Feds after Google data - Page 2

Stammer · 01-22-2006, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312

nah, only people who have done something wrong care about this

lol, Worst defense ever. "I've done nothing wrong so I have nothing to worry about." Please, government is run by other human beings and human beings are easily corrupted by money and power. Just becuase you've done nothing wrong doesn't mean they still wont come after you.

elstatec · 01-22-2006, 09:25 PM

HE SEARCHED FOR WATER BOMBS ON GOOGLE, HE MUST BE PRETENDING TO LOOK FOR WATER BOMBS, WHEN ACTUALLY HE IS LOOKING TO MAKE NITROGLYCERIN BOMBS, GET THE BASTARD

[img]http://jesusburger.net/upload/STOPFBI3.jpg[/img]
[img]http://jesusburger.net/upload/STOPFBI1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://jesusburger.net/upload/STOPFBI2.jpg[/img]

Pyro · 01-23-2006, 12:29 PM

Google...good work!

Tripper · 01-23-2006, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elstatec

HE SEARCHED FOR WATER BOMBS ON GOOGLE, HE MUST BE PRETENDING TO LOOK FOR WATER BOMBS, WHEN ACTUALLY HE IS LOOKING TO MAKE NITROGLYCERIN BOMBS, GET THE BASTARD

[img]http://jesusburger.net/upload/STOPFBI3.jpg[/img]
[img]http://jesusburger.net/upload/STOPFBI1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://jesusburger.net/upload/STOPFBI2.jpg[/img]

lmfao

1080jibber · 01-23-2006, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stammer

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312

nah, only people who have done something wrong care about this

lol, Worst defense ever. "I've done nothing wrong so I have nothing to worry about." Please, government is run by other human beings and human beings are easily corrupted by money and power. Just becuase you've done nothing wrong doesn't mean they still wont come after you.

I bet he would be singing a different tune if it was the Democratic Party.

I dont care if im monitered on the streets, I wish that could happen. Put as many cameras and what not out on the streets, but as soon as they moniter you in your own home, thats a big no no.

c312 · 01-23-2006, 02:11 PM

I would be angry if they missed terrorists plots because they weren't monitoring . If it were Dems, I wouldn't have a different opinion, honestly, it doesn't bother me because I know I haven't done anything wrong.

PS. There is no constitutional right to privacy.

elstatec · 01-23-2006, 04:16 PM

ignorant view to it as usual.

c312 · 01-23-2006, 04:32 PM

It's not ignorant. I understand what is going on and made a judgement based on those understandings.

Honestly, how does this negatively affect the average citizen?

Madmartagen · 01-23-2006, 05:34 PM

i think privacy is a fundamental right and should be constitutionaly protected. i think the topic is the next civil rights-like issue of our day. i dont like being monitored and i dont want someone potentially bringing up the fact that i downloaded 2 TB of pr0n last week 30 years from now when i am married, have kids and a decent living.

elstatec · 01-23-2006, 06:44 PM

does the patriot act touch internet usage at all?

ninty · 01-26-2006, 06:33 PM

The thing is, google shouldn't have the information in the first place. They should not collect data like this.

Google knows your IP, the search you made, at what date you made it, and where you went after. This is itelf an invasion of privacy.

PS, the government says the want the data to keep porn out of children, they say this has nothing to do with terrorist activities.

This type of thing should be left up to parents to monitor their children, not the government.

By the way, welcome to 1984. The police surveillance state is already here. Have fun kids.

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

c312 · 01-26-2006, 06:35 PM

so don't use google.

ninty · 01-26-2006, 06:42 PM

That's not the point. oOo:

MSN and Yahoo have already given the information, but this goes far beyond internet searches.

What about if there was a camera on every street corner in every city, like London? What if the government were to issue you a national ID card that you had to present to any police officer and they could ask you at any time for it without probable cause.

Not sure about the states, but I do know that police can not ask you to identify yourself without having a reason to do so in Canada. It IS in our constitution.

The republican party was always based upon less government intervention, but now the US probably has the largest amount of government involvement in people's daily lives in the history of the country.

When governments ask you to give up liberties for security, all you get is tyrrany, not security. More control in the hands of fewer people.

Thanks but no thanks, I like democracy just fine.

Stammer · 01-26-2006, 06:44 PM

"Those who sacrifice liberty in the name of security deserve neither liberty nor security." - Benjamin Franklin

Edit: Ninty, if the US was run by REAL Republicans we wouldn't even be talking about half this shit. Real Republicans don't exists. They lower taxes during war time and call themselves Republicans, that's about it. The only liberty they care about is you're right to carry a gun around.

c312 · 01-26-2006, 08:44 PM

I don't see how this is restricting my liberty at all. And the modern Republican Party only has things that you consider liberty restricting because they want to focus on another plank of their platform, which is national security.