[Polaris]

1-Adolf Hitler
2-Hermann Goering
3-Joseph Goebbels
4-Heinrich Himmler
5-Wilhelm Keitel
6-Franklin Delano Roosevelt
7-Harry S. Truman
8-Winston Churchill
9-Neville Chamberlain
10-Joseph Stalin
11-Benito Mussolini
12-General Hideki Tojo

get to work 2015

[Recycled Spooge]

LOL, it would be like a bad comedy movie.

------------------

[blade]

They have some of those characters on MOH:Playstaion-Mulitplayer. Its ok, but I'd prefer some new models, maybe some hard core grunts and german soldiers.

------------------

[blade]

I also apologize for the insult, Spooge... highly uncalled for..

------------------

[blade]

ohhhh yeah... what about Roosevelt? Is he going to be in his wheel chair with a chain gun? LOL.. that would be cool. J/K hehe

------------------

[Recycled Spooge]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by blade:
I also apologize for the insult, Spooge... highly uncalled for..

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Huh? What are you talking about?


------------------

[blade]

Sorry, but I got mad at you in the other thread about the screenshot.

------------------

[Recycled Spooge]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by blade:
Sorry, but I got mad at you in the other thread about the screenshot.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Ah, that's ok I'm used to that!



------------------

[Polaris]

i dont know if i want that much of individual characteristics for multiplayer . i'd rather have sniper , reconn , assault , etc ...as characteristics . the more simple , the more balanced the multiplayer will be without advantages or disadvantages . too many individual characteristics is too deathmatchy for my tastes .

[riesep]

Half of the players in multiplayer I didn't even know on the playstation games. What I think would be cool, is if the characters had slight differences in how skill levels. For instance some characters might be a little faster, some are taller( a different look), some can reload faster, a smaller player may not be as good with a gun but they would have less area to get shot, stuff like that makes a game rise above the rest. What do you think 2015.

[riesep]

There should be at least 50 different character models. It shouldn't take too long to do that, at least I don't think, but what do I know.

[BallisticWookie]

Blade, the sniper rifle for Allies in DoD is a Springfield .03
A good class system should be one where if theres a specific objective that needs to be met in the level/map or anything team oriented each player is dependent on the other. Say if theres a sniper, he wouldnt survive long without someone to back him up, like in real life a sniper mostly always has a spotter who has the close combat weaponry to protect them, the sniper takes the long rage shots and the spotter protects their perimeter. EVERYBODY needs to stick together, no running off rambo style. It should strictly be squad based combat, a group against a group, not 1 man against 1 man or whatever. There should be penalties for leaving your squad and going off by yourself.
And I would hope this is what the game is going to be like in multiplayer, maybe even have a commander view who can direct the troops like what their doing in Team Fortress 2 ???

[BallisticWookie]

Sorry for getting carried away, but yes there should be a hefty variety of player skins/models to choose from, Rangers, Army, Marines, 101st Airborne/Paratroopers so on so forth and yes as Polaris pointed out historical people, which would be very funny
Polaris, you forgot Rommel

[blade]

I think 50 models is way too much.. maybe 5 for each side. For DoD there was stuff like that. Here were the classes:

For the Allies:
Light Infantry- Garand,.45,2 nades, and was very fast

Medium Infantry-Thompson SMG, .45, 1 nade, was medium speed.

Heavy Infantry-BAR, .45, 1 nade, slow but very powerfull

Sniper-uhh forgot what the rifle was, .45, no nades, medium speed.

------------------

[Recycled Spooge]

Maybe we can make our own models...

------------------