Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Offtopic
Reload this Page Nuclear War.
Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#31)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 08-27-2004, 07:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
We shouldn't be analyzing the photos...those are just done for effect.

What we should focus on are the stats. And if their true, then there may be a point to a video.
thats what i wanted people to take into effect.. yet 90 % has failed to do so..
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#32)
Drew is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,292
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Drew  
Default 08-27-2004, 09:22 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
We shouldn't be analyzing the photos...those are just done for effect.

What we should focus on are the stats. And if their true, then there may be a point to a video.
First of all, about half of those are taken from a VERY old (1970s, IIRC) advanced anatomy textbook. A buddy of mine used the textbook as a reference for his biology analysis paper on the effects alcohol and drug abuse have on a fetus.

That being said, I can pretty much guarantee you that none of those pictures are even scarcely related to the depleted uranium left behind from ammunition. In fact, the residue left from this type of ammunition is so slight that a stock Geiger counter won't even register it above the natural radiation levels created by sunlight, etc.

Your computer, cell phone, laptop, PDA, cordless telephone, television [et al] generate more radiation than a depleted uranium round.

This is just an example of a bored 14-year old with half the facts or some dumbshit, hippy freshman science teacher who decided to make a "cool" flash video regarding something about which he is utterly fucking clueless.

Source of my information is the three hour debate I was required to participate in for my Politics 211 course, so I apologize that I don't have links. If anyone feels like looking all this up, feel free to link it.



Chairperson, Coastal Carolina Students for Ron Paul 2008
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#33)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default 08-27-2004, 09:23 PM

That's why I said ignore the pictures. oOo:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#34)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 08-27-2004, 09:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
That's why I said ignore the pictures. oOo:
lol.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#35)
Drew is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,292
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Drew  
Default 08-27-2004, 09:55 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
That's why I said ignore the pictures. oOo:
I caught that, which is why I also discounted whatever source he used to gather his information on the effects of depleted uranium ammunition. About the only fact in his cute little presentation was the half-life of depleted uranium.

Some information on why DU ammunition isn't harmful:

[quote:25b78]
An alpha particle consists of two protons and two neutrons and is positively charged (+2). Most alpha particles are not energetic enough to penetrate skin and are not considered an external hazard.[/quote:25b78]

[quote:25b78]
238U—which by weight makes up almost 99.8 percent of DU—is an alpha emitter. The radiological half-life of 238U or the time required for 238U to lose 50 percent of its activity by decay is 4.5 x 109 years. 238U decays into two short-lived "daughters:" thorium-234 (234Th, half-life of 24.1 days) and protactinium-234m (234mPa, half-life of 1.17 minutes)—which are beta and gamma emitters. Because of this constant nuclear decay process, very small amounts of these "daughters" are always present in DU. 235U (half-life of 7.0 x 108 years) decays into thorium-231 (231Th, half-life 25.5 hours), which decays into protactinium-231 (231Pa, half-life of 3.25 x 104 years) and then to actinium with a half-life of 21.8 years, resulting in alpha and beta particles and gamma rays.[196] The 238U and 235U chains continue through a series of isotopes before terminating in stable, non-radioactive lead isotopes 206Pb and 207-Pb, respectively.[/quote:25b78]

[quote:25b78]
"Depleted uranium," the byproduct of the enrichment process, has about 0.002 percent 234U, 0.2 percent 235U and 99.8 percent 238U, and about 60 percent of natural uranium’s radioactivity. In the gaseous diffusion process, uranium hexafluoride (UF6), a gaseous compound of uranium and fluorine, is separated into two fractions—one enriched in 235U and one depleted in 235U. The depleted fraction is then chemically transformed into a uranium metal stock. This is the first stage at which the depleted material is in the state necessary for further processing by ammunition manufacturers.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) defines "depleted uranium" as uranium in which the percentage of the 235U isotope’s weight is less than 0.711 percent. Military specifications mandated by the Department of Defense (DoD) require that the percentage of 235U be less than 0.3 percent, but in actual practice, DoD uses DU with a 235U content of approximately 0.2 percent.[197] DU is 40 percent less radioactive than the uranium in the raw uranium-bearing ores found in nature; but its material content is still uranium. The specific activity of DU is, therefore, about 0.4 µCi/g. All isotopes of uranium are essentially identical chemically and, since depleted and natural uranium are just different mixtures of the same three isotopes, they have the same chemical properties.

The Department of Energy has recently reported that the DU used by DOD in its armor plates (found only on "Heavy Armor" Abrams tank models) may contain trace levels of transuranics (neptunium, plutonium, and americium) and fission products (technetium-99). The DU used in munitions may also contain these materials. The military services are testing the stocks of DU munitions and parts. The levels of transuranics and fission products found during testing of the material used for producing armor packages are in minute quantities (the picocurie/gram range) and result in less than a one percent increase in the internal radiation dose. These evaluations indicate that measures designed to protect personnel from the DU itself are adequate to protect them from the traces of transuranics and fission products as well.[/quote:25b78]



Chairperson, Coastal Carolina Students for Ron Paul 2008
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#36)
Conscript is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Internet police
  Send a message via AIM to Conscript Send a message via MSN to Conscript  
Default 08-27-2004, 10:17 PM

So wtf was the point in short showing us this oOo:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#37)
Drew is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,292
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Drew  
Default 08-27-2004, 10:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conscript
So wtf was the point in short showing us this oOo:
He just didn't know any better. Not his fault, really. He just didn't take any time to research or form his own opinion on it and allowed it to do as intended - influence his opinion on such things.



Chairperson, Coastal Carolina Students for Ron Paul 2008
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#38)
Maplegyver is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 8,033
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: motherland
   
Default 08-27-2004, 10:18 PM

^ he is the side affect of depleated uranium
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#39)
S1N1ST3R 3.0 is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 60
Join Date: Aug 2004
  Send a message via MSN to S1N1ST3R 3.0  
Default 08-27-2004, 11:23 PM

[quote="Mr. maple":a154d]^ he is the side affect of depleated uranium[/quote:a154d]
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#40)
Mustard Man is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 35
Join Date: Aug 2004
   
Default 08-27-2004, 11:25 PM

America sucks.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#41)
Merlin122 is Offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 4,860
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Greater Philidelphia Area
  Send a message via AIM to Merlin122 Send a message via MSN to Merlin122 Send a message via Yahoo to Merlin122  
Default 08-27-2004, 11:27 PM

[quote="Mustard Man":7971a]America sucks.[/quote:7971a]


I bet you're one of those kids who hates people because its cool. oOo:


i'm still going to lynch you, btw.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#42)
S1N1ST3R 3.0 is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 60
Join Date: Aug 2004
  Send a message via MSN to S1N1ST3R 3.0  
Default 08-27-2004, 11:27 PM

[quote="Mustard Man":b83c1]America sucks.[/quote:b83c1]





hahahahahahahhahahah eek:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#43)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 08-27-2004, 11:28 PM

Now correct me if im wrong here noc, i dont want to get into a fight about fucking uranium shells.

This article claims it has a 60 % radioActive comparision to its un depleted cousin.

Now this stuff is "harmless when in shells true" What I think is true is that this stuff "becomes dangerous" when it forms into the aerosol form, which happens on impact, this by product of the shot is the dangerous part The stuff that causes radio activity.

I would hope the scientists and all the arthors behind this stuff are not raving fanatical idiots. I don't want to fight about this shit either just trying to clear things up.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#44)
KTOG is Offline
Captain
 
KTOG's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,824
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Robertplantsville
   
Default 08-27-2004, 11:29 PM

I'm agree with SH on this. It may not penetrate skin but it sure as hell can get into your lungs.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#45)
Mustard Man is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 35
Join Date: Aug 2004
   
Default 08-27-2004, 11:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTOG
I'm agree with SH on this. It may not penetrate skin but it sure as hell can get into your lungs.
you said penetrate
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.