[[2ndS.S.]Enigma]

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! com'n U dont like shotugns! U odnt like Rockets U dont like Sniper rifles!!! COM'N!!! learn to counter them u n00b!!!!

------------------

[JwSPiTFiRE]

I think that where the bunker slots are where the mg 42s are placed to make that area a shadow so no snipers could see them, but see there fire from the guns therefor they would have to guess where to shoot. Or they could make the map hella foggy so no sniping is posable at all until u get close to the bunkers but its too late then when you getting fired at...... Solves everyones problem....

------------------


"Men, You are going to go to bed tonight with your gun. Your goin to give that gun a womans name! Because this is the only pussy you will be getting for a long time!"

[Caparzo-2]

well i don't mind all the team use sniper. there's a lot of way to counter them. but it's boriiiing seeing all snipe each other. where's the fun?? it ruins the game..

[Ydiss]

I will play this map some once I get the game and form an opinion then. I think it would be a good idea, but then I wanna see for myself.

Watch this space.

[madrebel]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by truppe:
I wonder if the guys on the beach on June 6th 1944 could vote for "no snipers"??

hmmmmm.......?
Truppe

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>no they wouldnt have dreamed of even trying to stop, line up a shot, then fire. they were to busy dying

rip

[[HOLY]Moses]

[2nd SS]ENiGMA was right on track.. you kids complain about bazookas, shotguns, sniper rifles, now you want invisible force fields? If I was your father I'd force you to enlist. The ONLY unfair advantage anybody has is when they cheat (using codes/patches/hacks, etc). For every one "unfair" advantage you beleive the springfield presents, I could list one counter disadvantage to using it.

[Caparzo-2]

here we go again....

i'm sure there's no harm done in class limit. you will still got sniper, bazooka or shotgun.

[[HEL]Killa123]

a invisble barrier around the bunkers=LaMe sorry to say but the no snipers idea is Perfect

[poseyj]

i agree with the no snipers for allies, and even for axis too. but the invisible barrier, i don't really agree with that. the allies need to be able to shoot and have a chance of hitting something. it would be hard still for allies without a sniper rifle!

to the people that say 'suck it up and live with it' with the sniper issue, they have never been up against 5 snipers that are actually skilled, you won't get anywhere on a wide open level unless you snipe them. cmon guys this is about balancing the gameplay. dont accept mediocrity from 2015. these things should have already been in the game.

[Oddball]

I don't think the maybe a limit on the sniper rifle would be better? 1 per team.

The invis wall thing I don't really agree with because it would make the MGer invincible and that would be gay.

[Caparzo-2]

well maybe not one per team. how much is one team? maybe like 1 sniper for 5 person, and so on ( feel like bargaining in the market ) what's ur opinion?

[Mange]

Sheesh...how about we throw helmets on Omaha...no weapons at all...

I think it is fine the way it is. I agree that it is stupid for the allies or axis either one to have too many snipers, but if either one does, the objectives cannot be met. Snipers die in the bunkers. Period. On both sides. I have hardly seen allied snipers up on top. Why? because when they get into the bunker they face plenty of SMG's, MP-40's, and shottys(and grenades ). The sniper rifle is mainly for bu of the main attack and keeping your machine gunners and shotties safe into the bunker. If too many are using it then the objective won't be won. You may rack up a bunch of kills, but the team will not win. And the idea of the objective maps is teamplay and winning the team objective. I have been on the winning axis side plenty of times...I have played on servers where the axis team was able to give plenty of hell to the allied team. If they blew the guns...they earned it. And I never heard one complaint about snipers. Maybe if people would learn how to play the game and maps, then we would see less posts like this...

------------------
~Mange~

[Gobeler]

OMG i can't believe there is a discussion about changing the game! IT came out what? 36 hours ago? my god, the sniper rifle doesn't cause problems for the game. For one, i do just fine on the map with the m1 garand, which is the weapon that the allies all had during D-day. Second, it's just as easy to snipe the allies if your an axis. The Axis have bunkers to hide behind and plus with the map as multi-layered as it is, they can run down to beach side and not get hit. So everyone please stop this stupid thread of mindless bitching (sorry for the language) and just go enjoy this magnificant game.

[Syphon]

The sniping thing can be a problem. And as many of you say it cant be countered, well, it can...

In the SP Omaha, If you aint crouching behind a hedgehog, then you be dead bitch! (Sorry for the random ebonics)
SO...what Im trying to get at is that in the Single Player Omaha, not only did you have both bunkers with both MG42's with a man on them, but you also had the krauts behind the sandbags firing at you with MG's...

It just requires VERY hard teamwork on the Axis side. I mean, its even easier in Multiplayer, with the freaking beach being only like 1/4 of the real size.

------------------


[This message has been edited by Syphon (edited January 24, 2002).]

Hey limiting Snipers to 1 per team is better than having the whole team snipers...AGREE TO THE PATITON////