[Machette]

oOo:

[Mr.Buttocks]

Originally Posted by Machette

oOo:

HEY! YOU! HI!

[Machette]

[img]http://ktog.net/upload/woo!.gif[/img]

[Mr.Buttocks]

happy:

[Machette]

the_finger:

[Short Hand]

Buttocks, that website... from what angle were those pictures taken ?

Lets comapre.

oilempire picture.

[img]http://www.oilempire.us/graphics/new_pic.jpg[/img]


Picture Used in the letsroll.org & the in plane site bio.

[img]http://www.daplayazclub.com/uploads/911watch11.jpg[/img]

/////////////

[img]http://www.daplayazclub.com/uploads/911watch11222.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www.oilempire.us/graphics/misslepod.jpg[/img]

where was that image from the bogus website used ? it doesnt look like any Sept 11th photo...

Im not saying this is true, only that that site does a piss poor job at diss prooving any of these 911 theory sites.[/img]

[Vance]

[img]http://www.oilempire.us/graphics/no-pod-767.jpg[/img]

Oh noes, another missle pod oOo:

calmdown:

[Mr.Buttocks]

[quote="Short Hand":abe26]Buttocks, that website... from what angle were those pictures taken ?

Lets comapre.

oilempire picture.

[img]http://www.oilempire.us/graphics/new_pic.jpg[/img]

[/quote:abe26]

That image was first posted by the idiots over at [url:abe26]http://www.letsroll911.org[/url:abe26] in [url=http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=1185:abe26]this[/url:abe26] post on their forums. Don't buy into the pod theory, it's BS.

[Short Hand]

im not buying into the whole pod thing. It is suspicious none the less. Im more concerned about the pentagon other then anything else. And the Senator Dayton cliams (via your sig).


Im just saying that oil empire does a horrible job at dissproving letsroll.org. More thought should be put into it./ more research.

[TGB!]

[quote="Short Hand":286ba][quote="TGB!":286ba]The "documentary" presents a logical fallacy: that the ONLY responses to this movie can be anger, denial and acceptance. As for the rest of it, its "questions" that have been brought up before and we've had conspiracy theories before. This isnt a magic bullet killing the president and shattering the govener of Texas's hand - although science COULD explain all that - this is something to me that is pretty blatant and obvious.[/quote:286ba]


sounds to me like a Bush fan boi in the 2nd stage. rolleyes: Violently opposed / Persons which will do anything possible to discredit the video. & "Facts"[/quote:286ba]

SHOCKING! Short Hand doesnt know what logical fallacies are. I've been put in my place damnit.

To assume that the only responses to this film could be Violent/Uncontrolled anger at being presented with fact or acceptance of what has been known all along is a severe logical fallacy that would get you kicked out of any forensics club ASAP.

[Short Hand]

[quote:79ecb]The pod is there. Period.
If the pod is there then it's VERY likely that it's purpose is to conceal the missile. If the pod and the missile are real, then the planes were switched.
The switch very likely occured at the point in the flight path where a very sharp "turn" is visible.
http://www.phatmax.net/wtc/?s=ual175_aal11.gif
Switching the planes could have easily been proven with FAA radar data.
FAA radar data was quickly destroyed.
An attempt by several key tower personnel to document the strange events they had just witnessed by making a tape recording was crushed.
This crucial tape was crushed, cut into many pieces and thrown into several different waste baskets by the senior manager.
A huge cover-up took place immediately after the planes crashed.
The cover-up involved FAA, FBI, and others.
All these things are established FACTS.

One thing leads to another.
No way around it...
Plenty of focus, here.
Skeptics can simply post a link to their own forums.
Back to work.[/quote:79ecb]

I found that post intresting. I am still not buying into the whole pod theory, but this intrests me.

TGB I am not wasting my time with you today.
[/quote]

[Short Hand]

I found the third paGE OF THE THREAD. really intresting, one of the best reads I have had in a long time.

http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin ... c&start=30

[Tripper]

sleeping: sleeping: sleeping:

[MrLevinstein]

Why must we argue about what was on the plane yadda yadda?

I know a plan was crashed into our centers, and terrorists did it. 9/11 taught me that no matter where you come from what you believe or who you are friends with when your countrymen die, you get pissed, you bond and things get tighter.

This thread needs lock, because mel gibson from conspiracy theory is coming out of the woodowkr to give his opinion on this crap, right before the black helocopters get him

[Albow0001]

Originally Posted by MrLevinstein

Why must we argue about what was on the plane yadda yadda?

I know a plan was crashed into our centers, and terrorists did it. 9/11 taught me that no matter where you come from what you believe or who you are friends with when your countrymen die, you get pissed, you bond and things get tighter.

This thread needs lock, because mel gibson from conspiracy theory is coming out of the woodowkr to give his opinion on this crap, right before the black helocopters get him

Fucking idiot, the point of the last 5 pages was to prove that terrorists DIDN'T do it, and that the country you're bonding under could very well have been responsible.
Sorry, i just hate seeing things like that where people come out of the blue and state something totally against what people have been talking about...happens way too often to get a "lol" anymore...

Personally, i find it interesting, but i'd very much like to see a video on 9-11 published that's only like the first HALF of that video. When you present problems, as much as we freak out because there are no solutions and we all think "wtf am i watching this for", as long as you're not trying to push some specific theory, your error-detections tend to be a lot less biased. If you could just present a movie about 9-11 that didn't warp every bit of information to reach one conclusion or another, i think it would be far better.