arlington. eerie now thinking that i was there and didn't even know KK was buried there.
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3370/washington032oo0.jpg[/img]
artsy crap. taken at 65mph+
[img]http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/3125/washington035gq3.jpg[/img]
how've you been enjoying the new cameras? i noticed you were starting to dabble with poloroidish stuff a while ago. damn nice stuff man
that veteran was such a cool guy. he was telling me about a biker rally going on like 3 days after I was supposed to leave. his name was Smitty. what sucks about those pics is that i lost so much contrast scanning them in, they look so much clearer before scanning, which is also one reason i'm interested in digital
it's just that the pics aren't very clear. the contrast tool doesn't really change sharpness. i should have been more clear. i think it's just my scanner
it's just that the pics aren't very clear. the contrast tool doesn't really change sharpness. i should have been more clear. i think it's just my scanner
i've been thinking of buying a film scanner now that i'm shooting film. i'm not sure on how much quality i can get for a low price. i have no money.
ours is just a officejet k80. it's almost only used for copying stuff around the house. i sometimes use the one at school, it's pretty decent. how did you upload those film ones earlier? they look fantastic
good ol' walmart. they have an option to develop film to a cd, so i've been doing that. it works great usually unless you're doing a lot of analogue experimental stuff such as multiple exposures.