NEW: AA.com's GIRLY THREAD - Page 8

Innoxx · 03-04-2003, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoxx

Dude, it's porn. Take if from me, I know the difference.

sorry if those pictures wernt the kind you like here try this one

[img]http://www.dodstudios.net/uploads/uploads/073034254.jpg[/img]

Oh boy, Pornography is not about the amount of clothing they wear. It's a picture, movie, book, etc. with the sole-purpose of causing sexual arousal. This thread = PORN.

newbieassulted · 03-04-2003, 01:51 AM

by definition i think you are right

03-04-2003, 06:45 PM

[quote:23f6e]Oh boy, Pornography is not about the amount of clothing they wear. It's a picture, movie, book, etc. with the sole-purpose of causing sexual arousal. This thread = PORN.[/quote:23f6e]

then all your pics were porno to so ever since this thread started it was porno freak:

Innoxx · 03-04-2003, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMan

[quote:60acd]Oh boy, Pornography is not about the amount of clothing they wear. It's a picture, movie, book, etc. with the sole-purpose of causing sexual arousal. This thread = PORN.

then all your pics were porno to so ever since this thread started it was porno freak:[/quote:60acd]

No, my pics are not about sexual arousal. They're about beautiful women, not some cheap floozy that had to be heavily airbrushed to cover all the boils and systs.

03-04-2003, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoxx

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMan

[quote:5c4ec]Oh boy, Pornography is not about the amount of clothing they wear. It's a picture, movie, book, etc. with the sole-purpose of causing sexual arousal. This thread = PORN.

then all your pics were porno to so ever since this thread started it was porno freak:

No, my pics are not about sexual arousal. They're about beautiful women, not some cheap floozy that had to be heavily airbrushed to cover all the boils and systs.[/quote:5c4ec]

ya and thats why there half naked then

newbieassulted · 03-05-2003, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMan

[img]http://www.dodstudios.net/uploads/uploads/p.jpg[/img]

now THATS streching the limit.

Bazooka_Joe · 03-05-2003, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoxx

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMan

[quote:01be3]Oh boy, Pornography is not about the amount of clothing they wear. It's a picture, movie, book, etc. with the sole-purpose of causing sexual arousal. This thread = PORN.

then all your pics were porno to so ever since this thread started it was porno freak:

No, my pics are not about sexual arousal. They're about beautiful women, not some cheap floozy that had to be heavily airbrushed to cover all the boils and systs.[/quote:01be3]

Pornos have chicks with boils and systs?! Sweet jesus, that's just gross! lol

And yes, that chick pic is pushing the limit.

guarnere · 03-05-2003, 01:17 PM

hey superman how about i come to canada and tea bag you...that picture of calvin in ur sig is wrooooooong man.... hake:

Bazooka_Joe · 03-05-2003, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guarnere

hey superman how about i come to canada and tea bag you...that picture of calvin in ur sig is wrooooooong man.... hake:

I wasn't going to touch that subject, but I PMed him.

Sparrow · 03-05-2003, 07:21 PM

For the record...

He is an ass and Canadans are not like that, he is just the pro war scum that gives this country the little bad name we have.

YOUR NOT A FUKING REPRESENTATIVE!

Do something pro Canada than rather badmouth the USA you filly POS.

USA is our neighbour! And family!