Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > FPS Gaming General Discussion > MoH General Discussion
Reload this Page cod vs moh
MoH General Discussion General Discussion about Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, expansions and Pacific Assault

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#31)
Paintballr is Offline
Sergeant
 
Posts: 1,308
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte NC, US
  Send a message via AIM to Paintballr  
Default 11-08-2003, 06:08 PM

I heard some news that COD is going to have a patch out soon, they will be adding more maps and some more .30 cal. MG's and some protable ones to the game also so more guns u can pick for german and other teams but thats what i heard.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#32)
YourFragged is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 667
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kansas
 Send a message via ICQ to YourFragged Send a message via AIM to YourFragged Send a message via MSN to YourFragged  
Default 11-08-2003, 06:52 PM

^^ hope so
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#33)
Hobbs is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 839
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
   
Default 11-09-2003, 04:38 PM

we have the fg42 and added a mg to the russians on our server..... you can download the mod on our temp site. http://www.mohct.com

server ip: 66.230.141.179:12203

Firing Squad =Fs= (server name)

If you dont have the mod you can still play, you just wont be able to select the new weapons.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#34)
Hobbes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 278
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Basement
  Send a message via MSN to Hobbes  
Default 11-09-2003, 08:27 PM

What I havn't seen anyone talk about is ping, it dont matter a like it does in MOH. A 150 ping can compete with a 20 ping and I like to see someone run a MOH server with 60 peeps on it like you can in COD and still have it run nice and smooth.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#35)
CR1MiNaL is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 145
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ban Me
  Send a message via AIM to CR1MiNaL Send a message via MSN to CR1MiNaL  
Default 11-10-2003, 03:30 PM

i sure hope thats true cuz im getting CoD later today and im stuck on 56k for awhile annoy:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#36)
pest is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,828
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Buzzin around the dung pile...
   
Default 11-10-2003, 03:37 PM

The ping still matters. If you are a third of a second (333 ping) behind everyone else, they still have the advatage. Its just not nearly as pronounced in cod. The net code is more efficient so your ping times are most likely better. Its doesnt seem to be as hardware intensive so servers run better, etc, etc.

But when my ping starts creeping over 100, I can tell, hit the tab key and sure enough, my ping is up high. With COD I just get much better pings to everywhere.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#37)
Bane is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 703
Join Date: Oct 2002
   
Default 11-10-2003, 03:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by pest
With COD I just get much better pings to everywhere.
So true. I'm in Michigan. I played on a server located in Portugal and had a ping of 38. Awesome... couldn't understand a damn thing anyone was typing into the chat... but awesome nonetheless.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#38)
Eames is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,025
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa, FL or Charleston, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Eames Send a message via MSN to Eames  
Default 11-10-2003, 04:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobbs
we have the fg42 and added a mg to the russians on our server..... you can download the mod on our temp site. http://www.mohct.com

server ip: 66.230.141.179:12203

Firing Squad =Fs= (server name)

If you dont have the mod you can still play, you just wont be able to select the new weapons.
adding the fg-42 for the germans is great, but giving the russians the stg is wrong, the russian weapon selection is accurate....another version of your mod should be released that just adds the fg42 to axis weapon selection.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#39)
Hobbs is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 839
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
   
Default 11-11-2003, 08:11 PM

The russians are the only team without a mg.. since they already have a luger whats wrong with giving them the mp44? would you rather a BAR or possibly a sling shot? biggrin:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#40)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 11-12-2003, 03:03 PM

shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#41)
Eames is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,025
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa, FL or Charleston, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Eames Send a message via MSN to Eames  
Default 11-12-2003, 03:52 PM

[quote="Sgt Stryker":f1a47]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:f1a47]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#42)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 11-12-2003, 11:41 PM

[quote="Cpl. Eames":05f8f][quote="Sgt Stryker":05f8f]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:05f8f]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.[/quote:05f8f]

you ned to stop watching Enemy at the Gates and read the book. It was the RETREATING troops who were forced to make a stand who did not have enough guns, why, because they lost them in the reatreat (not expecting to be forced to make a stand), the reinforcements were generally well armed, especially infantry attached to tank brigades.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#43)
guarnere is Offline
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 4,535
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: new york
  Send a message via AIM to guarnere Send a message via MSN to guarnere  
Default 11-12-2003, 11:55 PM

no, the part you all are talking about on enemy at the gates...in real life would be russian prisoners sent to battle
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#44)
Eames is Offline
Command Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 2,025
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa, FL or Charleston, SC
  Send a message via AIM to Eames Send a message via MSN to Eames  
Default 11-13-2003, 04:52 PM

[quote="Sgt Stryker":58559][quote="Cpl. Eames":58559][quote="Sgt Stryker":58559]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:58559]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.[/quote:58559]

you ned to stop watching Enemy at the Gates and read the book. It was the RETREATING troops who were forced to make a stand who did not have enough guns, why, because they lost them in the reatreat (not expecting to be forced to make a stand), the reinforcements were generally well armed, especially infantry attached to tank brigades.[/quote:58559]

you misunderstood what i wrote, i said that most russian soldiers carried mosin nagants and ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to manufacture and thats why the russians werent given a mg in cod because its accurate.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#45)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 11-13-2003, 05:14 PM

[quote="Cpl. Eames":af8f2][quote="Sgt Stryker":af8f2][quote="Cpl. Eames":af8f2][quote="Sgt Stryker":af8f2]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:af8f2]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.[/quote:af8f2]

you ned to stop watching Enemy at the Gates and read the book. It was the RETREATING troops who were forced to make a stand who did not have enough guns, why, because they lost them in the reatreat (not expecting to be forced to make a stand), the reinforcements were generally well armed, especially infantry attached to tank brigades.[/quote:af8f2]

you misunderstood what i wrote, i said that most russian soldiers carried mosin nagants and ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to manufacture and thats why the russians werent given a mg in cod because its accurate.[/quote:af8f2]

uh, no, the standard issue squad LMG was the DP-28, there weren't enough in early war, but the late-war unit where you storm Warsaw and Berlin would at least have one DP-28 per squad.
So you should at least see DP-28s in teh Warsaw and Berlin missions (with like 1 or 2 during the Stalingrad campaign)

BTW. the Germans didn't have STGs in Stalingrad, did they?
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.