Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Offtopic
Reload this Page Iraq's Saddam Says He Is Unmoved by U.S. Threats
Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Iraq's Saddam Says He Is Unmoved by U.S. Threats
Old
  (#1)
Pfc.Green is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,849
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bothell, Washington, U.S.A
   
Default Iraq's Saddam Says He Is Unmoved by U.S. Threats - 08-08-2002, 10:14 AM

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - President Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites) said on Thursday he was not frightened by U.S. threats to topple his administration and warned that those who attacked Iraq would be "digging their own graves." (sure saddam sure :roll: )

Marking the anniversary of the end of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, Saddam called for "equitable dialogue" with the United Nations :roll: ( news - web sites) but made no new offers in response to international calls for weapons inspectors to be allowed back into Iraq.

what they dont tell you is after his speech he went into his office and called his mother, telling her "I shit my pants i'm so scared,mommy help me"
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
BallisticWookie is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,202
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Queensland, Australia
 Send a message via ICQ to BallisticWookie  
Default 08-08-2002, 10:30 AM

Well, if he truly isnt scared, he should be. I dont think Bush is screwing around, and an attack will certainly come, the sooner the better as far as I am concerned. Saddam has been in power for far too long and his "administration (dictatorship)" needs to be eradicated along with him.
Simply letting in weapons inspectors isnt going to change anything. 1992 - 2002, plenty of time to construct secret labs to develop weapons. I think the Europeans are being completely thick headed in their false hopes of being able to freely get weapons inspectors inside Iraq.

They will once again be fucked around by Saddam and his goons and find nothing. Sure, Saddam welcomes them with open arms but his toes are crossed and he is laughing inside saying "these Western pig dogs are more stupid than I could have imagined". Dont trust an Arab, they'll stab you in the back, THAT has been proven.... Kuwait gets invaded now they are in bed with Saddam along with Saudi Arabia who called America in the FIRST PLACE to intervene, touching really.

But dont mind my ramblings, I love watching people getting fucked over by murdering bastards, hilarious stuff really.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 08-08-2002, 10:38 AM

i'm sure that the fact he could launch a few SCUDs into their capital loaded with some bio weapons doesn't help them support taking him out.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Bean 2 is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,993
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
   
Default 08-08-2002, 01:15 PM

And if Bush doesnt attack(which i highly doubt), Blair will. And he'll talk Bush into attacking anyway. Saddams not scared.....HAhhahahahahahahahahaahahahah. I bet hes shitting in his pants right now hiding in the same bunker as Osamas rotting corpse.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 08-08-2002, 01:19 PM

nah, he's probably sitting in a school or a hospital where he knows he's safe. that's what he does, he'll build weapons labs underneath hospitals, put SAM sites at mosques, in residential neighborhoods etc.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Low spark is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,745
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Inside your head
   
Default 08-08-2002, 01:44 PM

Sorry to rain on the parade, I don't like Saddam, but I don't think the US can really justify invading Iraq. The logic of "he may have or may be devoloping weapon of mass destruction" just doesn't fly. Should we invade China first, they are a bigger threat than Iraq. Mabye we should invade Russia, to make sure all their nukes and biological weopons are destroyed. Just because Cheney and Pappa Bush have a personal vendetta, is no reason to start a war. The reasoning I'm hearing from Washington, says to me, someone ought to invade the US and replace Cheney/Bush because they have access to nukes and bio weopons. I strongly suggest that people step back and think it through. War is wrong, and killing innocent people because you want to prove you have a bigger dick than someone else is stupid.

I know that you all think I'm wrong, but somebody has to speak out against this kind of thing, I am an American, I and I am proud of what Amerca stands for, I don't want to see America become a state that uses its military to "remove" whomever, they don't happen to like at the time, from power.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Pfc.Green is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,849
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bothell, Washington, U.S.A
   
Default 08-08-2002, 01:53 PM

I bet when saddam is found hiding in a corner by our troops he'll be protecting himself by using two small children as human shiels.

We are'nt going to go into Iraq to kill inoccents low spark, and we are'nt the only ones who want Sodamn gone, like bean said Blair wants him out also, so do groups in Iraq and most likely the Iraqi people themselve its just that if they speak out against him they die.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Pfc.Green is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,849
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bothell, Washington, U.S.A
   
Default 08-08-2002, 01:54 PM

I bet when saddam is found hiding in a corner by our troops he'll be protecting himself by using two small children as human shiels.

We are'nt going to go into Iraq to kill inoccents low spark, and we are'nt the only ones who want Sodamn gone, like bean said Blair wants him out also, so do groups in Iraq and most likely the Iraqi people themselve its just that if they speak out against him they die.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
SW-14 is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,266
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
  Send a message via AIM to SW-14  
Default 08-08-2002, 02:12 PM

From historyguy.com, regarding the Gulf War:
[quote:991a9]CONSEQUENCES OF CONFLICT:

1. Saddam's second war of foreign conquest ended even worse than the first one. Iraq again stood defeated with the liberation of Kuwait.
2. Despite the crushing defeat and subsequent Shiite and Kurdish rebellions, Saddam's government retained a strong grip on power in Iraq.

3. As a result of the cease-fire terms, Iraq had to accept the imposition of "no-fly zones" over her territory and United Nations weapons inspection teams sifting through her nuclear and other weapons programs.

4. The economic and trade sanctions begun during the war continue to the present day, contributing to severe economic hardship in Iraq. Some reports say hundreds of thousands of children have died due to the sanctions. There are no indications that the government or military suffer undo hardships.
[/quote:991a9]

To me, it seems that Iraq has violated the terms they agreed to, and must be dealt with accordingly.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Low spark is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,745
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Inside your head
   
Default 08-08-2002, 02:17 PM

[quote="Pfc.Green":899be]I bet when saddam is found hiding in a corner by our troops he'll be protecting himself by using two small children as human shiels.

We are'nt going to go into Iraq to kill inoccents low spark, and we are'nt the only ones who want Sodamn gone, like bean said Blair wants him out also, so do groups in Iraq and most likely the Iraqi people themselve its just that if they speak out against him they die.[/quote:899be]

We aren't going to kill innocents!?!? We aren't the only ones that want him out, Blair?,the Iraq people?
I'm sorry, but really can't but this as justification for the US to Invade a sovereign nation. We are being bombarded with propaganda to make us believe that such an action is right. My father did not fight in WWII so that his country could go in, remove a government, and replace them with a puppet government that they could control. AGAIN I say it, I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN. I do not want to see Cheney/Bush destroy what our people spent 200+ years building, just because they prove that they are big boys.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Pfc.Green is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,849
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bothell, Washington, U.S.A
   
Default 08-08-2002, 02:38 PM

Low spark do not twist my words I did not say innocents wouldnt die, its war people die.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
Low spark is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,745
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Inside your head
   
Default 08-08-2002, 02:55 PM

[quote="Pfc.Green":94b96]Low spark do not twist my words I did not say innocents wouldnt die, its war people die.[/quote:94b96]

Sorry Green got carried away, I was brought up by a man who saw way too many people die in WWII, innocent and not so innocent. My father has had a tremendous influence on my believes about war. So, when/if Cheney/Bush decide to invade a Iraq, don't expect everyone to jump on the bandwagon. It is wrong, It makes the US no better than any other imperialistic country. The arguements being used, could be used to invade any country in the world, which means, does every country in the world have to bend to Americas will or face invasion? Think longterm , don't think shorterm.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
FWB is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 342
Join Date: Apr 2002
   
Default 08-08-2002, 03:04 PM

[quote="Bean 2":2e7b6]And if Bush doesnt attack(which i highly doubt), Blair will. And he'll talk Bush into attacking anyway. Saddams not scared.....HAhhahahahahahahahahaahahahah. I bet hes shitting in his pants right now hiding in the same bunker as Osamas rotting corpse.[/quote:2e7b6]

lol. Mate, Blair is too busy having his own country telling him they don't want to take part. Our troops have been pulled out of Afghanistian, while the population grows more and more fed up with the gung-ho approach that the Bushs seem to take.

Besides which, if I was in Saddam's position I certainly wouldn't be worried. Even the US's closest allies, including key Arabic nations, are refusing to take part. The scary thing is that there is talk in the US, even if it is by a minority, of taking control of Saudi Arabia.

As for bin Laden... you think he's dead? More importantly, do you think it matters whether he is? bin Laden was a face the western media placed to an invisible army, a huge army of people ready, and eager, to die.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
FWB is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 342
Join Date: Apr 2002
   
Default 08-08-2002, 03:08 PM

EDIT: Triple post. Sorry. Where's the delete button?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
FWB is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 342
Join Date: Apr 2002
   
Default 08-08-2002, 04:26 PM

EDIT: Triple post. Sorry.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.