Alliedassault - View Single Post

Totenkopf · 09-09-2002, 11:53 PM

It is almost impossible to call a tank the "best", each has it's advantages over the other. The Abrams and the Leopard are some pretty amazing machines though.

As for WW II, again the same problem. Sure the Tiger was a massive killing machine, but mechanically unreliable. If you had to vote for a best all around tank of WW II, I would go with the T-34/85. I would write more, but I am a bit f#cked up right now. Sorry. biggrin: ed: evil:

	(#13)
Totenkopf is Offline Senior Member Posts: 1,019 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Heading towards my couch for a free lap dance	09-09-2002, 11:53 PM It is almost impossible to call a tank the "best", each has it's advantages over the other. The Abrams and the Leopard are some pretty amazing machines though. As for WW II, again the same problem. Sure the Tiger was a massive killing machine, but mechanically unreliable. If you had to vote for a best all around tank of WW II, I would go with the T-34/85. I would write more, but I am a bit f#cked up right now. Sorry. biggrin: ed: evil: