[Mr.Buttocks]

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,3 ... 65,00.html

[quote="Sky News":abea3]

MUTANT FISH FOUND

Freaky fish with human-looking faces are shocking internet users and television viewers in South Korea.

The striking video has left people stunned that any such animal could exist.

Choong Chong Today, a South Korean newspaper, videotaped the two fish in a pond in Chongju, about 90 miles south of capital Seoul.

Both of the weird-looking fish are said to be 19 years old.

According to the reports, the hybrids were born from a carp and a leather carp.

They are each 80cms long and 50cms in circumference.

The newspaper has quoted the owner of the fish as saying that their faces had started to look more and more human over the last couple of years.

[/quote:abea3]





WHATTHEFUCKSOMEONECALLOJSIMPSON!

[Zoner]

[img]http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/life/int-fish.jpg[/img]

happy:

[bukdez]

[img]http://www.bettycat.com/home/games/mol/images/bigfish.gif[/img]...

[Miscguy]

if doom 3 would have had a under water enemy, thats what they would have looked like.

[Pyro]

manfish rock:

[Arch]

i'd hit it oOo:

[Tripper]

Originally Posted by Miscguy

if doom 3 would have had a under water enemy, thats what they would have looked like.

rolf

[[DAS REICH] Blitz]

hah biggrin:

[Merlin122]

do they put out?

[[DAS REICH] Blitz]

Originally Posted by Merlin122

do they put out?

depends... eek:

[Doctor Duffy]

Ew...I wouldnt eat one of those for my life.

[Innoxx]

Probably the product of some kind of kinky Korean beastiality porn.


Joe loves a good fish.

[ninty]

Artificial Selection, if the story is infact true:


[quote="Carl Sagan":73efb]Let me tell you a story about one little phrase in the music of life on Earth. In the year 1185, the Emperor of Japan was a seven-year-old boy names Antoku. He was the nominal leader of a clan of samurai called the Heike, who were engaged in a long and bloody war with another samurai clan, the Genji. Each asserted a superior ancestral claim to the imperial throne. Their decisive naval encounter, with the Emperor on board ship, occurred at Danno-ura in the Japanese Inland Sea on April 24, 1185. The Heike were outnumbered, and outmaneuvered. Many were killed. The survivors, in massive numbers, threw themselves into the sea and drowned. The Lady Nii, grandmother of the Emperor, resolved that she and Antoku would not be captured by the enemy. What happened next is told in The Tale of the Heike:

The Emperor was seven years old that year but looked much older. He was so lovely that he seemed to shed a brilliant radiance and his long, black hair hung loose far down his back. With a look of surprise and anxiety on his face he asked the Lady Nii,"Where are you taking me?"

She turned to the youthful sovereign, with tears streaming down her cheeks, and ... comforted him, binding up his long hair in his dove-colored robe. Blinded with tears, the child sovereign put his beautiful, small hands together. He turned first to the East to say farewell to the god of Ise and then to the West to repeat the Nembutsu [a prayer to the Amida Buddha]. The Lady Nii took him tightly in her arms and with the words "In the depths of the ocean is our capitol," sank with him at last beneath the waves.

The entire Heike battle fleet was destroyed. Only forty-three women survived. These ladies-in-waiting of the imperial court were forced to sell flowers and other flavors to the fishermen near the scene of the battle. The Heike almost vanished from history. But a ragtag group of the former ladies-in-waiting and their offspring by the fisherfolk established a festival to commemorate the battle. It takes place on the twenty-fourth of April every year to this day. Fishermen who are the descendents of the Heike dress in hemp and black headgear and proceed to the Akama shrine which contains the mausoleum of the devoted Emperor. There they watch a play portraying the events that followed the Battle of Danno-ura. For centuries after, people imagined that they could discern ghostly samurai armies vainly striving to bail the sea, to cleanse the blood and defeat and humiliation.

The fishermen say the Heike samurai wander the bottoms of the Inland Sea still - in the form of crabs. There are crabs to be found here with curious markings on their backs, patterns and indentations that disturbingly resemble the face of a samurai. When caught, these crabs are not eaten, but are returned to the sea in commemoration of the doleful events at Danno-ura.

This legend raises a lovely problem. How does it come about that the face of a warrior is incised on the carapace of a crab? The answer seems to be that humans made the face. The patterns on the crab's shell are inherited. But among crabs, as among people, there are many different hereditary lines. Suppose that, by chance, among the distant ancestors of this crab, one arose with a pattern that resembled, even slightly, a human face. Even before the battle of Danno-ura, fishermen may have been reluctant to eat such a crab. In throwing it back, they set in motion an evolutionary process: If you are a crab and your carapace is ordinary, the humans will eat you. Your line will have fewer descendents. If your carapace looks a little like a face, they will throw you back. You will leave more descendents. Crabs had a substantial investment in the patterns on their carapaces. As the generations passed, of crabs and fishermen alike, the crabs with patterns that most resembled a samurai face survived preferentially until eventually there was produced not just a human face, not just a Japanese face, but the visage of a fierce and scowling samurai. All this has nothing to do with what the crabs want. Selection is imposed from the outside. The more you look like a samurai, the better are your chances of survival. Eventually, there come to be a great many samurai crabs.

This process is called artificial selection. In the case of the Heike crab it was effected more or less unconsciously by the fishermen, and certainly without any serious contemplation by the crabs. But humans have deliberately selected which plants and animals shall live and which shall die for thousands of years. We are surrounded from babyhood by familiar farm and domestic animals, fruits and trees and vegetables. Where do they come from? Were they once free-living in the wild and then induced to adopt a less strenuous life on the farm? No, the truth is quite different. They are, most of them, made by us.

Ten thousands years ago, there were no dairy cows or ferret hounds or large ears of corn. When we domesticated the ancestors of these plants and animals - sometimes creatures who looked quite different - we controlled their breeding. We made sure that certain varieties, having properties we consider desirable, preferentially reproduced. When we wanted a dog to help us care for sheep, we selected breeds that were intelligent, obedient and had some pre-existing talent to herd, which is useful for animals who hunt in packs. The enormous udders of diary cattle are the result of a human interest in milk and cheese. Our corn, or maize, has been bred for ten thousand generations to be more tasty and nutritious than its scrawny ancestors; indeed, it is so changed that it cannot even reproduce without human intervention.

The essence of artificial selection - for a Heike crab, a dog, a cow or an ear of corn - is this: Many physical and behavioral traits of plants and animals are inherited. They breed true. Humans, for whatever reason, encourage the reproduction of some varieties and discourage the reproduction of others. The variety selected for preferentially reproduces; it eventually becomes abundant; the variety selected against becomes rare and perhaps extinct.

But if humans can make new varieties of plants and animals, must not nature do so also? This related process is called natural selection. That life has changed fundamentally over the aeons is entirely clear from the alterations we have made in the beasts and vegetables during the short tenure of humans on Earth, and from fossil evidence. The fossil record speaks to us unambiguously of creatures that once were present in enormous numbers and that have now vanished utterly. Far more species have become extinct in the history of the Earth than exists today; they are the terminated experiments of evolution.

The genetic changes induced by domestication have occurred very rapidly. The rabbit was not domesticated until early medieval times (it was bred by French monks in the belief that new-born bunnies were fish and therefore exempt from the prohibitions against eating meat on certain days in the Church calendar); coffee in the fifteenth century; the sugar beet in the nineteenth century; and the mink is still in the earliest stages of domestication. In less than ten thousand years, domestication has increased the weight of wool grown by sheep from less than one kilogram of rough hairs to one or twenty kilograms of uniform, fine down; or the volume of milk given by cattle during a lactation period from a few hundred to a million cubic centimeters. If artificial selection can make such major changes in so short a period of time, what must natural selection, working over billion of years, be capable of? The answer is all the beauty and diversity of the biological world. Evolution is a fact, not a theory.[/quote:73efb]

Heike crab:
[url="http://chantal.nobilitas.com/java/evolhelp/pictures/Image5.gif"]http://chantal.nobilitas.com/java/evolh ... Image5.gif[/url]

This probably can't happen over just a few years, unless there are some other factors involved, but I think its the same sort of deal. The article doesn't really say if there were previous lines of fish that sort of looked human, or if suddenly the fish turned into human faces.

[Swill]

[img]http://www.eonline.com/On/101/BiggestCelebrityOops/GalleryOfGoofs/Images/gal.waterworld.jpg[/img] oOo:

[Airborne Butters]

[img]http://home.att.net/~sl.schofield/star_wars/admiral_ackbar_2.jpg[/img]