My game seems to work fine, i just dont use the highest graphics settings. I get a laugh outta people who say: " My game doesnt run 300FPS at 1600x1400, all graphics as high as they can possibly go!! what am i to do??" - uh? Perhaps turn down the graphics?

You have to understand that when they make a game, they dont develop it for todays computers. They develop it for tommrows. If every game was to be run on a 500 MHz computer, than games wouldnt graphically advance, and we may as well stick to the good old pack-man engine. I run everything on medimum, on 1024 x 768, and on Omaha get 30 FPS. This is on my crappy machine. you guys out there running 1.5 GH computers, why not turn down your graphics a tad, and experience 75 FPS on Omaha?

Im sorry to sound harsh, but that seems to be the only answer, and im tired of reposting it 50 times to everyone.

About bad scripting.. Ill admit that the net code was a little crappy at first, but with the addition on the V1.10 patch, they seem to have fixed it very nicly. Other than that the scripting is done very well. Don't tell me that Electrionic Arts (the biggest game company in the world) can't scrip, and dont tell me that 2015 cant either. If they couldnt, EA would have never published the game for them. You have to face the facts. You either need to turn down your graphics, or buy that new computer. No use in bitching about it all day.

------------------
~Blaze

[This message has been edited by TheBlazer (edited January 27, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by TheBlazer (edited January 27, 2002).]

[Pugilist]

Anyone who bashes this game and calls the programmers "amateur" is nuts. The graphics and gameplay for this game are outstanding and blow wolfenstein out of the water. I realise this is mainly my opinion, but I bet the majority here at AA.com agree with me.
If ya don't like the game, and think the programmers suck there is a simple solution...return the game, and get something else. You are the one who will be missing out.

------------------

[SS.SGW~Siggi]

I did have a P3-933 with GF3 and MoH ran fine with full detail at 1600x1200. I've now upgraded to an XP1600 and it seems to run a bit faster.
On my #2 PC it runs full detail at 1024x768. That's with a P3-600 and GeForce-DDR.

The only place I've ever noticed stutter is the beginning of the mission where the 88mm is burning...that seems to affect everyone.

------------------
SSDivisionWikingSGW

[Mustang]

Im pretty well much sitting around at 20 - 30 fps and drop to about 15fps - 8 fps during the bigger fights. But anyone who stays above 15fps should be pretty happy. It still runs smooth at that speed, once you get below 15 it starts to look ugly.

Funnily enough, I get better speeds at 1024x768 than I do at 800x600. I figured my GF3 works better at higher res.

------------------


Lady Astor: "Winston, if I were your wife I'd put poison in your coffee."

Winston Churchill: "Nancy, if I were your husband I'd drink it."

[NOLF]

Do CC and BB take returns on PC games if they don't run correctly? I'm checking both places today to compare prices.

[arcane_shot]

anyone else have a problem like he did? cuz that's my computer right there, same thing...is it that slow on that kinda computer?

[Frost]

Bye

------------------
-Frost

[The_Guy]

on my comp it runs excellent and i have a 833 mhz

------------------

[CoNtEmPt]

Thers no frikin way it runs "completeley excellent" posta screen shot with your FPS on it. Its impossible......The map has some dam bad mapping and coding and it will never run "excellent"
If excellent is 25 to 30 fps then you have got to kidding.
Mine dips to 15 Frames some times and i think that is rediculous.

------------------

[Dice]

i was using older drivers to play the game
it ran great on Medium settings
i have a 900 mhz 128 mb ram 32mb TNT2 card

then i installed newer drivers to see if i could run it well on max settings.... it now runs poorer that it did before on MIN. settings

weird...

[Pharaoh]

Hey there...

I have a 500 mhz, 384 meg ram, a Voodoo 3 card (which at first I thought I would have to replace since the MP demo didn't show me the menu system...)

But I bought the full version, everything works fine.. Granted it may not be as smooth as some other high end systems, but I have had no problems with 'unbearable' gaming conditions. I get good graphics with good playability. As far as multiplayer, I get laggy sometimes even though I'm on cable.. I'm not sure as to my framerate as I've never done the command to show what I'm getting..

It does seem strange that folks with highend systems are having problems yet folks with mediocre systems don't seem to be having any issues...

[BigDaddyWiz]

and admit that they cant program. in the one post about omaha fps, elmagoo replied that you would need a 2ghz machine to run it decently. I guess EA expects everyone to have bought a computer in the past week. There should be no need for that. Look at RTCW beach map in multiplayer(tons of gunfire, explosions, huge amts of players on screen etc and no slowdowns) First of all, if that would be the case, they should put higher system requirements on the box and not steal from people who buy their product and expect it to run correctly.

i've done tests myself like many others: turn down every possible setting, but it still runs like shit. not acceptable. i have a 1.1ghz geforce 2 machine, and the game runs just as bad in complete min settings as it does in maxed out settings. thats not how it should work. how do you think people with 500mhz machines feel?(dont tell me you get 30+ frames with slower machines on omaha unless you post the screenshot here).

I'm just glad i know the person i bought the game off of, so i can return it and get my money back. screw this shit, i'm tired of worrying about this when theres no way to fix it.

Bash me all you want, i'll be playing wolfenstein.

[This message has been edited by BigDaddyWiz (edited January 27, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by BigDaddyWiz (edited January 27, 2002).]

[intrestedviewer]

ok pointless yet insulting *puts on cheff hat and aprin*, needs a little bit more bitch



[This message has been edited by intrestedviewer (edited January 27, 2002).]