Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > FPS Gaming General Discussion > MoH General Discussion
Reload this Page medics and guns
MoH General Discussion General Discussion about Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, expansions and Pacific Assault

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#16)
criscc is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 5
Join Date: Jan 2002
   
Default 02-10-2002, 10:59 AM

Medics don't have guns because there only there to treat the injured and not to fight. Also because they don't have guns they are not allowed to be shot by the opposition because they oppose no threat without a gun. O.K.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
criscc is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 5
Join Date: Jan 2002
   
Default 02-10-2002, 10:59 AM

Medics don't have guns because there only there to treat the injured and not to fight. Also because they don't have guns they are not allowed to be shot by the opposition because they oppose no threat without a gun. O.K.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
General Waffen is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 13
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C, Canada
   
Default 02-10-2002, 11:42 AM

I think the medic should have a gun because in *sniper town* after i destoryed the tank 5 guys come out of the house and kills the medic. and i omaha the medic at the shingle doesnt have a gun. and when he tries to run up to the bunker he gets wasted. IMO i think they should have at least a side arm.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
Bazooka_Joe is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 12,585
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY, USA
 Send a message via ICQ to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via AIM to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via MSN to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via Yahoo to Bazooka_Joe  
Default 02-11-2002, 01:08 AM

During WWII, Germany breached the contract of the Geneva Conventions by using Mustard Gas on our allies. Since then, I don't believe any nerve gases are allowed to be used in war, legally speaking.

BTW, yah what they said: Medics do not carry weapons in war. Their main purpose is to help the wounded. That's why it's also against the Geneva Convention laws of war to shoot at a military truck with a "red cross" on the side.

~ST_Bazooka_Joe
"You ate the -ony!!"

------------------
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
[spiewalk] is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 693
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N.Vancouver B.C. Canada
 Send a message via ICQ to [spiewalk]  
Default 02-11-2002, 01:13 AM

That is true in the case of war, but with ww2 Germany wasn't just in war they were undergoing global domination. It's like the game of risk, you wanna take over the map and if you end up feeling sorry for anyone come the next turn, you may not be winning anymore.

------------------
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
GEN.Rommel.CN is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 168
Join Date: Jan 2002
   
Default 02-11-2002, 01:42 AM

in war medics are NON COMBATANTS.
they are there to treat the wounded but they have the rights as anyone does to defend themselves.
they do in rare cases carry weapons, but the shit really has to hit the fan for that.

------------------


*Comming soon...The COMMIE NAZI Homepage*
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
GEN.Rommel.CN is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 168
Join Date: Jan 2002
   
Default 02-11-2002, 01:46 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by CAPT._CAVEMANN:
i just wondering, in war do you have time to think... i cant shoot him, he's a medic,?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

if i would be shooting anything that moves.
and if a medic is moving he is as good as dead.



------------------


*Comming soon...The COMMIE NAZI Homepage*
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
Mosquito is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,035
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
   
Default 02-11-2002, 08:45 AM

Capt Caveman, in a real war, a wounded soldier is worth twice as much as a dead one. Wounded soldiers have to be cared for, and their screams of pain are demoralizing to their fellow unit members. It's basic Clauswitzian theory, dead soldiers return resources to the battlegroup (ammunition, guns, supplies, etc..), wounded soldiers use up resources. War is merely a battle of attrition, the side that can provide the most resources (of all kinds), wins. Allied losses early in the war were much higher than Axis losses, but the Allies could afford to pour more resources into the war than the Axis could. They had the manpower and manufacturing might to run Germany (and Japan) out of men, fuel, weapons and supplies therefore, the Allies won.

------------------
August 19, 1942
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
newbieassulted is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 920
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Camping behind a rock
   
Default 02-12-2002, 12:01 AM

My uncle was a medic, according to what i was told by him... he didnt have any weapon but morphine, and thats not a weapon

------------------
Starcraft is still good...... really I mean it.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
Kakorott is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 166
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: hamden, ohio usa
 Send a message via ICQ to Kakorott  
Default 02-12-2002, 12:27 AM

in real war medics carry guns like i said before they carry 9mm i know this on a first hand basis also medics in the field are not protected only the fla's(field ambulances) are protected under geneva not the soldiers and the only time those vehicals are protected is if they bear a large red cross but noone really cares bout that in war (just us dumb americans) so this should stop the issue medics do carry weapons at all times

------------------
Why is Jesus the almighty father? Was I forgotten? The son of Christ!
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#26)
Sn!peR is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 86
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philly, YO!!!
   
Default 02-12-2002, 01:32 AM

No one shoots medics, eh?....Someone make me a medic skin!!!
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#27)
Sn!peR is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 86
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philly, YO!!!
   
Default 02-12-2002, 01:32 AM

No one shoots medics, eh?....Someone make me a medic skin!!!


------------------



  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#28)
Xplorer is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 15
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Omaha Beach, Charlie Sector
 Send a message via ICQ to Xplorer  
Default 02-12-2002, 01:58 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>I think...not sure....but I think the Geneva Conventions state that by 'rules of war' a medic cannot carry fireamrs into combat.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

LOL
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#29)
jonesy-the-cat is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 147
Join Date: Jan 2002
   
Default 02-12-2002, 06:03 AM

Okay, let me get this straight. You can kill people, that's okay, just don't kill medics. Riiiight.

What are you gonna do, arrest me? I'll probably die anyway!

The only reason someone would not kill a medic is so he can keep making wounded soldiers (instead of dead ones) who use resources.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#30)
JimbobMojo is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 57
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
   
Default 02-12-2002, 09:57 AM

medics should have bazookas. that would be sweet! anyone who doesnt agree must be retarded.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.