [quote="Bandit_Yo-mama":1edf9]m1 garand is for peeps who think they are good and superior to smg players, sure it does require more skill but all it is is a 8 round smg a true rifle player is embarassed to be even SEEN with an m1, mauser, lee or nagant are the only way to go.  P.S , im a lee player[/quote:1edf9]
 That is baloni. A KAR/Mosin/Lee requires more skill than a Garand does, I'll admit that. Comparing it to an SMG is nonsense. Certainly in realism and/or Spearhead. SMG to Garand is like Vodka is to beer.
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 637 Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Out        | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 12:09 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 And like MoHAA is to Spearhead.
 I voted M1 Garand,  biggrin:
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 130 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: England | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 12:18 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 When i first got spearhead, i was told the M1 is like for beginners and people who dont want to use SMG, Enfield and Nagant i was told were very similar but nagant was more accurate and Enfield was more accurate, dont take my word for it though, personally i prefer the Enfield.
 I know a real good rifleman with the nagant but not so many with the Enfield.
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 130 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: England | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 12:19 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 *EDIT*.......nagant was more accurate and Enfield was more powerful
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Posts: 429 Join Date: May 2003 Location: You ask too many questions... | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-07-2003, 07:38 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 It seems that the nagant is just a smidgen more powerful than the kar, but accuracy is the exact same with a good crosshair (I have a one pixel dot croshair) but enfield is very very nice because you get 10 shots  cool: |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Junior Member 
				 
				Posts: 23 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Sutton, Quebec, canada | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-08-2003, 09:30 AM
			
			
			
		 
               
 im an enfield rifleman, i consider myself to be a good one too, ive tried the nagant, but honestly, even though the nagant has a more powerful round, if you hit him in the chest it wont make a idfference if its more powerful or not, both will kill.
 that said, in the heat of battle being able to kill by hitting somone in the lower abdomen is a plus because its easier to get the kill.  but even with this, i'd take the enfield anyday, even if it had a 5 round clip, id still take it cause theres something abotu it thats bitchin.
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Captain 
				 
				Posts: 5,724 Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mostly Vermont. Also New Hampshire | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-09-2003, 11:22 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 I like the enfield. Its accurate, powerful and has a large magazine compacity. I am also really good with it or some reason |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Junior Member 
				 
				Posts: 18 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Canada | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-13-2003, 03:55 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 [quote="Bandit_Yo-mama":983d1]m1 garand is for peeps who think they are good and superior to smg players, sure it does require more skill but all it is is a 8 round smg a true rifle player is embarassed to be even SEEN with an m1, mauser, lee or nagant are the only way to go.  P.S , im a lee player[/quote:983d1]
 I don't really think you can really say that about an M1. I always find it very interesting how a skilled M1 soldier can kill a man in 1 or 2 shots and in many cases it takes a full clip of ammo for a skilled soldier to kill with a Thompson. It's also just a question of realism, in WWII only the selected few in a unit used SMG's and most people used the M1. In AA or SH almost everyone uses a Thompson. most people I've seen play online rely to heavy on the [see enemy hold firing button and hope the bullets hit the enemy method.] swordfight:
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	|  |  |  
	| Junior Member 
				 
				Posts: 18 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Canada | 
   
		
            
             
				
            
          
		
		
				
		
				05-13-2003, 03:57 PM
			
			
			
		 
               
 [quote="Bandit_Yo-mama":a6514]m1 garand is for peeps who think they are good and superior to smg players, sure it does require more skill but all it is is a 8 round smg a true rifle player is embarassed to be even SEEN with an m1, mauser, lee or nagant are the only way to go.  P.S , im a lee player[/quote:a6514]
 I don't really think you can really say that about an M1. I always find it very interesting how a skilled M1 soldier can kill a man in 1 or 2 shots and in many cases it takes a full clip of ammo for a skilled soldier to kill with a Thompson. It's also just a question of realism, in WWII only the selected few in a unit used SMG's and most people used the M1. In AA or SH almost everyone uses a Thompson. most people I've seen play online rely to heavy on the [see enemy hold firing button and hope the bullets hit the enemy method.]
 |  
	|  | 
			
			
			
				
			
			
			   |  |  |  
	
		
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
    
    
    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc. 
    vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
    
     
    
    
    © 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions  | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
     |