[Maplegyver]

why is there such a dislike between americans and candaians?

[Pyro]

his extremist right views made him a poor president.

[Tripper]

Originally Posted by Pyro

his extremist right views made him a poor president.

<Trippar> http://www2.foxsearchlight.com/napoleon ... /index.php
<Trippar> Its Pyro

[elstatec]

pyro i know why your like this, you are so jealous that members here are american and you damn god he missed by a few 1000 miles

[Coleman]

Originally Posted by Tripper

<Trippar> http://www2.foxsearchlight.com/napoleon ... /index.php
<Trippar> Its Pyro

LOL

[Pyro]

Originally Posted by Tripper

<Trippar> http://www2.foxsearchlight.com/napoleon ... /index.php
<Trippar> Its Pyro

sleeping:

[Tripper]

Originally Posted by Pyro

sleeping:

If you sleep through it, you'll miss it, dummy. ITS YOU!!!!!!1

[Short Hand]

[quote="Garry Coleman":0357b]owned once again. Short Hand..give the fuck up and die.[/quote:0357b]

not really Garry no where close.

[Short Hand]

Originally Posted by ShagNasty

The Soviet Union destroys it self and Reagan gets the credit, I find that very funny. Carter made the real deal for hostages in iraq who got the credit? I was 13 or so so I remember the real truth not historys version of what happened. i loved the kechup for schools vegtable too. lmao doesnt even know its a fruit.

lol shag nasty supports me a little bit, ..I never thought i would see this day ed:

[MrLevinstein]

[quote="Short Hand":1274b]

Originally Posted by ShagNasty

The Soviet Union destroys it self and Reagan gets the credit, I find that very funny. Carter made the real deal for hostages in iraq who got the credit? I was 13 or so so I remember the real truth not historys version of what happened. i loved the kechup for schools vegtable too. lmao doesnt even know its a fruit.

lol shag nasty supports me a little bit, ..I never thought i would see this day ed:[/quote:1274b]

Support from one cumstain to another, true brotherhood.

[elstatec]

[quote=MrLevinstein]

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":c0e9d

lol shag nasty supports me a little bit, ..I never thought i would see this day ed:

Support from one cumstain to another, true brotherhood.[/quote:c0e9d]


rofl.

[Short Hand]

Originally Posted by Colonel

Well, it's Father's Day so I don't have much time. I'll get to the rest of this stuff later but here is a couple of facts for ya:

1)
Spending on AIDS takes off; U.S. outlays nearly equal cancer or heart research

The Associated Press - Thursday, July 15, 1989


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOSTON - The federal government will spend nearly as much this year on AIDS research and prevention as it will for cancer or heart disease and far more than it devotes to other major killers, an analysis shows.
And if current trends continue, such spending on AIDS will surpass that of all other diseases for the first time next year, researchers said. ....."We were surprised to learn the extent to which so many different individuals and agencies were involved in AIDS efforts," said Dr. William Winkenwerder. The analysis shows that AIDS spending -- more than $2 billion this year -- makes up nearly 10 percent of the total budget of the U.S. Public Health Service, which oversees government medical research, and by 1992, will account for nearly 13 percent. ......The report said that from 1982, when the epidemic began, to the end of this year, the federal government will have spent $5.5 billion on illness caused by HIV, the AIDS virus.

In 1989, federal AIDS spending will total $2.2 billion, or about 1 percent of all federal health expenditures. Of this, about $1.3 billion will be spent for research and prevention. The disease will kill 35,000 people.

By comparison, the government will spend $1.5 billion on research and prevention of cancer, which will kill 500,000 people this year, and $1 billion for heart disease, which will kill 777,000 Americans.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This article is from 1989 - of course, it's after President Reagan left office, but it sheds a little light on what the thinking was at the time - the debate always was how much should you spend on a disease that kills a fraction of the number of people killed by cancer? - and, keep in mind that Federal budgets are approved a year, or sometimes more, in advance. But the main thing to consider is that the article points out " 1982, when the epidemic began," As I said before, this thing was new during his presidency and to me it is hard to fault an administration for not reacting quickly enough to something that they had no way of knowing would turn out to be the way it is.


2) Your quoting the same article referenced in my post. I don't see any facts in that article, only some guy spewing his own political agenda. Here are the facts about HUD...

[img]http://www.colonelbrands.com/images/hudasstch.gif[/img]

As you can see HUD spending increased every year of President Reagan's years in office. (the last couple of years it held fairly steady - increasing only slightly) I don't know when the term "homeless" was invented. It seems like I've heard it all of my life, but I could be wrong. I can tell you that seeing homeless guys was not "a curiosity" before President Reagan - I saw them all the time.

3) I forget the actual stat, but it's something like - the top 5% of the income producing folks in America pay 90% of the taxes. To say that giving everybody a 1% cut is unfair because that means a rich guy gets more in terms of actual dollars, to me, is silly. Of course, they get more back! They pay more in the first place! This same debate came up when President Bush was talking about his cuts. They interviewed some really low income women on TV who was irate that she wasn't getting anything. It turns out her income was so low she paid zero taxes. She paid zero but wanted something out of the tax cut. Unbelieveable. We have become a society that just wants to know "what's in it for me". Everybody has their hand out.

4) I'll have to get into the deregulation debate later. That is a whole 'nuther topic.

1. You didnt compare it to other presidency's.
2. You did't even get it during Reagen's Term.
3. that chart looks like a quick microsoft excel chop up, give me a link please to the site. (even though the info on it is not that impressing).

as it seems you just uploaded this today to this site (is it your site)

hudasstch.gif 20-Jun-2004 08:01 7k at 8:01 around the time of your post. Why not just remotely link it as you should ? are you concerned about the sites bandwidth ? or is this just your excel work as it looks.

link for more to see this-http://<b> <a href="http://www.colon...mages/</a></b>

in relation to the taxes.

typical for a capitilistic view, to see that. You would think that helping the poor with larger cuts would help out. How much is the government making off them in the first plaxce in taxes ???? Their is a reason these friggin rich people are responsible for 90 %.... because they are filthy rich. So. WHy not just give the poor who don't have that much to give the government in the first place a larger tax cut then their rich counter parts ????? if its only 10 % ? would this not give them the needed power to better themselves, and oddly enough put more money into the economy itself how little it may be. Poverty is a vicious cycle that most people don't quite understand until you are exposed to it clearly. My family itself at 1 point was on welfare for nearly half a year up in Canada. If it had not been for those checks in those months while my single mother with a baby would probably would have had to given up custody of us. compasion for the poor people, it hard to give but it works miracles.

http://www.colonelbrands.com ... mind me if im wrong but this looks like it may be your site, since their is no way to upload images to this site via public, unless your a web master. your name is colonel, your avatar is in "theme" of all of the stuff on that site........WHat a source to use peole "YOU OWN CHART"

If garry had half a brain while reading this and not huis current state of fanboy mentallity he my have seen all the fualts that came with it. I guess he see's large formations of words in order and he thinks that must be ownage. sorry but it ain't. ed:

[Short Hand]

[quote=MrLevinstein]

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":1bdb7

lol shag nasty supports me a little bit, ..I never thought i would see this day ed:

Support from one cumstain to another, true brotherhood.[/quote:1bdb7]

im a cumstain for being semi liberal & not liking the glory Regan is getting undeservedly ? Ni&&a please. Slanderous shit on your behalf.

[elstatec]

jesus why do you care now, hes dead leave it

[MrLevinstein]

Youre a cumstain because youre a cocky arrogant dipshit who thinks he knows better then people that live in the country that you critize. Id probably like you if you didnt stick your nose in our buisness all the time.