[Short Hand]

Originally Posted by Bleuachdu

Kerry won the debate, but not on substance. He delivered his points eloquently in a cool calm and collected manner. Bush looked distracted, hesitant and tired. Kerry certainly didn't completely dominate Bush as some of you seem to think; in fact Kerry was inconsistent (who'd have guessed?) with his overall theme and message. Bush stood strong with his points, which will score high with a lot of people. Kerry tried to bust him on this with the "evaluative approach" which was somewhat trivial.

Still, in the end, Kerry edges Bush in this debate. If GW would have had his act together and not run out of material near the end, he would've been the victor. Kerry also "wins" this debate by not losing. In other words, If he would've gotten killed tonight, the election would've essentially been over.

Short Hand - you're a smelly putrid cunt. Enjoy your time on earth as an average, marginal, and vapid sheep.

PS - I'm really sick of youth centered liberal elitism... I had a good conversation with my roommate about this the other day. I may start a thread next few days when i can put my thoughts together.

can you pick out a pair of glasses, ones that will increase my brain power to that of yours ?,. youth centered liberal elitism ? LOL what a label you douche.

EDIT, around here i see just as many Bush youth supporters + a large amount of people who just aren't informed and do not care about it, they pick the day of type thing. It is pretty much a even neck to neck thing. Simply claiming that this new group of youth are everywhere iss not true at all.