Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page New american budget: more money for defense
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
New american budget: more money for defense
Old
  (#1)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default New american budget: more money for defense - 02-06-2006, 08:32 PM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4686684.stm


I think you really need to consider another option other then putting more and more money on defense. Americans have not grabbled the idea of the military industrial complex, and its really unfortunate.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Stammer is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,021
Join Date: Mar 2005
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:33 PM

We need more tax cuts!

rolleyes:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stammer
We need more tax cuts!

rolleyes:
rock:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
TGB! is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,644
Join Date: Dec 2003
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:43 PM

[quote:3e0e9]Americans have not grabbled the idea of the military industrial complex, and its really unfortunate.[/quote:3e0e9]

Yes yes, TOO BAD Americans dont think like you Machette - if only they did theyd be SOOOO much better off. The mantra of the Moral-Thought-Police-Facist.

The defense budget has ALWAYS been a priority of EVERY administration - even when Clin-T0N reduced it, it STILL took precedence.

We thank you for your input into the financial affairs of the United States government, but millions of employed Americans, and lawful R&D companies kindly request you save the sanctimonious preening for local poli-sci meetups.

Thanks a bunch.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:49 PM

It indeed has been a priority for every adminstration. I remember reading that jimmy carter promised to cut it significantly but he raised it instead. I'm just saying Americans need to stop this military industrial complex from getting out of hand, which is what Eisenhower warned you guys in his farewell address. It's cutting important programs such as education, health etc. Are these not important programs or is building a bomb or a fighter jet?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Judas is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 8,792
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hans-AlbinVonReitzenstein
 Send a message via ICQ to Judas Send a message via AIM to Judas Send a message via MSN to Judas  
Default 02-06-2006, 08:52 PM

We thank you for your input into the financial affairs of the United States government, but millions of employed Americans, and lawful R&D companies kindly request you save the sanctimonious preening for local poli-sci meetups.


lol.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Coleman is Offline
Major General
 
Coleman's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:53 PM

we don't need some national health care. We just need to get rid of frivolous lawsuits in this country. Once those are chopped at, the prices of things go down significantly. Doctors wouldn't have to be worried about being sued up the ass for something petty--lowering rates for healthcare.

Bush did some great work on it when he was Gov of Texas and it worked pretty well.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:53 PM

[quote="TGB!":53be3][quote:53be3]

We thank you for your input into the financial affairs of the United States government, but millions of employed Americans, and lawful R&D companies kindly request you save the sanctimonious preening for local poli-sci meetups.
[/quote:53be3][/quote:53be3]

So let's all go to war!
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:54 PM

too bad we didn't listen to George Washington.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 02-06-2006, 08:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acideyez
too bad we didn't listen to George Washington.
That to...and I quote "Overgrown military establishments are under any form of government inauspicious to liberty, and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican liberty" Geroge Washington's Farewell address, september 17, 1796
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Coleman is Offline
Major General
 
Coleman's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
   
Default 02-06-2006, 09:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acideyez
too bad we didn't listen to George Washington.
That to...and I quote "Overgrown military establishments are under any form of government inauspicious to liberty, and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican liberty" Geroge Washington's Farewell address, september 17, 1796
i don't think you can use any of those quotes with any susbstatial meaning. It doesn't carry over into our times even though GW was one cool cat, heh


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
Chango is Offline
Sergeant
 
Posts: 1,113
Join Date: Oct 2002
 Send a message via ICQ to Chango  
Default 02-06-2006, 09:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acideyez
too bad we didn't listen to George Washington.
That to...and I quote "Overgrown military establishments are under any form of government inauspicious to liberty, and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican liberty" Geroge Washington's Farewell address, september 17, 1796
We didn't listen to a lot of things he said in his farewell address. Such as

"It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it, for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs that honesty is always the best policy."
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
TGB! is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,644
Join Date: Dec 2003
   
Default 02-06-2006, 09:37 PM

[quote:e6c32]I'm just saying Americans need to stop this military industrial complex from getting out of hand[/quote:e6c32]

Why? Dont just play lipservice with buzzwords and opinions you read on the back of Socialist Weekly - WHY.

[quote:e6c32]which is what Eisenhower warned you guys in his farewell address.[/quote:e6c32]

Oh please - there is NOTHING inherintly wrong with legitimate R&D facilities, and companies like LOCKHEED MARTIN pimping their wares to CONGRESS and the US Government. If you can however prove that the Boogey Man Iron-Triangle IS at its core BAD - then sure you have a point. Right now you dont, and in fact - as I said - you are arguing about MILLIONS losing their jobs, and stunting technological progress. But hey - war is bad.

Oh and, EISENHOWER didnt warn against letting the defense industry balloon to what it is today - he warned against it becoming the fourth arm of government. There IS a difference.

[quote:e6c32]cutting important programs such as education, health etc.[/quote:e6c32]

No its not.

[quote:e6c32]Are these not important programs or is building a bomb or a fighter jet?[/quote:e6c32]

Youre comparing apples in oranges in relation to the United States FEDERAL budget. One dollar turned over to the Defense Budget isnt one dollar taken away from Education, health, etc.

[quote:e6c32]So let's all go to war![/quote:e6c32]

Always there with an empty gesture, a meaningless retort - who loves ya baby.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
c312 is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,769
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia
  Send a message via AIM to c312  
Default 02-06-2006, 09:41 PM

gj TGB. I agree.

and Lockheed Martin owns, my dad works there.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 02-06-2006, 09:50 PM

Have all the jobs in defense is a priority now since most of your companies are moving offshore, however outsourcing would/could be a problem in the future for defense contractors, but since they are making so much money I don't see it being an issue..
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.