I'm reserve. Calgary Highlanders, which is Infantry.

And even though the C6 was awesome to fire, I would not want to lug that thing around the battlefield. Its a platoon support weapon so there is only 1 in a platoon, which is good. I'd rather have my trusty C7. And yes, i'm back home now. I went through about 500 rounds of blanks in my C7 over last week in Waneright. Got an arty sim in my trench which was scary as hell because your not supposed to be within 15 metres of the thing when it goes off because it's got the blast of a stick of dynamite. Did recce patrols and section attacks where I went through 6 mags in 10 minutes. Awesome stuff.

NO Spam
 

since you payed a det to the great country of Canada i wont spam this\
biggrin:

You mean debt?

Looks alot like our 240.

http://www.hk94.com/m240b.html

Same characterists too: 7.62 ammo, belt-fed, carrying handle. The only thing looking different is our hand guards for the barrel.

my fav.
nity hows this one?
http://www.army.dnd.ca/LF/English/2_0_3 ... uSection=2

Thats the same as a C9 just with the C79 Scope. Take my word for it, you don't really need scopes on machine guns. They get in the way, and besides, thats what tracers are for. biggrin:

[quote="Bazooka_Joe":0f022]Looks alot like our 240.

[url="http://www.hk94.com/m240b.html"]http://www.hk94.com/m240b.html[/url]

Same characterists too: 7.62 ammo, belt-fed, carrying handle. The only thing looking different is our hand guards for the barrel.[/quote:0f022]

Really, they are the same. Diemaco bought the rights to produce them along with the M16A2, M249, etc. Basicly the same guns, the only major differences are the markings on the gun, the name, and the manufactor.

LOL, the good old spray n' pray, eh?

Glad you're having fun.

Its actually harder to hit your target with that scope than it is to use the iron sights. Normally, you just make sure your on with the scope fore a few rounds then look above the scope. You can't see shit through the scope because of all the debris your making.