![]() |
ENJOY BF1942: Deset Combat NOW!...while it's still free.
I heard this rumor awhile ago, and then it was confirmed that EA was interested in DC. Seems now its a full on go.
[quote:f485d]The highlights include Medal of Honor: Desert Heat for the PC and Xbox, a follow-up to the award-winning first-person shooter series that will be set in the Middle East; Command & Conquer: Generals - Sandstorm, an expansion pack to the popular real-time strategy game that will continue the conflict between the USA, China, and the GLA terrorist faction; Battlefield 1942: Desert Combat, an expansion pack based on a popular user-created mod for the hit multiplayer shooter; and Powermonger 2: Thirst for War, a sequel to famed game designer Peter Molyneux's 1990 strategy game that will be set in the Middle East.[/quote:f485d] [url=http://www.gamespot.com/all/news/news_6024279.html:f485d]Here's hoping they take the COUNTER STRIKE approach and keep this as a free download, and a pay product for those without the speed or common sense to get it online.[/url:f485d] |
...and, PLEASE god let this be an April Fools news story.
|
God EA is teh suk!
|
Not surprised if the DC thing is real, damn monopolizing sons of a bitch. Hopefully it will stay free, for the online community, though I am never installing that game agian.
|
Quote:
|
Definately, if it is released, I bet it will be deemed on the box or somehwere as a "whole new game" and be $50, and there will only be 1 patch released, if any, and that would be it, they'll look for another mod to buy. The DC team probably won't even get any credit, and very little revenue.
|
Guys, we have been approached by a few publishers, but nothing has been finalized. We aim to keep it like CS in that you will be able to download it for free if you have BF1942.
|
[quote="SW-14":37195]Guys, we have been approached by a few publishers, but nothing has been finalized. We aim to keep it like CS in that you will be able to download it for free if you have BF1942.[/quote:37195]
Dunno SW, that article makes it seem PRETTY CLEAR that EA wants this mod under their umbrella. And why not. Its shaping up to be a PRETTY popular modification for BF1942, and why mods are exactly what games need to extend the longevity of a product, which in turn means more revenue for the publisher. Honestly - without CS, I cant imagine HL would have the kind of impact it has now....that mod has singlehandedly made Online Gaming the force it is today. I can EASILY see a BF:1942 bundle with DESERT COMBAT. You AUTOMATICALLY get two games in one. |
Well Ed, I know for a fact that the article is false. I know we haven't signed any agreements with EA. Heck, Frank's still waiting on my contributor agreement form. biggrin:
|
[quote="SW-14":d1583]Well Ed, I know for a fact that the article is false. I know we haven't signed any agreements with EA. Heck, Frank's still waiting on my contributor agreement form. biggrin:[/quote:d1583]
I kinda got the impression that there was an air of falsehood to the article. The article really painted EA in some "warmongering" light, glorifying war. And that slogan.."Real war. Real games". I mean - its kinda cool in a violent sick kind of way. That being said, good job on even getting to be the target of a Gamespot April Fools Joke. |
[quote="ED! Ban #126":a6c74][quote="SW-14":a6c74]Guys, we have been approached by a few publishers, but nothing has been finalized. We aim to keep it like CS in that you will be able to download it for free if you have BF1942.[/quote:a6c74]
Dunno SW, that article makes it seem PRETTY CLEAR that EA wants this mod under their umbrella. And why not. Its shaping up to be a PRETTY popular modification for BF1942, and why mods are exactly what games need to extend the longevity of a product, which in turn means more revenue for the publisher. Honestly - without CS, I cant imagine HL would have the kind of impact it has now....that mod has singlehandedly made Online Gaming the force it is today. I can EASILY see a BF:1942 bundle with DESERT COMBAT. You AUTOMATICALLY get two games in one.[/quote:a6c74] And geesh, it's still in Alpha, CS was far ahead by the time of a retail release. |
hmm i dont understand whats going on??
|
Quote:
SW however counters that, saying the article is false. |
It's definately an April Fools joke. Take a look at some of the names of the other "games":
Powermonger 2: Thirst for War (PC) biggrin: Friendly Fire: The Cavalry (PS2) biggrin: The Human Shield (Xbox) biggrin: Oil Tycoon (PC) biggrin: |
[quote="SW-14":3ecc5]It's definately an April Fools joke. Take a look at some of the names of the other "games":
Powermonger 2: Thirst for War (PC) biggrin: Friendly Fire: The Cavalry (PS2) biggrin: The Human Shield (Xbox) biggrin: Oil Tycoon (PC) biggrin:[/quote:3ecc5] Sad thing is, I can see EA totally producing games with these titles. |
PLEASE BE RETAIL AND THE DOWNLOADED VERSION INVALID WHEN IT COMES OUT
Down with Bf1942. |
[quote="ED! Ban #126":3f267][quote="SW-14":3f267]It's definately an April Fools joke. Take a look at some of the names of the other "games":
Powermonger 2: Thirst for War (PC) biggrin: Friendly Fire: The Cavalry (PS2) biggrin: The Human Shield (Xbox) biggrin: Oil Tycoon (PC) biggrin:[/quote:3f267] Sad thing is, I can see EA totally producing games with these titles.[/quote:3f267] That's very true, and they will all be on the same engine, with the same boring shit, released within weeks, and not a patch. Pyro, wtf... |
cool:
come on, who would be playing htis trash when games like Raven Shield are out. |
I know, I don't play it, but I'm all for mods staying free.
|
desert combat isnt that bad, theyve done alot to the weapons. i personally think its better than the original, but the fucking migs are too fast and the god damn a10 owns everything. if they brought down the power of the planes it would be alot better.
|
Quote:
All that window dressing for nothing. |
Desert combats ok but it has its share of annoyances. The warthog does own just about everything on the map, nothing more fun than having a tank convoy ripped to shreds by its minigun and mini nukes it seems to drop.
The m1 abrams vs the t-55's is a no brainer, the abrams tears through these because you aim a lot differently with the abrams and its easier to connect with your shots. Just a matter of sorting out the planes, obviously they can't be slowed down to corsair style speeds but at the minute you seem to hit the edges of the map after about 10 seconds of air time in some cases. 1 thing id like to see removed is a remnant from battlefield, tanks hitting bumps and for some oOo: reason it takes "health" from the tank. Tanks are designed for almost all terrain i think if they were used for perfectly flat surfaces only they wouldn't be much use in real life. oOo: |
the only reason i use the a10 is if i want to fly 2 inches off the ground and whack someone... other than that im a shilka whore
|
[quote="ED! Ban #126":84ae1]
Quote:
All that window dressing for nothing.[/quote:84ae1] I tend to agree, but online it's different, on the Close Quarters map which was released, me and my friend play Terrorist Hunt, and once they hear shots fired, they flank us like crazy, so teamplay is a must, I cover his back while he clears the room, I find a lot of teamplay online, but not offline. |
i love raven shield...i picked it up last week and im hooked. our sh squad has entered the twl 4 vs 4 ladder ....over 100 teams already! ed:
|
Yeah, we're in 4v4 too.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.