Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page The Rape of Nanking: the forgotten holocaust of world war II
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#31)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 05-31-2005, 02:38 PM

one thing you cant argue, after the bombs were dropped no one messed with the US............................................... until 9/11
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#32)
Trunks is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
  Send a message via AIM to Trunks Send a message via MSN to Trunks Send a message via Yahoo to Trunks  
Default 05-31-2005, 04:15 PM

true slackem but is that a good thing or a bad thing? The US can be looked at as the class bully. The bully beats up some kids, and establishes himself as the class bully. People tolerate him for a while, but then one kid has enough and stands up to him. He gets beat up. Then more and more peopel stand up to him, and soon teh bully is the one getting beat up. Nobody likes a bully, and unfortunately, in some cases, that seems like what the US is becoming. A bully, with nukes.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#33)
Jimbo@ is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2004
   
Default 05-31-2005, 11:37 PM

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":1e53c]one thing you cant argue, after the bombs were dropped no one messed with the US............................................... until 9/11[/quote:1e53c]

yes because nuclear waeapons can't be used on terrorists.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#34)
Tripper is Offline
General of the Army
 
Posts: 18,895
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
   
Default 05-31-2005, 11:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
true slackem but is that a good thing or a bad thing? The US can be looked at as the class bully. The bully beats up some kids, and establishes himself as the class bully. People tolerate him for a while, but then one kid has enough and stands up to him. He gets beat up. Then more and more peopel stand up to him, and soon teh bully is the one getting beat up. Nobody likes a bully, and unfortunately, in some cases, that seems like what the US is becoming. A bully, with nukes.
Alot of other countries have nukes as well. It's not like the U.S is the only one. I don't consider the U.S a bully....More of a policeman with good intentions that's made a mistake or too along the way...
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#35)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 06-01-2005, 07:10 AM

as far as the placement of the bombs, its not like today where we can pin point the strike area. We used the latest technolgy availble at that time
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#36)
Madmartagen is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,558
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
   
Default 06-01-2005, 09:47 PM

Japanese had it coming, thats my personal opinion, but i know that wasnt the reason why we dropped the bombs. there is no way to bluff a enemy totally commited to war into surrendering. the only way to wake these fuckers up and let them know the war was over was to drop some heavy firepower onto them. its sad that it took that kind of devastation to end the war, but the US, Britain, Commonwealth, USSR and China didnt go into the 20th century looking to fight this war. victory was ours because of that we decide how the war will end. this was a total war, and the only acceptable way for us to end it was to have the unconditional surrender of the Japanese Empire. there was no way to get that w/o getting nasty.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#37)
Jimbo@ is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2004
   
Default 06-02-2005, 04:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripper
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
true slackem but is that a good thing or a bad thing? The US can be looked at as the class bully. The bully beats up some kids, and establishes himself as the class bully. People tolerate him for a while, but then one kid has enough and stands up to him. He gets beat up. Then more and more peopel stand up to him, and soon teh bully is the one getting beat up. Nobody likes a bully, and unfortunately, in some cases, that seems like what the US is becoming. A bully, with nukes.
Alot of other countries have nukes as well. It's not like the U.S is the only one. I don't consider the U.S a bully....More of a policeman with good intentions that's made a mistake or too along the way...

Or the policeman who confiscates your pot and smokes it himself.
Damn Hypocrite annoy:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#38)
rdeyes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,459
Join Date: May 2003
Location: anchorage,ak
 Send a message via ICQ to rdeyes Send a message via Yahoo to rdeyes  
Default 06-02-2005, 05:23 AM

Pearl Harbor annoy:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#39)
Trunks is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,410
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
  Send a message via AIM to Trunks Send a message via MSN to Trunks Send a message via Yahoo to Trunks  
Default 06-02-2005, 01:11 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyes
Pearl Harbor annoy:
Pearl harbor was primarily an attack on the military forces stationed there. And it was a surprise attack. Can you really blame them? They knew that sooner or later, their would liekly be a war between the US and Japan, and they decided to launch a surprise attack, and start the war on their terms. I hope I am not offending anyone, but that is the truth.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#40)
Madmartagen is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,558
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
   
Default 06-02-2005, 05:41 PM

i agree, pearl harbor was a legitimate military target.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#41)
rdeyes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,459
Join Date: May 2003
Location: anchorage,ak
 Send a message via ICQ to rdeyes Send a message via Yahoo to rdeyes  
Default 06-02-2005, 08:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyes
Pearl Harbor annoy:
Pearl harbor was primarily an attack on the military forces stationed there. And it was a surprise attack. Can you really blame them? They knew that sooner or later, their would liekly be a war between the US and Japan, and they decided to launch a surprise attack, and start the war on their terms. I hope I am not offending anyone, but that is the truth.
how can say there was no way to avoid a war with the US, the US wasnt interested in going to war with japan or germany, it wasnt until pearl harbor that the US really got invovled in the war . they deserved what they got , if you look at the major ground battles in the pacific, the US command knew the japs wouldnt just give up , so they had no other option but to drop the bombs.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#42)
Madmartagen is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,558
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
   
Default 06-02-2005, 09:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyes
Pearl Harbor annoy:
Pearl harbor was primarily an attack on the military forces stationed there. And it was a surprise attack. Can you really blame them? They knew that sooner or later, their would liekly be a war between the US and Japan, and they decided to launch a surprise attack, and start the war on their terms. I hope I am not offending anyone, but that is the truth.
how can say there was no way to avoid a war with the US, the US wasnt interested in going to war with japan or germany, it wasnt until pearl harbor that the US really got invovled in the war . they deserved what they got , if you look at the major ground battles in the pacific, the US command knew the japs wouldnt just give up , so they had no other option but to drop the bombs.
in japans point of view, war with america was unavoidable. in order for them to continue their conquest of east asia, they needed to trade with the US. america had already let japan know that if it continued its push into asian countries, we would stop trading with them. japan was not about to stop its conquest, and so they had come to the conclusion that they would have to fight the US sooner or later. so, as trunks put it, they attacked first and had the element of surprise.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#43)
rdeyes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,459
Join Date: May 2003
Location: anchorage,ak
 Send a message via ICQ to rdeyes Send a message via Yahoo to rdeyes  
Default 06-02-2005, 09:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madmartagen
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyes
Pearl Harbor annoy:
Pearl harbor was primarily an attack on the military forces stationed there. And it was a surprise attack. Can you really blame them? They knew that sooner or later, their would liekly be a war between the US and Japan, and they decided to launch a surprise attack, and start the war on their terms. I hope I am not offending anyone, but that is the truth.
how can say there was no way to avoid a war with the US, the US wasnt interested in going to war with japan or germany, it wasnt until pearl harbor that the US really got invovled in the war . they deserved what they got , if you look at the major ground battles in the pacific, the US command knew the japs wouldnt just give up , so they had no other option but to drop the bombs.
in japans point of view, war with america was unavoidable. in order for them to continue their conquest of east asia, they needed to trade with the US. america had already let japan know that if it continued its push into asian countries, we would stop trading with them. japan was not about to stop its conquest, and so they had come to the conclusion that they would have to fight the US sooner or later. so, as trunks put it, they attacked first and had the element of surprise.
do you think that attack played any part in the US dropping atomic bobms on them ? i think it had a little bit of effect
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#44)
Madmartagen is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,558
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
   
Default 06-02-2005, 09:26 PM

im sure there was revenge in the minds of the sailors, marines and pilots, but the whole tactical and strategic purpose for using the bomb was to end the war.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#45)
rdeyes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,459
Join Date: May 2003
Location: anchorage,ak
 Send a message via ICQ to rdeyes Send a message via Yahoo to rdeyes  
Default 06-03-2005, 03:22 AM

yeah its a shame that it had to end like that , war isnt a friendly game
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.