[Milla]

Probably not, they wouldnt risk killing americans with them, unlike saddam who's soldiers rape and pillage everything

[Old Reliable]

of course saddam will use chemical weapons, why wouldn't he? he's going to die anyways

[Vance]

[quote="Low spark":73d4c]

Originally Posted by Vance1

So if Saddam uses chemical/bio weapons on our soldiers would your POV change?

I can only answer this with a couple of questions.
Did or did not Mr. Bush say that using tactical nukes was a reasonable?
If the United States was being Invaded by an overwhelming force would you expect our govenrment to use WMDs against the aggressor?[/quote:73d4c]
1. Yes, but only if they used them against us.
2. No.

[Low spark]

If he has any he may, but on the other hand he may not thinking that he would be made into a martyr(very unlikely) If we did not invade, would he use them, No, would he sell them to his enemies in Al Queda, No. I do believe that the Bush Administration is hope that he has WMDs. and does use them. If he doesn't have any left, I hope Bush remembers to take the made in the USA label off the WMDs he does find.

Millla, Then why does the US have WMDs if it has no intention of using them? A deterant?

[Tripper]

[quote="Capt. John Miller":39315][quote=Tripper]

Originally Posted by "Airborne Butters":39315

By not supporting us in our war against Saddam and his rain of tyranny. And for helping Iraq build his nuclear program.

But does the U.S really need support? I mean, the French are doing more than other nations.

They did fuck up when they helped Sadaam, but the French always fuck up when it comes to nuclear weapons.....

But every nation fucks up....The U.S fucked over the Iraqi people at the end of the last Gulf War.[/quote:39315]

We are gonna fix what we fucked over back in 1991, this is one reason for war.

Also france is doing more than most nations? ed: eek:[/quote:39315]

Yeah, they're offering airfields for use, and allowing the U.S miliotary to fly over their airspace, Belgium refused this.

The French also now are saying that if Sadaam should use chemical weapons, they will act. I think these are fine terms.

More than every other nation in the world aside from Britain, Australia and a couple other random nations who are totally supporting the U.S....

[quote="Big Jake":39315]Thinking that Hitler wouldn't attack Poland and they wanted more proof before they reacted. So then in all the French Wisdom they built their wall that was suspossed to hold the Germans. But hey, here is something the French didn't think of, Instead of attacking a full frontal assault like they were suspossed to, the Germans cheated and went around the wall. Those Bastards!! Before the French knew it, the Germans were walking down the streets of Paris and Hitler was doing his little victory dance.
Fast Forward a few years to Vietnam. Once again the Frenchies said that they needed more proof that the Viet Cong had a massive Army. So what happened? Dien Ben Phu. The French were cutoff and after a nice little fireworks display the French were out of Vietnam.
What is the point? The point is throughout history the Frenchies needed more proof before they decide to act. Little too late the French always got their asses kicked. Its the same thing now, they didn't want to help us when we asked for it, so fuck em! Don't let them say shit after post war Iraq.

Oh BTW Simo Häyhä this isn't alittle war who has 1 point and who doesnt. This is a nice conversation. Don't start anything you can't finish son. I don't wnat to turn this into a flame war.[/quote:39315]

You know, Britain also appeased the Germans, it wasn't just France.....In fact, it was Chamberlain who pushed to appease, more than the French themselves.

Can't you see that because of the fact they always get fucked over, they are sitting this one out for a while....They're in no direct danger like they were in WW1 & WW2, so they can safely do so. Apparently Bush doesn't rerally care about his soldiers lives as much as the French government does.

[Milla]

[quote="Low spark":4d703]Millla, Then why does the US have WMDs if it has no intention of using them? A deterant?[/quote:4d703]

I think they were mostly for the cold war, and to protect us incase of a nuclear war, well not protect atleast have something to give payback.

[LoneGunner87]

Their not gonna help us just like they didnt in WW2 we had to save their buts from hitler and his nazi friends and what do we get in return. O im sorri were not gonna help you were just a small ass contry thats afraid of everything. I think this is the last time were gonna help them sooner or later their gonna need help and we wont be their to help them.

[Old Reliable]

Originally Posted by LoneGunner87

Their not gonna help us just like they didnt in WW2 we had to save their buts from hitler and his nazi friends and what do we get in return. O im sorri were not gonna help you were just a small ass contry thats afraid of everything. I think this is the last time were gonna help them sooner or later their gonna need help and we wont be their to help them.

first of all...SHUT THE HELL UP. second of all. have you no sympathy for a country that was under Nazi occupation, losing thousands of lives? also, why the hell do the French have to help us invade lowly Iraq? each country acts on its own...

[LoneGunner87]

Sorri bout that my dim witted friend got a hold of the computer while i was away. First of all yes i agree with u Old they were under nazi control for a while. Second we dont even need the french to invade a country like iraq. Again sorri for the disturbance.

[Arkan]

[quote="Old Reliable":b25fe]

Originally Posted by LoneGunner87

Their not gonna help us just like they didnt in WW2 we had to save their buts from hitler and his nazi friends and what do we get in return. O im sorri were not gonna help you were just a small ass contry thats afraid of everything. I think this is the last time were gonna help them sooner or later their gonna need help and we wont be their to help them.

first of all...SHUT THE HELL UP. second of all. have you no sympathy for a country that was under Nazi occupation, losing thousands of lives? also, why the hell do the French have to help us invade lowly Iraq? each country acts on its own...[/quote:b25fe]

Fuck those pussies. Those pussies LET Germany waltz right in and take over. Fuck them and their pussy ways......now they want to make ammends?? Fuck 'em in the ass i say !!

[LoneGunner87]

They had no defense watsoever its not their fault their army wasnt strong enough to take on hitler dont blame them. Russia and Germany are still sufffering from the war so is france.

[Innoxx]

Yeah, even a human wasteland like Lonegunner can see that Arken. Pussies eh? Well, not everybody has the courage to bomb a third world country full of brown people and call it a war.

[Arkan]

Originally Posted by Innoxx

Yeah, even a human wasteland like Lonegunner can see that Arken. Pussies eh? Well, not everybody has the courage to bomb a third world country full of brown people and call it a war.

I guess going into WWll on the European front was a pussy move for the U.S. too huh?
Hey, where do terrorists come from?? Those same 3rd world countries full of lil' brown people?? You're right, thank god the U.S. has the courage to go against most countries in the world and bomb Iraq. You know the F****h were'nt gonna do a damn thing...as usual !!

[Ydiss]

Is America being attacked? Is an evil tirant invading them? Are the Americas a conquered nation?

No.

Why the hell do France have to help fight Iraq?

Excuse me for thinking this but it seems to me that Americans in general like war and are actually looking forward to seeing Iraqis die (at least this is the case with most Americans that I see discussing war on any of the many game boards I visit).

The only nation that thinks this war is needed/wanted is America. Believe me when I say that British people do not want this war.

Blair is almost totally alone in believing this war is the right thing to do. He's gone completely against opinion polls and his decision to go to war has caused the biggest revolt in a British political party in history. Brave? Stupid? That's his perogative.

So, based on this, I suppose the British must be pussies, too? This means that anyone who does not wish to proactively take part in the death of people is a pussy?

Stupid mentality.

France has absolutely no obligation to help America or Britain fight a war they are going to wage. I'm 100% certain that they would help if Iraq attacked one of the Allied nations though.

As they have just said.

Damn, they must be complete bastards... not wanting to kill people...

Unbelievable.

[Old Reliable]

lol! so I guess we shoujld blame Poland for superior German technology, and Netherlands, and Belgium, and Norway and Russia hake: