Alliedassault - View Single Post

First Man Down v2.0 · 02-05-2002, 08:26 AM

I think I type in Chinese because whenever I post something, it's point is lost on nearly everyone. Please re-read my reply and then rebutt, if you like.

And "bitching" occurs when someone "bitches" about snipers because they keep getting killed by snipers. If you hang around in one spot in the open too long, you deserve to get sniped.

To have someone spend an hour whining and complaining, but not offering a reason why is not constructive, is it?

Many intelligent individuals have expressed their dislike of certain elements. Some, even, have addressed the issue of too many snipers on the Omaha map. The difference being, they do so in a manner that begs listening and proper response. My point, lost on some of you, is that we haven't been getting reasons behind many individual's complaints. How, I ask, would a game developer gain insight from a comment like this:

"And I often play on the Allied side on Omaha! I am so sick and tired of the sniper fest that is Omaha. I knew wwwaaaayyyyy before the game was released that Omaha was going to turn into a sniper war.
Just look at DoD_Omaha if you want proof. I want MG42s spraying bullets at my feet, not some pussy sniper putting a bullet in my head.
Anyway are there any Omaha servers that run that no-sniper mod besides the sweedish one?"

How is that constructive?

In the last two days there are AT LEAST ten threads related to snipers and how "they suck." Only one of them offers suggestions.

On a lighter note, I always get a laugh when someone claims Allied snipers on Omaha beach aren't historically accurate! Well, at least we'll give them credit for coming up with a reason.

	(#8)
First Man Down v2.0 is Offline Member Posts: 87 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Guelph, ON, Canada	02-05-2002, 08:26 AM I think I type in Chinese because whenever I post something, it's point is lost on nearly everyone. Please re-read my reply and then rebutt, if you like. And "bitching" occurs when someone "bitches" about snipers because they keep getting killed by snipers. If you hang around in one spot in the open too long, you deserve to get sniped. To have someone spend an hour whining and complaining, but not offering a reason why is not constructive, is it? Many intelligent individuals have expressed their dislike of certain elements. Some, even, have addressed the issue of too many snipers on the Omaha map. The difference being, they do so in a manner that begs listening and proper response. My point, lost on some of you, is that we haven't been getting reasons behind many individual's complaints. How, I ask, would a game developer gain insight from a comment like this: "And I often play on the Allied side on Omaha! I am so sick and tired of the sniper fest that is Omaha. I knew wwwaaaayyyyy before the game was released that Omaha was going to turn into a sniper war. Just look at DoD_Omaha if you want proof. I want MG42s spraying bullets at my feet, not some pussy sniper putting a bullet in my head. Anyway are there any Omaha servers that run that no-sniper mod besides the sweedish one?" How is that constructive? In the last two days there are AT LEAST ten threads related to snipers and how "they suck." Only one of them offers suggestions. On a lighter note, I always get a laugh when someone claims Allied snipers on Omaha beach aren't historically accurate! Well, at least we'll give them credit for coming up with a reason.