For those who want some more info on the battle, I advise you to check out this link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_jutland
Basically, I like to look at battles and analyze them, and this one has been bothering me. Both of the fleets were huge, and although this battle was signifigant, it was nowhere near as infuential as it could have been. What stuns me is Scheers actions. I cant understand what the hell he thought he was doing. He crossed the british T twice, he had his forces advance on the british fleet in a line formation i believe, which doesnt make sense to me at all. If the german imperial navy drew up to the royal navy and then had its ships make a 90 degree turn so that the entire fleet could fire "broadside" and engage the british fleet it quite possible that they would have won the battle, as their ships were, according to multiple sources, more heavily armored. Yet, neither commander seemed to seek out a decisive battle, and wats worse is like I said, what Scheer did makes absolutely no sense to me. Would anybody care to enlighten me? I know some of you here are interested in this kind of stuff, and/or have served in the amred forces.