OK, I'm going to watch this when I get home. I usually love things like this. I want to make one comment BEFORE I watch it; that is if 99 won't kill me before I get to do so.
It seems like controversial videos like I am expecting this to be have a certain effect on people. They may present facts and potential outcomes, but they lead those who watch them to draw very specific conclusions. What exactly do I mean? The filthy Irishman commented on how the buildings falling looked similar to implosion footage provided in the video. Yes this may seem odd, but wouldn't the only people qualified to comment and evaluate that be the structural engineers who designed the WTC? In my opinion, the fact that other buildings have fallen in a similar fashion would only lend credit to the fact that the WTC disaster was a very real and terrible thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
because this video really doesn't say what happened, it just raises a bunch of points we were all too stupid to realize because we're always distracted by what the media tells us, what we hear from our peers and other news outlets.
|
This again points to what I'm talking about. Just because this video points out something the national media left out doesn't mean that these guys aren't using the same type of smoke and mirrors.
I guess my entire point is this: Its very easy to present information in such a way that it will sway someones opion and perception. We need to keep that in mind when watching anything; from MSNBC to Michael Moore.
I changed my mind, my REAL point is: stfu judas you ignorant tree-hugging dolphin-fucking hippy. cool: