[m00nraker]

I..........must..........win..........

[elstatec]

Shorthands entry is a shitty cropped image with a border and all who voted for it should be ashamed. die now.

vote moonraker because at least his cropped image looks good and isnt shitty quality.

plus he isnt a pillpopping-ricerloving-jungleloving-frenchcanadian-chav.

[Stammer]

Originally Posted by elstatec

Shorthands entry is a shitty cropped image with a border and all who voted for it should be ashamed. die now.

vote moonraker because at least his cropped image looks good and isnt shitty quality.

plus he isnt a pillpopping-ricerloving-jungleloving-frenchcanadian-chav.

[img]http://jesusburger.net/ghost4.jpg[/img]

rock:

[Short Hand]

Originally Posted by elstatec

Shorthands entry is a shitty cropped image with a border and all who voted for it should be ashamed. die now.

vote moonraker because at least his cropped image looks good and isnt shitty quality.

plus he isnt a pillpopping-ricerloving-jungleloving-frenchcanadian-chav.

LOL, not quite.

[img]http://www.carlspackler.com/images/cs_sndtk_ft.jpg[/img]

The Sig

[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v449/ShortHandz/Regular%20Sigs/caddyshack11243copy.jpg[/img]

1. Caddyshack tex cut out and re sized/moved.

2. Groundhog choped out, cleaned up(aka ersaer tool, bit of blurring) (and moved)

3. Layer doubled up and overlayed.

4. sligth desaturation on the overlay

5. slight motion blur on the overlay

6. invisible brush lighting done threw out the sig on small sections, their faces, clothes etc. Lighting = changed.

7. RED 2 pixel size border. (matches the text's red)

8. PSD avalible if you wish to inspect it yourself.

Simple.. Yes. Effective ? Seems to be. Technically it has more done to it over the blues brother sig, which is 2 faces cut out and placed on the white background (great looking still, not bashing it). I expected more from you limy loney:

[m00nraker]

I like it. And yeah, its more then i did to mine.

[elstatec]

[quote="Short Hand":981cc]blbha blahblahblhalvhaq 1 2 43 5 6 7[/quote:981cc]


all you did can be done in 2 steps to look exactly the shit same

1. cut text move it down.
2. put contrast up.

sleeping:

die.

[Short Hand]

[quote=elstatec]

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":9edc6

blbha blahblahblhalvhaq 1 2 43 5 6 7

all you did can be done in 2 steps to look exactly the shit same

1. cut text move it down.
2. put contrast up.

sleeping:

die.[/quote:9edc6]
How about you take losing like a man bitch ? filthy limy chav scum mad: . Seriously fuck face your comment was really uncalled for, the DW is no place for bullshit like that, even if it were just a "crop" and it looked good enough to catch people's attentionl, let it fucking win. rolleyes:

[elstatec]

WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH

im not jealous i just see this and see entries like zoners etc which should win outright, but dont because there are so many nubs here who should be shot.

[Short Hand]

Originally Posted by elstatec

WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH

im not jealous i just see this and see entries like zoners etc which should win outright, but dont because there are so many nubs here who should be shot.

That is a problem when designing for a DW, design for the audience/client. and those "nubs" outnumber you. Period. Thats all that counts in the end.

[Tystnad]

Enough bitching now. I think the voting is about to end anyways.

[elstatec]

die.

[Judas]

short


: i really dont give a shit what he did to get to the finished, it looks best imo. this isnt the 'who can do the wickedest shit technically war', its design war, and his design is clearly the best.

[Sirus]

those are some sad entrys, prot got my vote

[eeves]

bullit...

[Short Hand]

3 magical votes when most of the forum has already voted eek: