| Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk. |
  Tanks |
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 541
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
|
Tanks -
09-09-2002, 04:46 PM
As of currently, what tank is the most powerful tank in the world? Jus curious to know cool:
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
09-09-2002, 04:49 PM
the abram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Lieutenant
Posts: 4,657
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California, USA
|
09-09-2002, 04:50 PM
hell yea. Super armor super engine, super suspension, super stuf inside biggrin:
i hear its not too long before its replaced with a newer model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 541
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
|
09-09-2002, 04:51 PM
Any sort of pictures or anything related to it? possibly even a link to tank section
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
09-09-2002, 04:52 PM
Tanks are worthless. I'd rather have Helicopters like the AH-64 and MI-28.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Lieutenant
Posts: 4,657
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California, USA
|
09-09-2002, 04:53 PM
biggrin:
Tanks worthless?? ok.......
[img]http://www.attrition.org/gallery/politics/bin_laden/talibans_best_tank.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 3,849
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bothell, Washington, U.S.A
|
09-09-2002, 05:06 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blitz
Tanks are worthless. I'd rather have Helicopters like the AH-64 and MI-28.
|
Whoa its Mr.Poop ed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 541
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
|
09-09-2002, 05:33 PM
awesome, what other tanks are good, during WWII, not modern this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 11,144
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
09-09-2002, 05:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Lieutenant
Posts: 4,657
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California, USA
|
09-09-2002, 06:13 PM
try researching the german "Tiger tank", and the russian "T-34". The two best tanks of WWll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 8,546
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: I don't know
|
09-09-2002, 06:26 PM
The leopard and the challenger are gooder dan da abram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,019
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Heading towards my couch for a free lap dance
|
09-09-2002, 11:53 PM
It is almost impossible to call a tank the "best", each has it's advantages over the other. The Abrams and the Leopard are some pretty amazing machines though.
As for WW II, again the same problem. Sure the Tiger was a massive killing machine, but mechanically unreliable. If you had to vote for a best all around tank of WW II, I would go with the T-34/85. I would write more, but I am a bit f#cked up right now. Sorry. biggrin: ed: evil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
|
Linear Mode
