all this word of "grunge" makes me want to kill myself. were gonna have kids with names like "50 cent" bragging about their hardcore grunge sigs. a sig is something that is suppose to be personal in my eyes, copying other peoples style.. well, nevermind anyone with half a brain can understand what im getting at.
Why exactly was kyles picture edited out? It was seemingly ok for sclass to have a sig containing a kid pissing on a soldier for a sig pic. But when someone uses a picture of a baby in an artistic sense its edited?
Who edited it and why i don't see anything wrong with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyck
But one of her fucking grandkids, pookie, rayray or lil-nub was probably slanging weed or rocks out of the house.
EDIT: Anti, don't post shit like that here or you'll join Strik0r very quickly, I'll see to that.[/quote:2f470]
gee i didnt know there was a borderline in art. its a fucking child, grow up. maybe if u would look past the fact that it is a naked baby (omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and see the meaning why i used it, u wouldnt be so harsh to punish something thats was purely innocent. id love to see u at an art show. OMG NAKED PEOPLE SOMEONE TAKE THIS DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! btw sclass is allowed to have a sig which has no meaning, other than to be crude of a kid pissing on a soldier with his penis showing. fucking sad
I edited it, and I would've edited Sclass's too if I could get rid of sigs.
It was offensive and inappropriate for this forum, Gerard. Plain as that. A naked baby with red spots what look like sores all along its side? C'mon, man, it doesn't take too much thinking to realize that it's a disturbing image.