[quote="Pfc.Green":b64f7][quote="Sgt Stryker":b64f7]look what that $&#@$!@# did with SPR, they call the mark IV a "panzer tank" once and everyone including MOHAA and BF-1942 call it a "Panzer tank" $*&$@%@#*(&@$%@$(*!@%^#(*

armoured tank WTF #%&*!@$#&$@[/quote:b64f7]

You do know that Panzer means tank, right?[/quote:b64f7]

actually it means armored.

Panzerkampfwagen = armored fighting vehicle

[-KLugE-]

[quote="Capt. John Miller":efd2c]eek: spielberg ownz you....[/quote:efd2c]


Miller! Let me make you a sig

[Pfc.Green]

[quote="Sgt Stryker":d74e2][quote="Pfc.Green":d74e2][quote="Sgt Stryker":d74e2]look what that $&#@$!@# did with SPR, they call the mark IV a "panzer tank" once and everyone including MOHAA and BF-1942 call it a "Panzer tank" $*&$@%@#*(&@$%@$(*!@%^#(*

armoured tank WTF #%&*!@$#&$@[/quote:d74e2]

You do know that Panzer means tank, right?[/quote:d74e2]

actually it means armored.

Panzerkampfwagen = armored fighting vehicle[/quote:d74e2]


Actually I just looked it up and it means " Tank Battle Wagon"

[Tripper]

Did someone say Wank battle??

wang battle?

[Tripper]

No W*NK! NOW W*NK BOY! I'M WAY AHEADAYA!


(I have to censor for wook)

do you trolls (Germ especially) have nothing better to do than send threads down the crapper?

anyway back to Spielberg's "tank tank"

This is a lot like the Mig-28 in Top Gun, a person I know said he saw some lady buying an F-5 Tiger for her kid and she told him it was a Mig-28, despite the fact that it says F-5 on the box and the fact that in the movie "charlie" explains that the "migs" they are fighting are F-5s. hake:

civillians are stupid about what they see in the movies, so producers and directors have to be very careful to be accurate, look how far "tank tank" got to.

[Tripper]

BOY! Give Spielbegr some credit....It was a GREAT film....And if you can't watch it cause of ONE minor slip up, I suggest that YOU try and make the same film, NO mistakes...TOTALLY historically accurate.

But I do see where you are coming from with the whole, Other people messing up cause of what they saw in the film thing. I'm sure it happens to all.....For instance, if you watched a film on 'Under-Water-Basket-Weaving' and you go around quoting the movie, calling the flax they used in it, "2.5" inchs....When in fact the proffesionals use "2.1" Then enthusiats about the sport would get pissed off with you too. It happens to the best of us. Not everyone can be a WW2 Enthusiast....

Originally Posted by Tripper

BOY! Give Spielbegr some credit....It was a GREAT film....And if you can't watch it cause of ONE minor slip up, I suggest that YOU try and make the same film, NO mistakes...TOTALLY historically accurate.

But I do see where you are coming from with the whole, Other people messing up cause of what they saw in the film thing. I'm sure it happens to all.....For instance, if you watched a film on 'Under-Water-Basket-Weaving' and you go around quoting the movie, calling the flax they used in it, "2.5" inchs....When in fact the proffesionals use "2.1" Then enthusiats about the sport would get pissed off with you too. It happens to the best of us. Not everyone can be a WW2 Enthusiast....

Why would I watch under water basket weaving??? eek:

[Milla]

Kludge u no like my sig?!?! <----is hurt bad cry: [img]http://www.boomspeed.com/chris1stid/BoB12.jpg[/img]

[quote="Sgt Stryker":02759]do you trolls (Germ especially) have nothing better to do than send threads down the crapper?

anyway back to Spielberg's "tank tank"

This is a lot like the Mig-28 in Top Gun, a person I know said he saw some lady buying an F-5 Tiger for her kid and she told him it was a Mig-28, despite the fact that it says F-5 on the box and the fact that in the movie "charlie" explains that the "migs" they are fighting are F-5s. hake:

civillians are stupid about what they see in the movies, so producers and directors have to be very careful to be accurate, look how far "tank tank" got to.[/quote:02759]

time for me to send another thread down the crapper.

the mig-28 ur talking about it's called mig-29 hehe

[-KLugE-]

[quote="Capt. John Miller":41c02]Kludge u no like my sig?!?! <----is hurt bad cry: [img]http://www.boomspeed.com/chris1stid/BoB12.jpg[/img][/quote:41c02]

It's not bad...But I want to make you a sig!

[quote=Germ]

Originally Posted by "Sgt Stryker":451f8

do you trolls (Germ especially) have nothing better to do than send threads down the crapper?

anyway back to Spielberg's "tank tank"

This is a lot like the Mig-28 in Top Gun, a person I know said he saw some lady buying an F-5 Tiger for her kid and she told him it was a Mig-28, despite the fact that it says F-5 on the box and the fact that in the movie "charlie" explains that the "migs" they are fighting are F-5s. hake:

civillians are stupid about what they see in the movies, so producers and directors have to be very careful to be accurate, look how far "tank tank" got to.

time for me to send another thread down the crapper.

the mig-28 ur talking about it's called mig-29 hehe[/quote:451f8]

I know that, but in Top Gun they called it Mig-28, that's the whole point!

[Pyro]

no right to diss spielberg...like you could make a movie close to his calaber

you just suck!

[Tripper]

[quote:55c87]Why would I watch under water basket weaving??? [/quote:55c87]

It was an example, Smart-Arse....If I used an example of something you would watch, I would have talked about Gay-Man porn. But unfortunately for some, I don't watch that shit, and know nothing about it. hake: