[Milla]

Originally Posted by Tystnad

Dude, I went for the G17 instead, with all metal slide and outer barrel to go with it.

[img]http://www.smartstep.se/shopimages/111457.jpg[/img]

Final weight comes in at around a kilo. the_finger:

i have a USP compact, im about to get a shooters design slide for it those slides make the weapon heavier and SO much more reaslistic looking.

[[DAS REICH] Blitz]

if your looking for realism just buy a real gun. stupid:

[Milla]

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":90702]if your looking for realism just buy a real gun. stupid:[/quote:90702]

yes but you cannot kill someone with an airsoft pistol, hence i can shoot my friends and play MILSIM games rolleyes:

I do plan on getting a real USP compact or a HK P2000 (the updated USP compact) when i turn 21. .40 S&W of course.

[Zap. USMC]

Milla, why trade TM for Classic Army? I've heard that TM was better then Classic Army.. am I right?

[HeadUp]

[quote="Zap. USMC":f9ba0]Milla, why trade TM for Classic Army? I've heard that TM was better then Classic Army.. am I right?[/quote:f9ba0]

it depends, although my m4 is an SRC, it uses almost all TM parts...CA is more expensive and takes a lot more committment to keep in order

[jujumantb]

[quote="Zap. USMC":4de29]Milla, why trade TM for Classic Army? I've heard that TM was better then Classic Army.. am I right?[/quote:4de29]
TM is much more reliable. A dealer I know in minnesota wont even offer a warranty on CA guns because they fail so often. I don't have experience with CA, but this is from a guy who has been using and dealing these since the sport got big in japan. I dont know much about them performance-wise, but I dont see how they could be any better than what you can modify a TM to be. Also, for realism, you can get all metal parts for TM if you like. I really dont see any reason to get CA over TM, but Milla surely has one stupid:

[HeadUp]

Originally Posted by jujumantb

I really dont see any reason to get CA over TM, but Milla surely has one stupid:

yeah i agree TM is better

nice move milla wallbash:

[Milla]

Originally Posted by HeadUp

yeah i agree TM is better

nice move milla wallbash:

Negative, the new 2005 Ca's surpass the TMs in every aspect. So gg for all of you spank:

Yes prior to the new 2005 models don't EVER buy a CA, they were horrible horrible pieces of shit. But these new models have had nothing but good reviews, shoots 300-350fps out of the box, with steel gears installed and a metal body with Armalite trademarks.


http://www.airsoftgi.com/careview/index.htm

read that small review, this is just one site out of a shit load of sites that rave about it, plus people i have talked to said they are excellent now.

Also

[quote:89e99]Can you imagine grabbing the TM M4A1 at the front barrel and swing it around? We don't think so[/quote:89e99]

Barrel wobble doesnt exist, and its sturdy as a rock

http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/?filnavn ... review.htm

Another review

http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/reviews/ ... g_1728.jpg

[jujumantb]

cool, I've been totally out of the sport for a couple years now so this is news to me