Bin Laden video warns of more 9-11 attacks - Page 3

Short Hand · 10-30-2004, 11:49 AM

[quote=Colonel]

Quote:

Originally Posted by "daffy.":a44b9

What the hell is Osama doing alive...

Good question. Maybe we should ask the guys in the last administration. They supposedly had OBL handed to the them on a platter several times and did nothing...and this after he had already tried to bomb the WTC once.

There is enough blame to go around on this guy. We should not be looking back worrying about who could have done what, IMO, we should be lloking ahead to what we need to do to get these guys. I like the "cut off the money" idea.[/quote:a44b9]

this was before 911. If it were Bush in the same situation he would have done the same as Clinton. Post 911 Bush should have been awol. knowing what the man is fully capable of and his intentions.

Coleman · 10-30-2004, 11:49 AM

[quote="Bean 2":7b2c3] Obviously we cant say Kerry will fix all our problems, but he certainly can do a better job then the retard thats in office now.[/quote:7b2c3]and obviously you CAN'T say he will do a better job.

Anita_Man · 10-30-2004, 11:50 AM

[quote:686ac]Ok, but we should also be looking at our current president who either has no clue wtf hes doing, or hes lying to us. How could you send troops to afghanistan to fight the people who actually attacked us, then divert them to invade Iraq who had nothing to do with the attacks? Its so obvious that there is something going on here that their not telling us. There are at least 60 other nations with nuclear weapons yet we choose to attack Iraq? That makes sense(sarcasm). Obviously we cant say Kerry will fix all our problems, but he certainly can do a better job then the retard thats in office now.
[/quote:686ac]

If some one had a hit on your dad and you could get him would you? thats what bush is doing. plus his oil connections and contracters. this war is money for bush. he dont worry about Bin laden remember.

Coleman · 10-30-2004, 11:51 AM

[quote="Anita_Head":117c2][quote:117c2]Ok, but we should also be looking at our current president who either has no clue wtf hes doing, or hes lying to us. How could you send troops to afghanistan to fight the people who actually attacked us, then divert them to invade Iraq who had nothing to do with the attacks? Its so obvious that there is something going on here that their not telling us. There are at least 60 other nations with nuclear weapons yet we choose to attack Iraq? That makes sense(sarcasm). Obviously we cant say Kerry will fix all our problems, but he certainly can do a better job then the retard thats in office now.
[/quote:117c2]

If some one had a hit on your dad and you could get him would you? thats what bush is doing. plus his oil connections and contracters. this war is money for bush. he dont worry about Bin laden remember.[/quote:117c2]i have no clue what the hell you were trying to say...type again in english please.

Short Hand · 10-30-2004, 11:53 AM

Colemon, do you always resort to those low blows without your brain power here ? (TGB/Noc)

Coleman · 10-30-2004, 01:19 PM

[quote="Short Hand":0ac42]Colemon, do you always resort to those low blows without your brain power here ? (TGB/Noc)[/quote:0ac42]no, i'm serious. I couldn't tell whether he/she was making an arguement against or for Bush. I really couldn't understand it.

Short Hand · 10-30-2004, 01:30 PM

it's not rocket science.

Anita_Man · 10-30-2004, 02:22 PM

dont you remember in the 1st golf war suddam put a 25 million$ hit for gearge bushes head? well as a son would you let this fly if you had the powere to get the guy? as for the oil and contracting, bush has ties in them businesses.

[quote:c3db7]no, i'm serious. I couldn't tell whether he/she was making an arguement against or for Bush. I really couldn't understand it. [/quote:c3db7]

there against bush.

imported_Fluffy_Bunny · 10-30-2004, 02:29 PM

Kerry wants to double the number of Special Forces & go after the real terrorists, I'm with him.

rdeyes · 10-30-2004, 10:13 PM

its kinda funny how we just say that we know where he is and then this tape surfaces..

Colonel · 10-31-2004, 10:45 AM

[quote="Short Hand":4d690]this was before 911. If it were Bush in the same situation he would have done the same as Clinton. Post 911 [/quote:4d690]

I disagree. Bin Laden and his henchmen tried to blow up the WTC once before. They did kill scores of Marines in that one bombing. How soon we forget.

Mr.Buttocks · 10-31-2004, 10:46 AM

Smoke and mirrors. eek:

Jimmy Paterson · 11-01-2004, 03:50 PM

bush is better then kerry, there are only 2 things I like about kerry, he wants to double the special forces and keep jobs in americas

Short Hand · 11-01-2004, 04:25 PM

[quote=Colonel]

Quote:

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":1265e

this was before 911. If it were Bush in the same situation he would have done the same as Clinton. Post 911

I disagree. Bin Laden and his henchmen tried to blow up the WTC once before. They did kill scores of Marines in that one bombing. How soon we forget.[/quote:1265e]

Fact is he wasnt important enough "or so everyone thought" for a cruise missle or air strike. No one did. Or at least a majorrity of Americans did before the events of sept 11th. Maybe you did because you have a time machine and can tell about these things, but a majority of America would have just been pissed.Its really something "like Iraq" you have an opinion on. + Im still sure sept 11th would have gone down, Osama deputy's are just as capable as him, if not even more.

guarnere · 11-01-2004, 05:34 PM

Bush wins.