Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > FPS Gaming General Discussion > MoH General Discussion
Reload this Page new MOH titles MP wishlist
MoH General Discussion General Discussion about Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, expansions and Pacific Assault

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
new MOH titles MP wishlist
Old
  (#1)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default new MOH titles MP wishlist - 05-20-2003, 04:03 PM

what would you guys like to see in MP in a new MOH title or expansion?

I'll probably get flamed for this, but I would like to see the stupid shotgun replaced by a Garand grenade. These were probably more common in the ETO than the shotgun. (of course the shotgun would be fine in MOH Pacific Assault).

Second, make both allied and axis n00b stick have a safety fuse like the M-203 in America's Army. Just to discourage n00bs from suicide nading with them. (the n00bs would help their team more if they didn't take away kills biggrin

If EA choose to put vehicles in MP I would very much like to see a training level like in America's Army, so that n00bs who don't know what the hell they're doing don't ram the precious vehicles into walls or run them off cliffs like in BF-1942. If you don't pass vehicle training, the server does not let you pick a driving or shooting position (you can still ride along if it's a jeep or halftrack).

Put classes in the "realism" mode, (this ones for you Gerard) so that everyone is not running around with machineguns.
Or just leave the option for an admin to activate classes regardless whether the server is running realism or stock.

Fell free to add your input, but please don't say stupid things that no one will ever CONSIDER putting in the game, like porn posters on the walls
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
DEVILS ADVOCATE is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 746
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
  Send a message via MSN to DEVILS ADVOCATE  
Default 05-20-2003, 04:11 PM

ummm lets see

1. A portable .30 cal would be nice biggrin:
2. A deploy for teh Bar
3. Being able to bring up an iron sight for say a secondary thing

Thats all for now evil:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 05-20-2003, 04:23 PM

[quote="DEVILS ADVOCATE":0bb08]ummm lets see

1. A portable .30 cal would be nice biggrin:
2. A deploy for teh Bar
3. Being able to bring up an iron sight for say a secondary thing

Thats all for now evil:[/quote:0bb08]

2 sounds like a good idea, so without the bipod you spray more but you are accurate with bipod.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Coleman is Offline
Major General
 
Coleman's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
   
Default 05-20-2003, 05:09 PM

CKR BEING DEFAULT!!!!!!11


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Akuma is Offline
Colonel
 
Akuma's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,386
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wut
 Send a message via ICQ to Akuma Send a message via AIM to Akuma Send a message via MSN to Akuma  
Default 05-20-2003, 05:37 PM

1. Class system.
2. Limiting weapons. (10% rocket, 10% shotgun, 10% sniper, 20% MG, 50% rifle)
3. Multiobjective maps, like RTCW.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
[MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 429
Join Date: May 2003
Location: You ask too many questions...
 Send a message via ICQ to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn Send a message via AIM to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn Send a message via MSN to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn  
Default 05-20-2003, 05:53 PM

1. That the new MOHAA will not be anything like America's Army and retain true to its current roots.

AA is a good game, but it is a DIFFERENT game.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Akuma is Offline
Colonel
 
Akuma's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,386
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wut
 Send a message via ICQ to Akuma Send a message via AIM to Akuma Send a message via MSN to Akuma  
Default 05-20-2003, 05:55 PM

[quote="[MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn":ba306]but it is a DIFFERENT game.[/quote:ba306]

No it isn't... It has completely unoriginal and mediocre multiplay.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Rott3n is Offline
Specialist
 
Posts: 369
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
   
Default 05-20-2003, 06:01 PM

I would like to see a bayonet added.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 05-20-2003, 06:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clubber
I would like to see a bayonet added.
yes, that and prone
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 05-20-2003, 06:32 PM

[quote="[MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn":c254d]1. That the new MOHAA will not be anything like America's Army and retain true to its current roots.

AA is a good game, but it is a DIFFERENT game.[/quote:c254d]

so you don't like the idea of limiting weapons?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
oOk.SpunkyPunkMonkey is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 16
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London, England
  Send a message via MSN to oOk.SpunkyPunkMonkey  
Default 05-20-2003, 07:10 PM

mohaa should be exactly how it is, just with more obj maps and no more of this shitty Spearhead realism crap angel:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 05-20-2003, 07:49 PM

[quote="oOk.SpunkyPunkMonkey":195e3]mohaa should be exactly how it is, just with more obj maps and no more of this shitty Spearhead realism crap angel:[/quote:195e3]

I agree that SH "realism" is shit but are you going to pay for an "expansion" that only puts in new maps and a few new skins?

EA has to change SOMETHING to release a new expansion or game.
Unfortunately they'll probably put vehicles in MP in Breakthrough, and they won't put in anything to keep n00bs from grabbing the vehicles and suiciding them into walls like in BF-1942
cry:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
[MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 429
Join Date: May 2003
Location: You ask too many questions...
 Send a message via ICQ to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn Send a message via AIM to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn Send a message via MSN to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn  
Default 05-20-2003, 09:29 PM

No . Don;t like the idea of limited weapons, or peepes complaining about them for that matter. I never really have any problems. Just deal
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 05-20-2003, 11:47 PM

[quote="[MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn":c02ea]No . Don;t like the idea of limited weapons, or peepes complaining about them for that matter. I never really have any problems. Just deal[/quote:c02ea]

I never said I would like to see that as the only option.
It would be something the admin could choose to turn on, whereas now some admins choose to just ban certain types of guns altogether.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
[MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 429
Join Date: May 2003
Location: You ask too many questions...
 Send a message via ICQ to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn Send a message via AIM to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn Send a message via MSN to [MOD]Gen.WikiWeaponn  
Default 05-21-2003, 12:35 AM

Actually, my biggest prob is serve's that make no mention of any mods and such, and i have to take the time to load and find out.

Not that loading takes all that long, but I don't really want to be wasting the time anyway, yknow?
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.