| 
	
	
	
	 
   
		
            
             
				Faster than light travel possible? - 
            
          
		
		
				
		
				01-12-2005, 02:19 PM
			
			
			
		  
		
	
                
            	
		
		
		[quote:662e0]Astronomers predict faster- than- light travel based 
[From "The Sunday Times" (UK) 13th August 1995] 
 
ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL 
 
It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone before. 
Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical 
Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be able 
to travel faster than the speed of light. 
 
The breakthrough means that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar 
civilisations and voyages powered by warp drive are now no longer the 
exclusive domain of science fiction writers. 
 
The report was written by Ian Crawford, an astronomer at University 
College London, who believes not only that man will one day see stars at 
close quarters, but that we had better start preparing ourselves for the 
consequences, including contact with aliens. 
 
His paper, Some Thoughts On The Implications Of Faster-Than-Light Travel, 
has been validated by independent referees in the scientific community 
and will be published next month. Its publication coincides with the 
formation by British and American scientists of the Interstellar 
Propulsion Society (IPS) which is dedicated to finding a means of taking 
astronauts to the stars. 
 
Crawford argues that modern physics may allow two possible ways around 
Einstein's theory, which says that because bodies have infinite mass at 
the speed of light, no amount of energy can make them go faster. 
 
The first is to pass through "wormholes", rifts in the fabric of space 
caused by intense gravitational fields such as those found around the 
collapsed stars known as black holes. 
 
Crawford says that such fields may allow the traveller to enter a 
wormhole from one point and then to leave it at another, possibly 
thousands of light years away. 
 
Previously, scientists have assumed that any astronaut who was caught in 
such a powerful gravitational field would be pulled into something 
resembling a piece of spaghetti. 
 
However, Crawford said last week that recent research had suggested 
wormholes could be stabilised and manipulated to create short cuts 
between any two points in space. "The proofs are complex and 
mathematical, but more and more astrophysicists are satisfied that in 
theory it is possible," he said. 
 
Should wormholes fail, however, Crawford proposes a second possible route 
to the stars. He draws on a recent paper by Miguel Alcubierre, of the 
University of Wales, in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity to 
suggest the possibility of propulsion systems which distort space by 
compressing it in front of a spaceship while expanding it behind. 
 
Such a system would effectively bend space, creating a form of "warp 
drive" reminiscent of the Starship Enterprise of Captain James T Kirk in 
Star Trek. 
 
The theories will boost growing interest among scientists in the 
possibility of travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members 
include several NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in 
Halifax, Nova Scotia. 
 
Patrick Moore, the astronomer and presenter of The Sky At Night, said he 
believed interstellar travel would one day be achieved. "Television would 
have seemed impossible 200 years ago and faster than light travel is no 
more outrageous than that," he said. 
 
Arthur C Clarke, the science fiction writer and futurologist, was equally 
enthusiastic. His first novel, Against The Fall Of Night, published in 
1932, presumed that man would be able to travel faster than light. 
 
Speaking from his home in Colombo, Sri Lanka, he said: "That was just a 
dramatic device which all science fiction writers have to use in space 
travel, but I have always believed it may one day be possible." 
 
Sir Martin Rees, the astronomer royal and professor of astronomy at 
Cambridge University, was more cautious, however, saying the proofs were 
purely theoretical.[/quote:662e0] 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |