Quote:
Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
On Sale! oOo:
Who buys those kind of guns? eek:
|
Americans who think the king of england is gonna come over and shit in their cornflakes. biggrin:
|
LOL
Peoples arguments seem to me, based mostly on emotion rather than fact or research. If their position is so consistent, please tell me the reasons for banning the .50 BMG. Then please explain if these reasons do or do not also apply to the .338 Lapua Magnum. Furthermore, please explain if there are any caliber of weapon you would not ban, and why
Believe it or not there are still some Americans who believe in the integrity of the 2nd amendment. Fact is .50 caliber rifles are not used in crimes, since they are too large for normal criminal behavior. They are among the most expensive rifles out there, confining their purchase to dedicated marksmen and collects.
I find it interesting that most people overlook the .50 cal as a major sporting rifle.Most people who own .50 caliber rifles are long-range target shooting experts. For more than a century, long-range target shooting competitions have attracted marksmen, and modern .50 caliber rifles are among the most accurate for long-range shooting.
Also Mk211 military ammunition is strictly controlled by the US armed forces and not available to the general public.
I can probably predict that you're going to use ".50 cals can be used by terrorists to shoot down airplanes" argument. Fact is the average Barret holds up t0 7 rounds. My cousin just happens to be an airline CAPT. for a major airline in the U.S. He also is a proud owner of a .50cal (12.7mm for you eurotypes). He has flow the entire inventory of his company's aircraft. He states that in order to bring down a 747-400 model, their would have to be multiple weapons fire by that caliber using ALOT of ammunition, and they would have to be aimed and hit all four turbofans to make the ship drop. One or two will simply not do it. This is why it has yet to be attempted by a terrorist organization. The real threat he and others of his profession worry about are A.) A shoulder fired AGM, and B.) A small general aviation aircraft used as a ramming craft. Even Dr. John Lott has pointed out that using a single shot or semi-auto weapon against an aircraft is nearly useless. He states "when firing small arms at aircraft was in vogue, machine guns were considered marginally effective, with cannon or larger weapons being preferred. Single shots from single weapons were not considered useful."
Oh and California has recently banned the .50 cal BMG from their state (big surprise there). Yet you can still buy a .50 cal black powder rifle there. rolleyes:
Just my 2 cents, i know you'll both flame me for this calmdown:
http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/NRO50CaliberCBS.html read this article to find out more if you dare so please