[Blitz-krieg]

I also read something online that billions of years ago, humans actually exists and created nukes to destroy each other cause now, they found craters, which asteroids didn't created and they also find some atomic minerals, something like that, which in conclusion nukes exists in the past oOo:

Hmm, Intresting. Also a bit of a follow up to the topic...

I'v read an article somewhere, Forget it now, Anyway, They claim that the US Goverment actualy crashed the plans into the 2 Towers. Saying that those certin planes we're the only ones that could be controled from a control type thing... Perhaps defensive offcials wanted a higher budget? (Thats from the article) It's by some French guy....
I'll search for some links and post them here.. l8er!

Heres one, with a bunch of links to some Articles...

http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm

There are some intresting ones...

[Cpt. Obvious]

You actually think something is real that was created by a French Guy. Come on the French always lie. You cant trust them.

[Pfc.Green]

Originally Posted by Quze

Hmm, Intresting. Also a bit of a follow up to the topic...

I'v read an article somewhere, Forget it now, Anyway, They claim that the US Goverment actualy crashed the plans into the 2 Towers. Saying that those certin planes we're the only ones that could be controled from a control type thing... Perhaps defensive offcials wanted a higher budget? (Thats from the article) It's by some French guy....
I'll search for some links and post them here.. l8er!

And i've already been to mars and set up a summer home there.

[Shroom]

Oh I thought it was going to be like Pentagon being remodeled into Circle....

[1080jibber]

[qoute]Can you explain how a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour* only damaged the outside of the Pentagon?[/qoute]

wasnt the pentagon built to survive, bombs and missles and all kinds of attacks

[qoute]Can you explain how a Boeing 14.9 yards high, 51.7 yards long, with a wingspan of 41.6 yards and a cockpit 3.8 yards high, could crash into just the ground floor of this building?[/qoute]

was this guy flying the plane at the time, were they aiming for the top floors or something (but again i think the pentagon was supose to withstand all kinds of attacks


[qoute]You'll remember that the aircraft only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon's first ring. Can you find debris of a Boeing 757-200 in this photograph?[/qoute]

how much plane debris was found at the WTC, and wouldnt the fire be hot enough to melt it to nothing

[qoute]Can you explain why the Defence Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?[/qoute]

now how do you expect the trucks and cranes to get up to the building, it doesnt take a genius to know that all thoughs heavy trucks and cranes driving on the grass will sink and make the place a big mud hole (plus it rained like crazy a few days after)

[qoute]Can you explain what happened to the wings of the aircraft and why they caused no damage?[/qoute]
[img]http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/images/avion-incrustation.jpg[/img]

you can clearly see that there is damage along the bottom of the building, and a big gaping hole where the biggest part of the plane whent


[qoute]Can you explain why the County Fire Chief could not tell reporters where the aircraft was?[/qoute]

now that day was one of the crazzzyest days i have ever seen, like it was a crazy day for me and i live in canada and just some douche bag, just image what kind of a day it was for the county fire cheif.....so how much information would you give out (plus, how many planes have you seen fileing into buildings, whats that, only the planes that hit the pentagon and the WTC theres my point, we have never seen this before so how do we know whats going to happen to the plane or the building


i think that webpage is a joke, and the guy that made it has way to much time on there hands

Originally Posted by Quze

Hmm, Intresting. Also a bit of a follow up to the topic...

I'v read an article somewhere, Forget it now, Anyway, They claim that the US Goverment actualy crashed the plans into the 2 Towers. Saying that those certin planes we're the only ones that could be controled from a control type thing... Perhaps defensive offcials wanted a higher budget? (Thats from the article) It's by some French guy....
I'll search for some links and post them here.. l8er!

I believe they were different planes (767s and 757s)

[Milla]

the one that hit the pentagon was small

[Arkan]

Well, conspiracies probably do happen but with good reasons. As for this jackasses theory? Nope, his theory sucks. Now why would the government hide the fact that the building was damaged by a truck bomb and not an airplane filled with civilians? Makes absolutely no sense to me.

You want to hear a valid theory? I'll tell you a valid theory that i have. It has to do with the plane that crashed over Pennsylvania on 9/11. Now, before i state my theory, i just want to say that i believe the people on board were about to do something about their fate and they were very brave "but", i believe the plane was really shot down by our military. Now why do i believe this you ask? Ok, i'll state my reasoning and you tell me if any of it makes any sense. (I guarantee my theory is better than that jackass)

1. The plane "crashed" close to 2 hrs after the 1st reported hi-jacking. Now, when any plane over US skies gets hi-jacked, the FCC notifies the military and they get jets in the sky to monitor it.

2. During this 2 hours, don't you think we had a jet in the air? This is after both WTC buildings were hit and after the Pentagon.

3. Early reports from family members of those on board told of their loved ones hearing an explosion and seeing white smoke in the cabin before they lost contact. Hmm, perhaps the plane was hit by some sort of gunfire/missle or whatever and the white smoke was caused by de-pressurization?

4. A seperate debris field was found 6 miles away (In the opposite direction that the plane was headed) indicating that pieces of the plane were lost before it hit the ground. (shot perhaps?)

5. Early reports from the news that day stated that the plane "may have been shot down". Witnesses on the ground said they saw a military plane alongside the boeing.

6. Now, from these facts, i believe the plane was really shot down and covered up. Why the cover up you ask? Could you imagine the response from the American people and from people across the world for that matter over our military shooting down a plane full of civilians? They took the "Lets roll" story and ran with it and made that guy a national hero so they could cover their asses. That guy and all aboard were heros that day but i'm sorry, we shot that plane down. I just wish they told the truth...i could respect their decision to shoot the plane.

What do you think??

[Milla]

Originally Posted by Arkan

i believe the plane was really shot down by our military.

Totally agree arkan, theres to much debris to not have been shot down

impossible.

[cameltoe]

i knida is a big consiparcy so bush could finish what his dad didnt. i mean what better way to legitametly start a war with a country than to blame them for an attack on the homeland. i donno just my thoughts on this.. i would elaborate but im kinda tired

they probably did shoot it down and i really have no problem with that. however, considering how the majority of the country is full of pussies looking for a reason to whine, they would be all over the government.

[pest]

I could accept arkans theory. Dont know enough of the details to support it, but it sounds plausable. The rest is garbage.

oOo: Most of these guys fall into the "I want to believe" category and are blinded to common sense and logic. oOo: