Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history. |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
|

04-11-2005, 01:00 PM
yes but think about this. America was founded because of the fact tat britain was restricting our rights, and now 200 years later we do the same to our own citizens. Come on now. What if the majority voted to kill of all the jews? Would u still be for it then?
As a wise man once said, "Think afore you speak" oOo:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 3,192
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City KS
|

04-11-2005, 04:13 PM
Trunks,please read the Bill of Rights, then tell me which one is being violated by not allowing gay marriage.
**Practicing the dark art of turn signal usage since 1976.**
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 967
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Decatur-Atlanta, GA
|

04-11-2005, 04:28 PM
America was also founded as a nation under god. Thats what the white represents.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
|

04-11-2005, 05:20 PM
negative. I have said this once, and I will say it again, and again, and yet again. Religion should never, ever mix with state. People should have the right to worship any religion they want, or none at all if they so choose.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
As u can see, the only reason people are against it are because they personally think its disgusting, which, is not a suitable reason for restricting ones rights, or because of religious reasons, but as it clearly states in the very first ammendment, since there is no law on religion, there should not be a law restricting something for a religous reason.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
|

04-11-2005, 05:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
As u can see, the only reason people are against it are because they personally think its disgusting,
|
sodomy is leet
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
|

04-11-2005, 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
As u can see, the only reason people are against it are because they personally think its disgusting,
|
sodomy is leet
|
I never said it was, and in my opinion it is far from it, but I also understand people are different, and to restrict ones rights just because of a "difference" is, first and foremost, morally wrong, second of all, against the constitution. eek:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
|

04-11-2005, 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
As u can see, the only reason people are against it are because they personally think its disgusting,
|
sodomy is leet
|
I never said it was, and in my opinion it is far from it, but I also understand people are different, and to restrict ones rights just because of a "difference" is, first and foremost, morally wrong, second of all, against the constitution. eek:
|
in many states it is illegal.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
|

04-11-2005, 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
As u can see, the only reason people are against it are because they personally think its disgusting,
|
sodomy is leet
|
I never said it was, and in my opinion it is far from it, but I also understand people are different, and to restrict ones rights just because of a "difference" is, first and foremost, morally wrong, second of all, against the constitution. eek:
|
in many states it is illegal.
|
well, i guess thats something that needs to be changed in the near future.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
|

04-11-2005, 05:54 PM
I was just watching the Discovery channel and they had a stroy about how there is a scientist doing a study on monkeys in China and he has discovered that homosexuality in monkeys actually does have an evolutionary purpose. The story should be up on the daily planet website tomorrow, so when it is, i'll post it here so you guys can look at it.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
|

04-11-2005, 05:57 PM
Hell yeah! Gay monkeys!
/me sets his TiVo
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
|

04-11-2005, 06:02 PM
We can learn many things about how we behave as humans from how other animals behave.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Captain
Posts: 5,021
Join Date: Mar 2005
|

04-11-2005, 06:04 PM
edit
nevermind sleeping:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Captain
Posts: 5,824
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Robertplantsville
|

04-11-2005, 06:08 PM
Ban all marriages and make civil unions the norm.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
|

04-11-2005, 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KTOG
Ban all marriages and make civil unions the norm.
|
get a marriage through a church. Get a civil union through the "Wedding King" in Vegas.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 3,192
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City KS
|

04-11-2005, 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
|
Lets look at this one at a time.
Are you saying being gay is a religion, therefore prohibiting gay marriage some how denys the free exercise thereof?
How could banning gay marriage violate freedom of speech? There is certinly a lot of talk about the subject. In the news too.
Now the right of the people to peaceably assemble should not be considered because it isn't about assembling the people, unless you count the little ones created by the marriage.
And a bunch of people have petitioned the government for a redress of grievances.
**Practicing the dark art of turn signal usage since 1976.**
|
|
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
|