[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":71c3e]Whats with you being a stupid fuck jumpin' in on other peoples arguements?? eek:

Ninty9 stereotypes Americans ALL THE TIME so I'll do my part and stereotype Canadians.

EH!?[/quote:71c3e]

Well.. You stereotype Canadians, and I'm a Canadian. so thus, it's my buisness.

[Eames]

[quote=Quze]

Originally Posted by "Cpt. Zapotoski":c72ed

It's simple Ninty9... there is no way our military is going to fight the war on terror in 5 different countries. It's not possible right now with the size of our military like Eames said.

Can you comprehend that, EH?

What is with you and all the fucking sterotypes? Hell, I guess Eames is inbred and his wife is his cousin, caz ya'll know hes from the South, and that's what happens down there! YEE HAW![/quote:c72ed]

this is offtopic, but if your going to use stereotypes use a correct one...the imbred southerners are backwater hillbilles...I live in Tampa....a city...remember we won the superbowl last year?

[Zap. USMC]

[quote:59aee]The United states goverment has an obligation to its people now to supress all threats now before they can materialize, this is why we pre-emptivly attacked iraq, and its why we will most likley pre-empmtivly attack other countries in the future, we simply cant afford to sit back and wait for another 9-11 style attack to happen again, before we do take action.[/quote:59aee]

Eames just hit the nail on the head, right Ninty9 !?

Eames proved a vaild point on why the US invaded Iraq without "proper justification" according to the forum genius Ninity9...

We're not going to wait around and have terroists destroy 3-4 cities before we get our thumbs out of our asses and do something.

[ninty]

I don't recall sterotyping Americans.

Anyway this isn't an argument, this is you ganging up on me because I have a different opinion. It seems your the one whose very defensive when someone voices something that doesn't support your views.

And I dind't even ask a question, so I have no idea what your answering.

I recall Sgt Stryker saying why not go after other terrorists on other countries, and I remember agreeing with him, but not asking a question.

I also recall recall your many attempts at insulting me, but how could it affect me since I need an education?

[quote="Cpl. Eames":2ab7a][quote=Quze]

Originally Posted by "Cpt. Zapotoski":2ab7a

It's simple Ninty9... there is no way our military is going to fight the war on terror in 5 different countries. It's not possible right now with the size of our military like Eames said.

Can you comprehend that, EH?

What is with you and all the fucking sterotypes? Hell, I guess Eames is inbred and his wife is his cousin, caz ya'll know hes from the South, and that's what happens down there! YEE HAW![/quote:2ab7a]

this is offtopic, but if your going to use stereotypes use a correct one...the imbred southerners are backwater hillbilles...I live in Tampa....a city...remember we won the superbowl last year?[/quote:2ab7a]

See that's the thing, it doesn't matter if it's correct or not. Tampa is in the south is it not? And the stereotype is that anyone from the South is an inbred redneck.

Just like, Anyone that lives in Canada says "Eh?" and lives in an Igloo.

(Note: Incase anyone is a complete moron, I do not believe in the stereotype that all Southreners are rednecks, as we do have "hicks" in Canada aswell. I'm trying to prove a point to Cpt.Zap, that stereotypes are incorrect and make for lousy insults.)

[Eight Ace]

Originally Posted by ninty9

Anyway, you people are hopeless and i'm not going to change any minds, and your not going to change mine. I feel sorry for you though, being mislead.

"you people"?...."hopeless"?, why are the words condescending and twat coming to mind?

That one guy should be wiser than not only all of "us people", but the American, English and Australian governments too....it seems unfair eek:

[Zap. USMC]

Originally Posted by ninty9

I don't recall sterotyping Americans.
It seems your the one whose very defensive when someone voices something that doesn't support your views.

Hah, this is coming from a person who goes on a rampage when someone doesn't agree with you. Let's go and find all the shit you say to people when they don't agree with you, or simply prove you wrong.

And you obviously need an education if you think there are only two terroists organizations in the world.

[Madmartagen]

Earmes, dont turn this into a fucking liberal vs. conservative issue again. You always do that shit and its really fucking annoying. All you do is blame democrats, liberals, and people who don't think the same way Bush tells them too. It isnt liberals and hippies who divide this country, its ignorant jerkoffs like you who point the finger at everyone who doesnt want to play ball with Bush. It is so ridiculous to blame everything on the previous administration, ok? No one blamed Bush Sr. when the WTC was attacked the first time, and Clinton got the heat for it even though he was in office for only 48 days. Bush Jr. used Clintons military to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan. How do I know that? Because Bush spent his first year taking a nap and going on vacation. He also didnt create a military budget until October of 2002, a whole year after the Afghanistan campaign. Ergo, if the military was underfunded or suffered from budget cuts, it would not have been able to perform so brilliantly in Afghanistan. I'm a liberal, I'm glad Saddam is in jail, and I give Bush credit for sending our men in to get the job done whether there are WMD's or not. So for God's sake just enjoy the moment that is today, before everyone goes back to their party-biased bullshit.

[ninty]

[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":1545e][quote:1545e]The United states goverment has an obligation to its people now to supress all threats now before they can materialize, this is why we pre-emptivly attacked iraq, and its why we will most likley pre-empmtivly attack other countries in the future, we simply cant afford to sit back and wait for another 9-11 style attack to happen again, before we do take action.[/quote:1545e]

Eames just hit the nail on the head, right Ninty9 !?

Eames proved a vaild point on why the US invaded Iraq without "proper justification" according to the forum genius Ninity9...

We're not going to wait around and have terroists destroy 3-4 cities before we get our thumbs out of our asses and do something.[/quote:1545e]

No, I don't believe so.

Listen, I believe it is wrong to attack someone/country/organization without having them attack you first, or having credible evidence that an attack is coming. I still have not seen any credible evidence that Saddam Hussein was going to attack the US.

[Eames]

Originally Posted by ninty9

I don't recall sterotyping Americans.

Anyway this isn't an argument, this is you ganging up on me because I have a different opinion. It seems your the one whose very defensive when someone voices something that doesn't support your views.

And I dind't even ask a question, so I have no idea what your answering.

I recall Sgt Stryker saying why not go after other terrorists on other countries, and I remember agreeing with him, but not asking a question.

I also recall recall your many attempts at insulting me, but how could it affect me since I need an education?

Why don't you read what I've posted, because I've answerd every question thats been asked or responded to all of the anti-american rhetoric that has been posted with accurate answers.

[gtboys34]

Bush Wins 2004 election

[ninty]

[quote="Eight Ace":6e285]

Originally Posted by ninty9

Anyway, you people are hopeless and i'm not going to change any minds, and your not going to change mine. I feel sorry for you though, being mislead.

"you people"?...."hopeless"?, why are the words condescending and twat coming to mind?

That one guy should be wiser than not only all of "us people", but the American, English and Australian governments too....it seems unfair eek:[/quote:6e285]

I don't know. Why don't you explain it to me?

[quote:6e285]Why don't you read what I've posted, because I've answerd every question thats been asked or responded to all of the anti-american rhetoric that has been posted with accurate answers. [/quote:6e285]

No.

[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":58518][quote:58518]The United states goverment has an obligation to its people now to supress all threats now before they can materialize, this is why we pre-emptivly attacked iraq, and its why we will most likley pre-empmtivly attack other countries in the future, we simply cant afford to sit back and wait for another 9-11 style attack to happen again, before we do take action.[/quote:58518]

Eames just hit the nail on the head, right Ninty9 !?

Eames proved a vaild point on why the US invaded Iraq without "proper justification" according to the forum genius Ninity9...

We're not going to wait around and have terroists destroy 3-4 cities before we get our thumbs out of our asses and do something.[/quote:58518]

destroy 3-4 cities with what?
If you didn't notice, the WMD story is just that, a story.
Most everyone is using the humanitarian issue to back up our reasons for going to war, I'm with them on the humanitarian standpoint, but I hate people who are stupid enough to continue believing that Iraq was close to building a nuke. Their program was in shambles and Saddam would have probebly killed his scientists if we didn't invade in a year or so.

[Eames]

Originally Posted by Madmartagen

Earmes, dont turn this into a fucking liberal vs. conservative issue again. You always do that shit and its really fucking annoying. All you do is blame democrats, liberals, and people who don't think the same way Bush tells them too. It isnt liberals and hippies who divide this country, its ignorant jerkoffs like you who point the finger at everyone who doesnt want to play ball with Bush. It is so ridiculous to blame everything on the previous administration, ok? No one blamed Bush Sr. when the WTC was attacked the first time, and Clinton got the heat for it even though he was in office for only 48 days. Bush Jr. used Clintons military to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan. How do I know that? Because Bush spent his first year taking a nap and going on vacation. He also didnt create a military budget until October of 2002, a whole year after the Afghanistan campaign. Ergo, if the military was underfunded or suffered from budget cuts, it would not have been able to perform so brilliantly in Afghanistan. I'm a liberal, I'm glad Saddam is in jail, and I give Bush credit for sending our men in to get the job done whether there are WMD's or not. So for God's sake just enjoy the moment that is today, before everyone goes back to their party-biased bullshit.

How am I turning it into a liberal vs conservative argument? All I did was answer questions...and obviously you seem to have problems with people that disagree with you by calling me "ingnorant" even though I dont personally attack anyone on these forums (because i think only pussies insult other people over the internet because they don't have to back up their statements they can just throw them out there and not have to worry about getting their asses kicked for making them) But clearly everyone who disagrees with what i have to say, but can't come up with a legitamate argument with me instead has to resort to personal attacks on me like calling me "ignorant" or a "racist" because they don't have anything else to argue. As for you comments on the militares budget,/size/effectivness...its a well known fact that clinton initiated one of the largest military cutbacks in american history, its also a well known fact that clinton did not like the military, he distrusted it and thought of it as uncessary, this why almost all military actions that happend during the clinton era were fiascos like somalia and his response to our embasy bombings, but still don't get the wrong impression...he could have cut the military budget and the size of our military in half and we still are able to roll through any one country on earth with no problem like you pointed out, in afganistan...but fighting mutliple wars on multiple fronts...thats a diferent story...our military curently isnt capable of doing that...why? clinton era cutbacks its a fact, its not party bias. Now to address your statement about the first WTC bombing, george bush senior didn't have any intel on that attack happening at all, and as i recall no one blamed bush sr or clinton for that attack...it was just a horrible act of terrorism....an no one would be blaming clinton for 9-11 if it wasn't a known fact that clinton could have captured or killed bin ladin on a few occasions and decided not to, even though he bombed 2 us embassies and blew a hole in one of ships, clinton did nothing but launch a few cruise missles and call it a day....and again thats not party bias its facts, strait and simple, you just dont like to hear the truth...and automaticly asume im just spewing party rhetoric. As for your final statements, I think its great that you support bush and the war on terror, my prior posts weren't aimed at you, they were aimed at the foreigners and their anti-american rhetoric and the gloom and doom liberals state side.

[Maplegyver]

[img]http://reichnation.com/uploads/hijack.jpg[/img]