Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page The Impeachment Question
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#16)
TGB! is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,644
Join Date: Dec 2003
   
Default 07-08-2005, 08:36 AM

[quote:ddaf4]If Clinton can get impeached for lying about something legal[/quote:ddaf4]

He didnt get impeached for lying about something legal - he got impeached because he lied in regards to a federal investigation. He could have lied about what type of pen he used - if it was in response to a criminal investigation then its a felony. That it was about oral only gives folks on the left a reason to say "oh he was impeached for having sex in the White House" - which is so ridiculously far from the truth - and really only the TIP of the iceberg regarding the mans activities (using the White House for political gain, allowing Chinese spies on the US payroll, firing government employees for your wifes friends, obstruction of justice. . .etc. etc. etc.)

[quote:ddaf4]Last time i check this is purgery[/quote:ddaf4]

It's only perjury - and I dont know that it would even be that - if it can be shown that is was "willful". If all that can be shown is that the President went to war with dodgy evidence, then nothings going to touch him.

[quote:ddaf4]Remember hindsight is 20/20[/quote:ddaf4]

Absolutely. Nevermind the facts that have come out regarding the OFF scandal - Saddam was NOT playing by the rules. Period. I know everyone keeps on saying "Diplomacy First!" - remember, this GOVERNMENT (no diplomacy doesnt reset when a new President gets into office) tried that. . .and failed. Numerous times.

[quote:ddaf4]So did Hitler but we never attacked him until Pearl Harbor.[/quote:ddaf4]

Who would have been around, or willing, to punish Germany for violating the Treat of Versailles? There was no UN, and the United States was VERY unwilling to get dragged into another war. This promise or a refusal to go to war was part of FDR's campaign stumps.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
Pyro is Offline
Chief of Staff General
 
Pyro's Avatar
 
Posts: 20,691
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brampton Ontario Canada
  Send a message via AIM to Pyro Send a message via MSN to Pyro  
Default 07-08-2005, 02:17 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTOG
So did Hitler but we never attacked him until Pearl Harbor.
The argument that I always use when explaining this.

There was no benefit to fighting Hitler until they were dragged into it...the countless lives lost in Iraq was for a gain to America moreso than Saddam getting ejected cuz come on saddam is no hitler.


  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.